Literature DB >> 23429326

Nipple discharge: role of ductoscopy in comparison with standard diagnostic tests.

Christine Albrecht1, Franziska Thele, Susanne Grunwald, Thomas Kohlmann, Katrin Hegenscheid, Kirsten Utpatel, Marek Zygmunt, Ralf Ohlinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the role of ductoscopy for detecting intraductal anomalies in patients with nipple discharge in comparison to conventional tests and to find an effective combination of both approaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prior to duct excision, ductoscopy was performed in 97 women. Histologic and all other diagnostic results were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency were calculated for all methods. These parameters were also calculated for all possible test combinations in 12 patients who had completed all tests.
RESULTS: Breast sonography reached the highest sensitivity (64.1%) and efficiency (64%); mammography had the highest specificity (100%). The sensitivity of ductoscopy was 53.2%, its specificity 60%, and its efficiency 55.1%. Among combinations of all methods, the combination ductoscopy + galactography was the most sensitive (80%). Mammography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ductoscopy were each 100% specific. Ductoscopy was the most efficient (75%) single method.
CONCLUSION: Ductoscopy is a valuable test for diagnosing intraductal lesions in patients with nipple discharge. It is more efficient than conventional tests in patients undergoing all tests.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23429326     DOI: 10.1159/000346639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onkologie        ISSN: 0378-584X


  7 in total

1.  3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail.

Authors:  Nóra Lubina; Ulla Schedelbeck; Anne Roth; Andreas Max Weng; Eva Geissinger; Arnd Hönig; Dietbert Hahn; Thorsten Alexander Bley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation and management of pathological nipple discharges without using intraductal imaging methods.

Authors:  Kenan Çetin; Hasan Ediz Sıkar
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Diagnosis of Nipple Discharge: Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Comparison with Ductoscopy.

Authors:  Ravza Yılmaz; Ömer Bender; Fatma Çelik Yabul; Menduh Dursun; Mehtap Tunacı; Gülden Acunas
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.021

4.  Feasibility of Narrow-Band Imaging, Intraductal Biopsy, and Laser Ablation During Mammary Ductoscopy: Protocol for an Interventional Study.

Authors:  S Makineli; M D Filipe; F Euwe; A Sakes; J Dankelman; P Breedveld; M R Vriens; P J van Diest; A J Witkamp
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge.

Authors:  Hongmei Yuan; Xuemei Tang; Xurong Mou; Yuhong Fan; Xiang Yan; Jinsui Li; Lingmi Hou; Min Ren
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.795

6.  Use of fiberoductoscopy for the management of patients with pathological nipple discharge: experience of a single center in Poland.

Authors:  Jacek Zielinski; Radoslaw Jaworski; Ninela Irga-Jaworska; Michal Pikula; Michael Hunerbein; Janusz Jaskiewicz
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 7.  Meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness of ductoscopy, duct excision surgery and MRI for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pathological nipple discharge.

Authors:  M D Filipe; S I S Patuleia; M R Vriens; P J van Diest; A J Witkamp
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.872

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.