Literature DB >> 23433562

Incremental cost-effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure.

Gaurav Banka1, Paul A Heidenreich, Gregg C Fonarow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), beta-blocker (BB), and aldosterone antagonist (AldA) therapies for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
BACKGROUND: There are evidence-based, guideline-directed medical therapies for patients with HFrEF, but the incremental cost-effectiveness of these therapies has not been well studied using contemporary data.
METHODS: A Markov model with lifetime horizon and two states, dead or alive, was created. We compared HFrEF patients treated with diuretic agents alone to three treatment arms: 1) ACEI therapy alone; 2) ACEI+BB; and 3) ACEI+BB+AldA. Sequential therapy was also analyzed. HF hospitalizations and mortality rates were based on representative studies. Costs of medications and inpatient and outpatient care were accounted for.
RESULTS: Treatment with ACEI and ACEI+BB strictly dominated treatment with diuretics only (cost-saving). The greatest gains in quality-adjusted life-years occurred when all 3 guideline-directed medications were provided. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ACEI+BB+AldA versus ACEI+BB and ACEI+BB versus ACEI was <$1,500 per quality-adjusted life-year. The cost-savings in the ACEI and ACEI+BB cohorts compared to that with diuretics alone were $444 and $33, respectively. Assuming lower treatment costs and lower hospitalization rates in the ACEI+BB+AldA arm resulted in greater cost-savings. Even in the most unfavorable situations, the ICER was <$10,000 per life-year gained.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrates that medical treatment of HFrEF is highly cost-effective and may even result in cost-savings. Greater efforts to ensure optimal adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy for HFrEF are warranted.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23433562     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  11 in total

1.  The effect of captopril and losartan on the electrophysiology of myocardial cells of myocardial ischemia rats.

Authors:  Xiangmin Shi; Zhaoling Shan; Hongtao Yuan; Hongyang Guo; Yutang Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Kevin L Ong; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  The impact of adherence on costs and effectiveness of telemedical patient management in heart failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  A S Hameed; S Sauermann; G Schreier
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  Economic Issues in Heart Failure in the United States.

Authors:  Paul A Heidenreich; Gregg C Fonarow; Yekaterina Opsha; Alexander T Sandhu; Nancy K Sweitzer; Haider J Warraich
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.592

Review 5.  New medications for heart failure.

Authors:  Jonathan S Gordin; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 6.677

6.  Adoption of Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Management of Patients With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Lindsey R Sangaralingham; S Jeson Sangaralingham; Nilay D Shah; Xiaoxi Yao; Shannon M Dunlay
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.790

7.  Who Signs Up for and Engages in a Peer Support Heart Failure Self-management Intervention.

Authors:  Rebecca Mase; Lakshmi Halasyamani; Hwajung Choi; Michele Heisler
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Disease management programs in chronic heart failure : Position statement of the Heart Failure Working Group and the Working Group of the Cardiological Assistance and Care Personnel of the Austrian Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Deddo Moertl; Johann Altenberger; Norbert Bauer; Robert Berent; Rudolf Berger; Armin Boehmer; Christian Ebner; Margarethe Fritsch; Friedrich Geyrhofer; Martin Huelsmann; Gerhard Poelzl; Thomas Stefenelli
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas D Gollop; John Ford; Pieter Mackeith; Caroline Thurlow; Rachel Wakelin; Nicholas Steel; Robert Fleetcroft
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2018-04-24

10.  Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness Models for Pharmacologic Interventions in Adults with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Gian Luca Di Tanna; Anna Bychenkova; Frank O'Neill; Heidi S Wirtz; Paul Miller; Briain Ó Hartaigh; Gary Globe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.