Literature DB >> 23434025

Applying organisation theory to understand barriers and facilitators to the implementation of baby-friendly: A multisite qualitative study.

Nathan C Nickel1, Emily C Taylor, Miriam H Labbok, Bryan J Weiner, Nancy E Williamson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (a) to apply an organisation-level, pre-implementation theory to identify and describe factors that may impact hospitals' readiness to achieve the Ten Steps and (b) to explore whether/how these factors vary across hospitals.
DESIGN: a multisite, descriptive, qualitative study of eight hospitals that used semi-structured interviews of health-care professionals. Template analyses identified factors that related to organisation-level theory. Cross-site comparative analyses explored how factors varied across hospitals.
SETTING: thirty-four health-care professionals from eight North Carolina hospitals serving low-wealth populations. The hospitals are participating in a quality improvement project to support the implementation of the Ten Steps. This study occurred during the pre-implementation phase.
FINDINGS: several factors emerged relating to collective efficacy (i.e., the shared belief that the group, as a whole, is able to implement the Steps) and collective commitment (i.e., the shared belief that the group, as a whole, is committed to implementing the Steps) to implement the Ten Steps. Factors relating to both constructs included 'staff age/experience,' 'perceptions of forcing versus supporting mothers,' 'perceptions of mothers' culture,' and 'reliance on lactation consultants.' Factors relating to commitment included 'night versus day shift,' 'management support,' 'change champions,' 'observing mothers utilize breastfeeding support.' Factors relating to efficacy included 'staffing,' 'trainings,' and 'visitors in room.' Commitment-factors were more salient than efficacy-factors among the three large hospitals. Efficacy-factors were more salient than commitment-factors among the smaller hospitals. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: interventions focused on implementing the Ten Step may benefit from improving collective efficacy and collective commitment. Potential approaches could include skills-based, hands-on training highlighting benefits for mothers, staff, and the hospital, and addressing context-specific misconceptions about the Steps.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI); Breastfeeding; Maternity practices; Organisational change

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23434025     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  9 in total

Review 1.  Understanding process and context in breastfeeding support interventions: The potential of qualitative research.

Authors:  Dawn Leeming; Joyce Marshall; Abigail Locke
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.

Authors:  David Wright; John Gabbay; Andrée Le May
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 7.418

3.  Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTN-IMPROVE study.

Authors:  Ryan J Shaw; Miriam A Kaufman; Hayden B Bosworth; Bryan J Weiner; Leah L Zullig; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee; Jeffrey D Kravetz; Susan M Rakley; Christianne L Roumie; Michael E Bowen; Pamela S Del Monte; Eugene Z Oddone; George L Jackson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  The bumpy road to implementing the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative in Austria: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Christina C Wieczorek; Hermann Schmied; Thomas E Dorner; Wolfgang Dür
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.461

Review 5.  Meausures of organizational characteristics associated with adoption and/or implementation of innovations: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Samuel D Towne; Annette E Maxwell; Lisa DiMartino; Bryan Leyva; Deborah J Bowen; Laura Linnan; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  A Mixed-Methods Examination of Inpatient Breastfeeding Education Using a Human Factors Perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lerner Papautsky; Mary Dawn Koenig
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  A nation-wide study on the common reasons for infant formula supplementation among healthy, term, breastfed infants in US hospitals.

Authors:  Larelle H Bookhart; Erica H Anstey; Michael R Kramer; Cria G Perrine; Harumi Reis-Reilly; Usha Ramakrishnan; Melissa F Young
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Implementing the ten steps to successful breastfeeding in multiple hospitals serving low-wealth patients in the US: innovative research design and baseline findings.

Authors:  Miriam H Labbok; Emily C Taylor; Nathan C Nickel
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.461

9.  Breastfeeding and the origins of health: Interdisciplinary perspectives and priorities.

Authors:  Meghan B Azad; Nathan C Nickel; Lars Bode; Meredith Brockway; Amy Brown; Christina Chambers; Camie Goldhammer; Katie Hinde; Michelle McGuire; Daniel Munblit; Aloka L Patel; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Natalie Shenker; Bridget E Young; Luisa Zuccolo
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.092

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.