BACKGROUND: Full thickness cartilage lesions (ICRS grade 3-4) and focal lesions of degenerative origin may progress to osteoarthritis (OA). Such focal lesions can be treated by metallic implants. We hypothesized that such treatment results in opposing surface cartilage damage that correlates with implant position (height) relative to the adjacent cartilage surface. This relationship was investigated using a sheep animal model. METHODS: Both medial femoral condyles of 12 sheep were operated. The implants, were inserted in the weight-bearing surface at different heights relative to the surrounding cartilage. Euthanasia was performed at 6 or 12 weeks. After retrieval, implant height was analyzed using laser scanning. Damage to the opposing tibial cartilage was evaluated macroscopically and microscopically according to the modified Mankin score. RESULTS: Twenty-two knees were available for evaluation and showed cartilage lesions ranging from severe damage (Mankin stage 11) to almost pristine conditions (Mankin stage 1). There was a strong correlation between implant height and cartilage damage. Standard deviation from the aimed implant height was 0.47 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed significant surgical imprecision and protruding implants imposed severe cartilage damage. We therefore suggest implants should be placed recessed (approx. 0.5 mm) below the surrounding cartilage in this animal model. These results encourage further studies of metallic implants yet the utmost precision regarding position is required.
BACKGROUND: Full thickness cartilage lesions (ICRS grade 3-4) and focal lesions of degenerative origin may progress to osteoarthritis (OA). Such focal lesions can be treated by metallic implants. We hypothesized that such treatment results in opposing surface cartilage damage that correlates with implant position (height) relative to the adjacent cartilage surface. This relationship was investigated using a sheep animal model. METHODS: Both medial femoral condyles of 12 sheep were operated. The implants, were inserted in the weight-bearing surface at different heights relative to the surrounding cartilage. Euthanasia was performed at 6 or 12 weeks. After retrieval, implant height was analyzed using laser scanning. Damage to the opposing tibial cartilage was evaluated macroscopically and microscopically according to the modified Mankin score. RESULTS: Twenty-two knees were available for evaluation and showed cartilage lesions ranging from severe damage (Mankin stage 11) to almost pristine conditions (Mankin stage 1). There was a strong correlation between implant height and cartilage damage. Standard deviation from the aimed implant height was 0.47 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed significant surgical imprecision and protruding implants imposed severe cartilage damage. We therefore suggest implants should be placed recessed (approx. 0.5 mm) below the surrounding cartilage in this animal model. These results encourage further studies of metallic implants yet the utmost precision regarding position is required.
Authors: Nicolas Martinez-Carranza; Kjell Hultenby; Anne Sofie Lagerstedt; Peter Schupbach; Hans E Berg Journal: Cartilage Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Nicolas Martinez-Carranza; Peter Rockborn; David Roberts; Magnus Högström; Anders Stålman Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Susanna Pilichi; Stefano Rocca; Roy R Pool; Maria Dattena; Gerolamo Masala; Laura Mara; Daniela Sanna; Sara Casu; Maria L Manunta; Andrea Manunta; Eraldo Sanna Passino Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Theresa Diermeier; Arne Venjakob; Kevin Byrne; Rainer Burgkart; Peter Foehr; Stefan Milz; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 2.362