| Literature DB >> 23432755 |
T M Suszynski1, K J Gillingham1, M D Rizzari1, T B Dunn1, W D Payne1, S Chinnakotla1, E B Finger1, D E R Sutherland1, J S Najarian1, T L Pruett1, A J Matas1, R Kandaswamy1.
Abstract
Rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) has minimized steroid-related complications following kidney transplant (KT). This trial compares long-term (10-year) outcomes with three different maintenance immunosuppressive protocols following RDP in adult KT. Recipients (n=440; 73% living donor) from March 2001 to April 2006 were randomized into one of three arms: cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CSA/MMF, n=151); high-level tacrolimus (TAC, 8-12 μg/L) and low-level sirolimus (SIR, 3-7 μg/L) (TACH/SIRL, n=149) or low-level TAC (3-7 μg/L) and high-level SIR (8-12 μg/L) (TACL/SIR(H) , n=140). Median follow-up was ∼7 years. There were no differences between arms in 10-year actuarial patient, graft and death-censored graft survival or in allograft function. There were no differences in the 10-year actuarial rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (30%, 26% and 20% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH) and chronic rejection (38%, 35% and 31% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH). Rates of new-onset diabetes mellitus were higher with TACH/SIRL (p=0.04), and rates of anemia were higher with TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH (p=0.04). No differences were found in the overall rates of 16 other post-KT complications. These data indicate that RDP-based protocol yield acceptable 10-year outcomes, but side effects differ based on the maintenance regimen used and should be considered when optimizing immunosuppression following RDP. © Copyright 2013 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23432755 PMCID: PMC3621067 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086