Tenley N Bower1, Sana Muhsen, Olga Overbury, Catherine Birt, Oscar Kasner. 1. *Department of Ophthalmology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC †Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our goal is to investigate the opinion and practice pattern of Canadian ophthalmologists regarding the use of and recommendations for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for their glaucoma patients. METHODS: Institutional review board approval for this prospective, cross-sectional survey was obtained from the Research Ethics Board of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. The survey was sent to all ophthalmologists in Canada electronically through the e-mail lists of 4 ophthalmology associations. RESULTS: A total of 241 ophthalmologists representing all provinces in Canada responded to the questionnaire. Twenty-two percent felt that CAM does have a role in glaucoma therapy with specialists being more likely to believe there is a role (P<0.05). Of the total respondents, 26% ask their patients if they use CAM with those in practice for <20 years more likely to encourage use (P<0.05). Of the respondents, 9% recommend CAM and if an ophthalmologist was in practice for <20 years he/she was significantly more likely to recommend CAM (P<0.01). Respondents (62%) in general do not discourage CAM with younger ophthalmologists (younger than 50 y, P<0.02) and ophthalmologists in practice for <20 years (P<0.05) being less likely to discourage CAM use. Respondents (41%) believe that CAM rarely ever affects compliance with ophthalmologists from an urban practice (P<0.01) and academic practice (P<0.05) more likely to deny effect on compliance. Respondents believe that CAM sometimes (46%) results in patient morbidity with ophthalmologists being in practice for <20 years believing that morbidity is less likely (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: A substantial minority of respondents believe that CAM has a role in glaucoma therapy, recommend its use, and ask their patients if they use CAM. Younger doctors are more likely to encourage alternatives; those in practice for <20 years are more likely to ask about alternative medicine use, recommend its use, and believe that morbidity usually does not result from the use of alternative treatments.
PURPOSE: Our goal is to investigate the opinion and practice pattern of Canadian ophthalmologists regarding the use of and recommendations for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for their glaucomapatients. METHODS: Institutional review board approval for this prospective, cross-sectional survey was obtained from the Research Ethics Board of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. The survey was sent to all ophthalmologists in Canada electronically through the e-mail lists of 4 ophthalmology associations. RESULTS: A total of 241 ophthalmologists representing all provinces in Canada responded to the questionnaire. Twenty-two percent felt that CAM does have a role in glaucoma therapy with specialists being more likely to believe there is a role (P<0.05). Of the total respondents, 26% ask their patients if they use CAM with those in practice for <20 years more likely to encourage use (P<0.05). Of the respondents, 9% recommend CAM and if an ophthalmologist was in practice for <20 years he/she was significantly more likely to recommend CAM (P<0.01). Respondents (62%) in general do not discourage CAM with younger ophthalmologists (younger than 50 y, P<0.02) and ophthalmologists in practice for <20 years (P<0.05) being less likely to discourage CAM use. Respondents (41%) believe that CAM rarely ever affects compliance with ophthalmologists from an urban practice (P<0.01) and academic practice (P<0.05) more likely to deny effect on compliance. Respondents believe that CAM sometimes (46%) results in patient morbidity with ophthalmologists being in practice for <20 years believing that morbidity is less likely (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: A substantial minority of respondents believe that CAM has a role in glaucoma therapy, recommend its use, and ask their patients if they use CAM. Younger doctors are more likely to encourage alternatives; those in practice for <20 years are more likely to ask about alternative medicine use, recommend its use, and believe that morbidity usually does not result from the use of alternative treatments.