Rachel Olson1, Carol Couchie. 1. Department of Anthropology, University of Sussex, United Kingdom. r.olson@sussex.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to explore the role of midwives in the implementation of an elective birthing programme in one remote First Nation community in Canada, and to identify current barriers and challenges to the practice of midwifery in these settings DESIGN: the study is a multisited ethnography based on 15 months of fieldwork in Manitoba, Canada. Thirty-nine individual qualitative, semi-structured interviews were completed. The data from the interviews were coded into themes and presented in the paper. SETTING: the study focuses on one First Nation community and their process of implementation of midwifery services. This case study is used to address broader themes of midwifery and policy at a national level. PARTICIPANTS: participants included Aboriginal midwives from across Canada, policy makers from provincial and federal jurisdictions, medical professionals involved in Aboriginal health care, Aboriginal political leadership, and Aboriginal women and their families. FINDINGS: national policy and issues of jurisdiction among levels of government were shown to be a barrier to midwifery implementation. KEY CONCLUSIONS: the current policy of evacuation in most Aboriginal communities does not effectively address the Millennium Development Goal of having a skilled birth attendant at every birth. The role of midwifery is central to the process of returning birth to Aboriginal communities, and steps must be taken at both the policy and clinical level to ensure that midwifery implementation and education can become an option for all Aboriginal communities in Canada. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: when considering midwifery implementation in communities, midwives must engage in both political and clinical negotiations to ensure their ability to practice effectively. Understanding the complexity of the policy discourse, along with the place of midwifery within the existing clinical guidelines is integral to the success of this process.
OBJECTIVE: to explore the role of midwives in the implementation of an elective birthing programme in one remote First Nation community in Canada, and to identify current barriers and challenges to the practice of midwifery in these settings DESIGN: the study is a multisited ethnography based on 15 months of fieldwork in Manitoba, Canada. Thirty-nine individual qualitative, semi-structured interviews were completed. The data from the interviews were coded into themes and presented in the paper. SETTING: the study focuses on one First Nation community and their process of implementation of midwifery services. This case study is used to address broader themes of midwifery and policy at a national level. PARTICIPANTS: participants included Aboriginal midwives from across Canada, policy makers from provincial and federal jurisdictions, medical professionals involved in Aboriginal health care, Aboriginal political leadership, and Aboriginal women and their families. FINDINGS: national policy and issues of jurisdiction among levels of government were shown to be a barrier to midwifery implementation. KEY CONCLUSIONS: the current policy of evacuation in most Aboriginal communities does not effectively address the Millennium Development Goal of having a skilled birth attendant at every birth. The role of midwifery is central to the process of returning birth to Aboriginal communities, and steps must be taken at both the policy and clinical level to ensure that midwifery implementation and education can become an option for all Aboriginal communities in Canada. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: when considering midwifery implementation in communities, midwives must engage in both political and clinical negotiations to ensure their ability to practice effectively. Understanding the complexity of the policy discourse, along with the place of midwifery within the existing clinical guidelines is integral to the success of this process.
Authors: Mackenzie E Churchill; Janet K Smylie; Sara H Wolfe; Cheryllee Bourgeois; Helle Moeller; Michelle Firestone Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 2.692