Literature DB >> 23432132

Balancing genetic uniqueness and genetic variation in determining conservation and translocation strategies: a comprehensive case study of threatened dwarf galaxias, Galaxiella pusilla (Mack) (Pisces: Galaxiidae).

R A Coleman1, A R Weeks, A A Hoffmann.   

Abstract

Genetic markers are widely used to define and manage populations of threatened species based on the notion that populations with unique lineages of mtDNA and well-differentiated nuclear marker frequencies should be treated separately. However, a danger of this approach is that genetic uniqueness might be emphasized at the cost of genetic diversity, which is essential for adaptation and is potentially boosted by mixing geographically separate populations. Here, we re-explore the issue of defining management units, focussing on a detailed study of Galaxiella pusilla, a small freshwater fish of national conservation significance in Australia. Using a combination of microsatellite and mitochondrial markers, 51 populations across the species range were surveyed for genetic structure and diversity. We found an inverse relationship between genetic differentiation and genetic diversity, highlighting a long-term risk of deliberate isolation of G. pusilla populations based on protection of unique lineages. Instead, we adopt a method for identifying genetic management units that takes into consideration both uniqueness and genetic variation. This produced a management framework to guide future translocation and re-introduction efforts for G. pusilla, which contrasted to the framework based on a more traditional approach that may overlook important genetic variation in populations.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23432132     DOI: 10.1111/mec.12227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  10 in total

1.  Landscape genetics informs mesohabitat preference and conservation priorities for a surrogate indicator species in a highly fragmented river system.

Authors:  J Lean; M P Hammer; P J Unmack; M Adams; L B Beheregaray
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Use of genetic tools to assess predation on reintroduced howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya) in Northeastern Argentina.

Authors:  Luciana Inés Oklander; Mariela Caputo; Martin Kowalewski; Jorge Anfuso; Daniel Corach
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Evolutionary history and genetic connectivity across highly fragmented populations of an endangered daisy.

Authors:  Yael S Rodger; Alexandra Pavlova; Steve Sinclair; Melinda Pickup; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  What can livestock breeders learn from conservation genetics and vice versa?

Authors:  Torsten N Kristensen; Ary A Hoffmann; Cino Pertoldi; Astrid V Stronen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Conservation of genetic uniqueness of populations may increase extinction likelihood of endangered species: the case of Australian mammals.

Authors:  Andrew R Weeks; Jakub Stoklosa; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Phylogeography and Conservation Genetics of the Ibero-Balearic Three-Spined Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Marta Vila; Miguel Hermida; Carlos Fernández; Silvia Perea; Ignacio Doadrio; Rafaela Amaro; Eduardo San Miguel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genetic diversity and structure related to expansion history and habitat isolation: stone marten populating rural-urban habitats.

Authors:  Anna Wereszczuk; Raphaël Leblois; Andrzej Zalewski
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.964

8.  Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: A call for assisted gene flow.

Authors:  Alexandra Pavlova; Luciano B Beheregaray; Rhys Coleman; Dean Gilligan; Katherine A Harrisson; Brett A Ingram; Joanne Kearns; Annika M Lamb; Mark Lintermans; Jarod Lyon; Thuy T T Nguyen; Minami Sasaki; Zeb Tonkin; Jian D L Yen; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Artificial barriers prevent genetic recovery of small isolated populations of a low-mobility freshwater fish.

Authors:  R A Coleman; B Gauffre; A Pavlova; L B Beheregaray; J Kearns; J Lyon; M Sasaki; R Leblois; C Sgro; P Sunnucks
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Conservation genetics as a management tool: The five best-supported paradigms to assist the management of threatened species.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Torsten N Kristensen; Carla M Sgrò; Andrew R Weeks; Michael Ørsted; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 12.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.