Martin Lindström1, Birgit Modén, Maria Rosvall. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. martin.lindstrom@med.lu.se
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate the associations between economic stress in childhood and adulthood and tobacco smoking, with reference to the accumulation, critical period and social mobility hypotheses from life-course epidemiology. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: The 2008 public health survey in Skåne, Sweden is a cross-sectional postal questionnaire study based on a random sample which yielded 28 198 participants aged 18-80 years (55% participation). Logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between economic stress in childhood and adulthood and tobacco smoking. FINDINGS: A 17.4% prevalence of men and 19.1% of women reported tobacco smoking. Tobacco smoking was more prevalent among middle-aged men and young women, among those born outside Sweden, with low occupational status, low social support, low trust, economic stress in childhood and adulthood. The accumulation hypothesis was confirmed because combined childhood and adulthood exposures to economic stress were associated (P < 0.001) with tobacco smoking in a graded manner. The critical period hypothesis was not supported because the associations between economic stress in childhood as well as adulthood, respectively, and tobacco smoking were significant (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001) throughout the analyses. The social mobility hypothesis was confirmed because upward social mobility was associated significantly (P < 0.001) with lower odds of smoking, while downward social mobility was associated significantly (P < 0.001) with higher odds of smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Downward social mobility and economic stress in both childhood and adulthood should be considered as risk factors for tobacco smoking over the life-course.
AIMS: To investigate the associations between economic stress in childhood and adulthood and tobacco smoking, with reference to the accumulation, critical period and social mobility hypotheses from life-course epidemiology. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: The 2008 public health survey in Skåne, Sweden is a cross-sectional postal questionnaire study based on a random sample which yielded 28 198 participants aged 18-80 years (55% participation). Logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between economic stress in childhood and adulthood and tobacco smoking. FINDINGS: A 17.4% prevalence of men and 19.1% of women reported tobacco smoking. Tobacco smoking was more prevalent among middle-aged men and young women, among those born outside Sweden, with low occupational status, low social support, low trust, economic stress in childhood and adulthood. The accumulation hypothesis was confirmed because combined childhood and adulthood exposures to economic stress were associated (P < 0.001) with tobacco smoking in a graded manner. The critical period hypothesis was not supported because the associations between economic stress in childhood as well as adulthood, respectively, and tobacco smoking were significant (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001) throughout the analyses. The social mobility hypothesis was confirmed because upward social mobility was associated significantly (P < 0.001) with lower odds of smoking, while downward social mobility was associated significantly (P < 0.001) with higher odds of smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Downward social mobility and economic stress in both childhood and adulthood should be considered as risk factors for tobacco smoking over the life-course.
Authors: Adam J Spanier; Andrew F Beck; Bin Huang; Meghan E McGrady; Dennis D Drotar; Roy W A Peake; Mark D Kellogg; Robert S Kahn Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jennifer Dacey Allen; Caitlin Caspi; May Yang; Bryan Leyva; Anne M Stoddard; Sara Tamers; Reginald D Tucker-Seeley; Glorian C Sorensen Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Mohammad Siahpush; Paraskevi A Farazi; Shannon I Maloney; Danae Dinkel; Minh N Nguyen; Gopal K Singh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Juliana Kagura; Linda S Adair; Pedro T Pisa; Paula L Griffiths; John M Pettifor; Shane A Norris Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 2.692