Literature DB >> 23434338

Sustaining innovation and improvement in the treatment of childhood cancer: lessons from high-income countries.

Kathy Pritchard-Jones1, Rob Pieters, Gregory H Reaman, Lars Hjorth, Peter Downie, Gabriele Calaminus, Marianne C Naafs-Wilstra, Eva Steliarova-Foucher.   

Abstract

Cancer in children and adolescents is rare and biologically very different from cancer in adults. It accounts for 1·4% of all cancers worldwide, although this proportion ranges from 0·5% in Europe to 4·8% in Africa, largely because of differences in age composition and life expectancy. In high-income countries, survival from childhood cancer has reached 80% through a continuous focus on the integration of clinical research into front-line care for nearly all children affected by malignant disease. However, further improvement must entail new biology-driven approaches, since optimisation of conventional treatments has in many cases reached its limits. In many instances, such approaches can only be achieved through international collaborative research, since rare cancers are being subdivided into increasingly smaller subgroups on the basis of their molecular characteristics. The long-term effect of anticancer treatment on quality of life must also be taken into account because more than one in 1000 adults in high-income countries are thought to be survivors of cancer in childhood or adolescence. The introduction of drugs that are less toxic and more targeted than those currently used necessitates a partnership between clinical and translational researchers, the pharmaceutical industry, drug regulators, and patients and their families. This therapeutic alliance will ensure that efforts are focused on the unmet clinical needs of young people with cancer. Most children with cancer live in low-income and middle-income countries, and these countries account for 94% of all deaths from cancer in people aged 0-14 years. The immediate priority for these children is to improve access to an affordable, best standard of care in each country. Every country should have a national cancer plan that recognises the unique demographic characteristics and care needs of young people with cancer. Centralisation of the complex components of treatment of these rare diseases is essential to improve survival, accelerate research, and train the future specialist workforce. Referral routes and care pathways must take account of the large geographical distances between many patients' homes and treatment centres, and the economic, cultural, and linguistic diversity of the populations served.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23434338     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70010-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  50 in total

1.  Declining childhood and adolescent cancer mortality.

Authors:  Malcolm A Smith; Sean F Altekruse; Peter C Adamson; Gregory H Reaman; Nita L Seibel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  An Asia pacific alliance for rare diseases.

Authors:  Durhane Wong-Rieger; William Claxton; Richard Vines; Carmencita Padilla; Kin Ping Tsang; Lucy Hickinbotham
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Anacolosins A-F and Corymbulosins X and Y, Clerodane Diterpenes from Anacolosa clarkii Exhibiting Cytotoxicity toward Pediatric Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Shengxin Cai; April L Risinger; Cora L Petersen; Tanja Grkovic; Barry R O'Keefe; Susan L Mooberry; Robert H Cichewicz
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.050

4.  Development of the functional social network index for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Conor M Jones; Tara M Brinkman; Melissa M Hudson; D Kumar Srivastava; Yuelin Li; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Improved outcome of childhood acute myeloid leukemia in an Eastern European country: Lithuanian experience.

Authors:  Igne Kairiene; Ramune Pasauliene; Nadezda Lipunova; Goda Vaitkeviciene; Lina Rageliene; Jelena Rascon
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Differences in childhood leukemia incidence and survival between Southern Thailand and the United States: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Kathryn Demanelis; Hutcha Sriplung; Rafael Meza; Surapon Wiangnon; Laura S Rozek; Michael E Scheurer; Philip J Lupo
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  Nanomedicine as an innovative therapeutic strategy for pediatric cancer.

Authors:  Essa Mohd Aleassa; Malcolm Xing; Richard Keijzer
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 8.  Toward the Cure of All Children With Cancer Through Collaborative Efforts: Pediatric Oncology As a Global Challenge.

Authors:  Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Paola Friedrich; Patricia Alcasabas; Federico Antillon; Shripad Banavali; Luis Castillo; Trijn Israels; Sima Jeha; Mhammed Harif; Michael J Sullivan; Thuan Chong Quah; Catherine Patte; Ching-Hon Pui; Ronald Barr; Thomas Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Drug discovery in paediatric oncology: roadblocks to progress.

Authors:  Peter C Adamson; Peter J Houghton; Giorgio Perilongo; Kathy Pritchard-Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Childhood extracranial neoplasms: the role of imaging in drug development and clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucy A Fowkes; Dow-Mu Koh; David J Collins; Neil P Jerome; David MacVicar; Sue C Chua; Andrew D J Pearson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.