Literature DB >> 23432116

Review of guidelines for children's vision screenings.

Shelley Hopkins1, Geoff P Sampson, Peter Hendicott, Joanne M Wood.   

Abstract

The aim of children's vision screenings is to detect visual problems that are common in this age category through valid and reliable tests. Nevertheless, the cost effectiveness of paediatric vision screenings, the nature of the tests included in the screening batteries and the ideal screening age has been the cause of much debate in Australia and worldwide. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to report on the current practice of children's vision screenings in Australia and other countries, as well as to evaluate the evidence for and against the provision of such screenings. This was undertaken through a detailed investigation of peer-reviewed publications on this topic. The current review demonstrates that there is no agreed vision screening protocol for children in Australia. This appears to be a result of the lack of strong evidence supporting the benefit of such screenings. While amblyopia, strabismus and, to a lesser extent refractive error, are targeted by many screening programs during pre-school and at school entry, there is less agreement regarding the value of screening for other visual conditions, such as binocular vision disorders, ocular health problems and refractive errors that are less likely to reduce distance visual acuity. In addition, in Australia, little agreement exists in the frequency and coverage of screening programs between states and territories and the screening programs that are offered are ad hoc and poorly documented. Australian children stand to benefit from improved cohesion and communication between jurisdictions and health professionals to enable an equitable provision of validated vision screening services that have the best chance of early detection and intervention for a range of paediatric visual problems.
© 2013 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2013 Optometrists Association Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amblyopia; children's vision; refraction; strabismus; vision screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23432116     DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  10 in total

1.  Vision Screening of Ophthalmic Nursing Staff in a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital: Outcomes and ocular healthcare-seeking behaviours.

Authors:  Ruhi A Khan; Ches Souru; Sejo Vaghese; Ziaul Yasir; Rajiv Khandekar
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-03-30

2.  ColourSpot, a novel gamified tablet-based test for accurate diagnosis of color vision deficiency in young children.

Authors:  Teresa Tang; Leticia Álvaro; James Alvarez; John Maule; Alice Skelton; Anna Franklin; Jenny Bosten
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-08-31

Review 3.  Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school-age children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jennifer R Evans; Priya Morjaria; Christine Powell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-15

4.  Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.

Authors:  Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Samantha K Simkin; Melissa Thomson; Benjamin Thompson; Andrew V Collins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessment of availability, awareness and perception of stakeholders regarding preschool vision screening in Kumasi, Ghana: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo; Mohammed Abdul-Kabir; Eldad Agyei-Manu; Josiah Henry Tsiquaye; Christine Karikari Darko; Emmanuel Kofi Addo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Comparison of the pediatric vision screening program in 18 countries across five continents.

Authors:  Ai-Hong Chen; Nurul Farhana Abu Bakar; Patricia Arthur
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-03

7.  Evaluation of vision screening of 5-15-year-old children in three Tongan schools: comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and Lea symbols.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Fiona Langridge; Joanna M Black; Nicola S Anstice; Mele Vuki; Toakase Fakakovikaetau; Cameron C Grant; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  Comparison between Plusoptix A09 and gold standard cycloplegic refraction in preschool children and agreement to detect refractive amblyogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Jyothi Thomas; B Rajashekar; Asha Kamath; Parikshit Gogate
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-27

9.  The Evolution and the Impact of Refractive Errors on Academic Performance: A Pilot Study of Portuguese School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Clara Martinez-Perez; Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina; Rita Brito; Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06

10.  Visual Health and Academic Performance in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina; Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena; Cristina Andreu-Vázquez; Cesar Villa-Collar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.