Literature DB >> 23432769

Orphan papers and ghostwriting: the case against the ICMJE criterion of authorship.

Barton Moffatt1.   

Abstract

Although popular, I argue that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) account of authorship is flawed. It inadvertently allows for practices that it was designed to prevent. In addition, it creates a new category of authorless papers--orphan papers. The original World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) criterion is preferable.

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23432769     DOI： 10.1080/08989621.2013.767115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN： 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  5 in total

1.  Authorship policies of scientific journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Ana M Tyler; Jennifer R Black; Grace Kissling
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication.

Authors:  Mohammad Hosseini; Jonathan Lewis; Hub Zwart; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.777

3.  Authorship Issues and Conflict in the U.S. Academic Chemical Community.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Seeman; Mark C House
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories.

Authors:  Gregory S Patience; Federico Galli; Paul A Patience; Daria C Boffito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  No room for ambiguity: The concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications.

Authors:  Mohammad Javed Ali
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.848
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.