Literature DB >> 23434292

Drug reimbursement recommendations by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: have they impacted the National Health Service budget?

Josephine Mauskopf1, Costel Chirila, Julie Birt, Kristina S Boye, Lee Bowman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether reimbursement restrictions recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) have impacted the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) budget.
METHODS: Data were abstracted from NICE guidance documents and costing statements through March 2011. Estimated maximum and adjusted potential budget impact (PBI) on the NHS was derived using estimates of the UK marketing-approved population and the annual cost for the new drug. Descriptive and logistic analyses were used to estimate the correlation between the degree of restrictions on reimbursement recommended by NICE for each new drug indication and the PBI controlling for clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
RESULTS: PBI was significantly correlated with the degree of reimbursement restrictions. In descriptive analysis, the adjusted PBI for drugs that were recommended without restrictions was £20.3 million (SD = 22.2) compared with £49.8 million (SD = 90.8) for those recommended with restrictions and £71.1 million (SE = 99.9) for those not recommended. In logistic analysis, the odds ratio for less restrictive reimbursement was 0.848 (95% CI, 0.762-0.945) for each £20 million increase in the adjusted PBI. Results were similar using the maximum PBI.
CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, the degree of reimbursement restriction recommended by NICE remains significantly correlated with the PBI, despite that fact that the NICE decision process does not consider budget impact. This correlation might be due to NICE consideration of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for subgroups of the approved population.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23434292     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Methodological Review of US Budget-Impact Models for New Drugs.

Authors:  Josephine Mauskopf; Stephanie Earnshaw
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Defining and Measuring the Affordability of New Medicines: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fernando Antoñanzas; Robert Terkola; Paul M Overton; Natalie Shalet; Maarten Postma
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Revealed and Stated Preferences of Decision Makers for Priority Setting in Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter Ghijben; Yuanyuan Gu; Emily Lancsar; Silva Zavarsek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Health Economic Data in Reimbursement of New Medical Technologies: Importance of the Socio-Economic Burden as a Decision-Making Criterion.

Authors:  Georgi Iskrov; Svetlan Dermendzhiev; Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva; Rumen Stefanov
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Role of economic evidence in coverage decision-making in South Korea.

Authors:  Eun-Young Bae; Hui Jeong Kim; Hye-Jae Lee; Junho Jang; Seung Min Lee; Yunkyung Jung; Nari Yoon; Tae Kyung Kim; Kookhee Kim; Bong-Min Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.