Literature DB >> 23433757

Intravascular ultrasound predictors for edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation.

Soo-Jin Kang1, Young-Rak Cho, Gyung-Min Park, Jung-Min Ahn, Won-Jang Kim, Jong-Young Lee, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Cheol Whan Lee, Gary S Mintz, Seong-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the intravascular ultrasound predictors for angiographic edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation. A total of 820 patients (987 lesions) who underwent newer generation drug-eluting stent placement (236 Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 246 Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 505 everolimus-eluting stents) with 9 months of angiographic surveillance were enrolled. The post-stenting angiographic and intravascular ultrasound images of 1,668 reference segments (681 proximal and 987 distal) were analyzed. Overall, 37% of angiographically normal proximal reference segments and 21% of angiographically normal distal reference segments had plaque burden >50%. In the overall cohort of 1,668 reference segments, 47 (2.8%) had 9-month angiographic edge restenosis (diameter stenosis >50%). Edge restenosis was predicted by a post-stenting reference segment plaque burden >54.5% (sensitivity 81%, specificity 80%) and a reference segment minimum lumen area of 5.7 mm(2) (sensitivity 72%, specificity 59%). The edge restenosis rate was 2.1% in the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 2.4% in the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 3.4% in the everolimus-eluting stents lesions (p = 0.311). The predictive cutoff of the reference plaque burden was 56.3% for Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 57.3% for Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 54.2% for everolimus-eluting stents. The criteria for residual plaque burden were similar between proximal and distal reference segments (56.4% vs 51.9%, respectively), but the minimum lumen area criteria were quite different (<7.1 mm(2) for proximal vs <4.8 mm(2) for distal reference segments). In conclusion, after newer drug-eluting stent implantation, edge restenosis was predicted by post-stenting reference segment plaque burden >55%.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23433757     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  Imaging- and physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention without contrast administration in advanced renal failure: a feasibility, safety, and outcome study.

Authors:  Ziad A Ali; Keyvan Karimi Galougahi; Tamim Nazif; Akiko Maehara; Mark A Hardy; David J Cohen; Lloyd E Ratner; Michael B Collins; Jeffrey W Moses; Ajay J Kirtane; Gregg W Stone; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Mechanisms of drug-eluting stent restenosis.

Authors:  Jiro Aoki; Kengo Tanabe
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2020-11-21

3.  One-year outcomes of novel BioMime Morph tapered stent in long and multiple coronary artery lesions.

Authors:  Yash Paul Sharma; Lipi Uppal; Prashant Panda; Soumitra Mohanty; Ganesh Kasinadhuni; Darshan Krishnappa; Saurabh Mehrotra; Ankur Gupta; Krishna Prasad; Krishna Santosh; Dinakar Bootla; Soumitra Ghosh
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 4.  Optical Coherence Tomography of the Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Robert Roland; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-02-12

5.  Impact of the distance from the stent edge to the residual plaque on edge restenosis following everolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Masao Takahashi; Susumu Miyazaki; Masahiro Myojo; Daigo Sawaki; Hiroshi Iwata; Arihiro Kiyosue; Yasutomi Higashikuni; Tomofumi Tanaka; Daishi Fujita; Jiro Ando; Hideo Fujita; Yasunobu Hirata; Issei Komuro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  FFR guided PCI on long coronary lesions: 2-year clinical results with 2nd or newer generation DES.

Authors:  Arvydas Baranauskas; Vilhelmas Bajoras; Povilas Budrys; Aleksandras Laucevičius; Giedrius Davidavičius
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2016

7.  The angiography-guided spot versus entire stenting in patients with long coronary lesions trial: Study design and rationale for a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Ju Yeol Baek; Seung Woon Rha; Byoung Geol Choi; Cheol Ung Choi; Kyoung-Ha Park; Byung Hee Hwang; Seung-Jin Lee; Young Keun Ahn; Jae Woong Choi; In-Ho Chae; Won Ho Choi; Young-Hyo Lim; Ji Hoon Ahn; Woong Gil Choi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-01-14

8.  Survivals of Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Proportion of Intracoronary Imaging at Population Level: The Imaging Paradox.

Authors:  Andrew Kei-Yan Ng; Pauline Yeung Ng; April Ip; Lap-Tin Lam; Chung-Wah Siu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-24

Review 9.  Personalized Assessment of the Coronary Atherosclerotic Arteries by Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging: Hunting the Vulnerable Plaque.

Authors:  Theodore G Papaioannou; Charalampos Kalantzis; Efstratios Katsianos; Despina Sanoudou; Manolis Vavuranakis; Dimitrios Tousoulis
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-01-24

Review 10.  Efficacy of coronary imaging on bifurcation intervention.

Authors:  Kensuke Takagi; Ryoji Nagoshi; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Woong Kim; Yoshihisa Kinoshita; Junya Shite; Yutaka Hikichi; Young Bin Song; Chang-Wook Nam; Bon-Kwon Koo; Soo-Joong Kim; Yoshinobu Murasato
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2020-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.