Literature DB >> 23428798

Effects of DCPD cement chemistry on degradation properties and cytocompatibility: comparison of MCPM/β-TCP and MCPM/HA formulations.

Daniel L Alge1, W Scott Goebel, Tien-Min Gabriel Chu.   

Abstract

Dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD) cements are attractive biomaterials for bone repair, and a number of different DCPD cement formulations have been proposed in the literature. In this study, we have specifically compared monocalcium phosphate monohydrate (MCPM)/hydroxyapatite (HA) and MCPM/β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) formulations to test the hypothesis that DCPD cement chemistry affects the degradation properties and cytocompatibility of the cement. Using simple in vitro models we found that MCPM/β-TCP formulations degraded primarily by DCPD dissolution, which was associated with a slight pH drop and relatively low mass loss. Cytocompatibility testing of cement conditioned culture media revealed no significant change in cell viability relative to the negative control for all of the MCPM/β-TCP formulations. In contrast, the MCPM/HA formulations were prone to undergo rapid conversion of DCPD to HA, resulting in a sharp pH drop and extensive mass loss. A stoichiometric excess of HA in the cement was found to accelerate the conversion process, and significant cytotoxicity was observed for the MCPM/HA formulations containing excess HA. Collectively, these results show that, although the product of the setting reaction is the same, DCPD cements produced with MCPM/HA and MCPM/β-TCP formulations differ significantly in their degradation properties and cytocompatibility. These differences may have important implications for the selection of a DCPD cement formulation for clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23428798      PMCID: PMC3649140          DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/8/2/025010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  31 in total

1.  Calcium phosphate bone cements for clinical applications. Part I: solution chemistry.

Authors:  E Fernández; F J Gil; M P Ginebra; F C Driessens; J A Planell; S M Best
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Raman microspectrometry studies of brushite cement: in vivo evolution in a sheep model.

Authors:  G Penel; N Leroy; P Van Landuyt; B Flautre; P Hardouin; J Lemaître; G Leroy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Biologically mediated resorption of brushite cement in vitro.

Authors:  Liam M Grover; Uwe Gbureck; Adrian J Wright; Maryjane Tremayne; Jake E Barralet
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair.

Authors:  Amy J Wagoner Johnson; Brad A Herschler
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Biocompatibility and resorption of a brushite calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  Felix Theiss; Detlef Apelt; Bastian Brand; Annette Kutter; Katalin Zlinszky; Marc Bohner; Sandro Matter; Christian Frei; Joerg A Auer; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Cements from nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  J E Barralet; K J Lilley; L M Grover; D F Farrar; C Ansell; U Gbureck
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  In vitro aging of a calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  M Bohner; H P Merkle; J Lemaître
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Characterization of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cements prepared using a novel hydroxyapatite-based formulation.

Authors:  Daniel L Alge; Grace Santa Cruz; W Scott Goebel; Tien-Min Gabriel Chu
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.715

9.  Beta-tricalcium phosphate release from brushite cement surface.

Authors:  M Hamdan Alkhraisat; F Tamimi Mariño; J Rubio Retama; L Blanco Jerez; E López-Cabarcos
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  In vivo behavior of three different injectable hydraulic calcium phosphate cements.

Authors:  D Apelt; F Theiss; A O El-Warrak; K Zlinszky; R Bettschart-Wolfisberger; M Bohner; S Matter; J A Auer; B von Rechenberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  4 in total

1.  Self-setting calcium orthophosphate formulations.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2013-11-12

2.  Fabrication of Poly-l-lactic Acid/Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate Composite Scaffolds with High Mechanical Strength-Implications for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Nida Tanataweethum; Wai Ching Liu; W Scott Goebel; Ding Li; Tien Min Chu
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2015-11-04

3.  Long-Term In Vitro Degradation of a High-Strength Brushite Cement in Water, PBS, and Serum Solution.

Authors:  Ingrid Ajaxon; Caroline Öhman; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Main 3D Manufacturing Techniques for Customized Bone Substitutes. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Javier Montero; Alicia Becerro; Beatriz Pardal-Peláez; Norberto Quispe-López; Juan-Francisco Blanco; Cristina Gómez-Polo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.