Literature DB >> 23433799

A population-based study of the fractionation of postlumpectomy breast radiation therapy.

Allison Ashworth1, Weidong Kong, Timothy Whelan, William J Mackillop.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The optimal fractionation schedule of post lumpectomy radiation therapy remains controversial. The objective of this study was to describe the fractionation of post-lumpectomy radiation therapy (RT) in Ontario, before and after the seminal Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG) trial, which showed the equivalence of 16- and 25-fraction schedules. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted by linking electronic treatment records to a population-based cancer registry. The study population included all patients who underwent lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer in Ontario, Canada, between 1984 and 2008.
RESULTS: Over the study period, 41,747 breast cancer patients received post lumpectomy radiation therapy to the breast only. Both 16- and 25-fraction schedules were commonly used throughout the study period. In the early 1980s, shorter fractionation schedules were used in >80% of cases. Between 1985 and 1995, the proportion of patients treated with shorter fractionation decreased to 48%. After completion of the OCOG trial, shorter fractionation schemes were once again widely adopted across Ontario, and are currently used in about 71% of cases; however, large intercenter variations in fractionation persisted.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of shorter schedules of post lumpectomy RT in Ontario increased after completion of the OCOG trial, but the trial had a less normative effect on practice than expected.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23433799     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  Geographic Disparity in the Use of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Among Elderly Women Undergoing Breast Conservation for Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Erin F Gillespie; Rayna K Matsuno; Beibei Xu; Daniel P Triplett; Lindsay Hwang; Isabel J Boero; John P Einck; Catheryn Yashar; James D Murphy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Longitudinal analysis of patient-reported outcomes and cosmesis in a randomized trial of conventionally fractionated versus hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation.

Authors:  Cameron W Swanick; Xiudong Lei; Simona F Shaitelman; Pamela J Schlembach; Elizabeth S Bloom; Michelle C Fingeret; Eric A Strom; Welela Tereffe; Wendy A Woodward; Michael C Stauder; Tomas Dvorak; Alastair M Thompson; Thomas A Buchholz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation is cost-effective-but is that enough to change practice?

Authors:  Apar Gupta; Nisha Ohri; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.241

4.  Utilization trend and regimens of hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy in the United States.

Authors:  Yasmin Hasan; Joseph Waller; Katharine Yao; Steven J Chmura; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Gosia Sylwestrzak; John Barron; Jinan Liu; Andrew J Epstein; Gary Freedman; Jennifer Malin; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Hypofractionated radiation treatment in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Apar Gupta; Nisha Ohri; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.512

7.  Comparison of Mammographic Changes Across Three Different Fractionation Schedules for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sibo Tian; Lina F Paster; Sinae Kim; Laurie Kirstein; Bruce G Haffty; Adam Ferro; Judith Amorosa; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Acute and Short-term Toxic Effects of Conventionally Fractionated vs Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Simona F Shaitelman; Pamela J Schlembach; Isidora Arzu; Matthew Ballo; Elizabeth S Bloom; Daniel Buchholz; Gregory M Chronowski; Tomas Dvorak; Emily Grade; Karen E Hoffman; Patrick Kelly; Michelle Ludwig; George H Perkins; Valerie Reed; Shalin Shah; Michael C Stauder; Eric A Strom; Welela Tereffe; Wendy A Woodward; Joe Ensor; Donald Baumann; Alastair M Thompson; Diana Amaya; Tanisha Davis; William Guerra; Lois Hamblin; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Has Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiation Therapy Become the Standard of Care in the United States? An Updated Report from National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Minji M Kang; Yasmin Hasan; Joseph Waller; Loren Saulsberry; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Development and Pilot Implementation of a Remote Monitoring System for Acute Toxicity Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Lapen; Christopher Sabol; Amy L Tin; Kathleen Lynch; Alyse Kassa; Xiaolin Mabli; John Ford; Elaine Cha; Michael B Bernstein; Lior Z Braunstein; Oren Cahlon; Bobby M Daly; Kiri Sandler; Susan A McCloskey; Andrew J Vickers; Atif J Khan; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.