Literature DB >> 23427773

Ecological validity of pediatric neuropsychological measures: current state and future directions.

Katie Olson1, Kristin K Jacobson, Peter Van Oot.   

Abstract

Neuropsychologists are increasingly requested to identify specific deficits in cognitive abilities and determine the ways in which these deficits will affect a client's everyday functioning. The demand for prescriptive diagnostic endeavors that provide recommendations for rehabilitation has drawn attention to the necessity of considering the ecological validity of instruments. Most of the current knowledge regarding the ecological validity of neuropsychological measures is the result of studies examining adult and older adult populations. The relationship of test performance and everyday functioning in children has been less examined and is, therefore, less understood. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief history of ecological validity in neuropsychology, discuss why this is an important consideration when working with child populations, and provide suggestions for continued research in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23427773     DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2012.686330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Child        ISSN: 2162-2965            Impact factor:   1.493


  7 in total

1.  Examining the relationship between social communication on the ADOS and real-world reciprocal social communication in children with ASD.

Authors:  Lydia R Qualls; Blythe A Corbett
Journal:  Res Autism Spectr Disord       Date:  2016-10-28

Review 2.  Functional plasticity in childhood brain disorders: when, what, how, and whom to assess.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis; Brenda J Spiegler; Nevena Simic; Katia J Sinopoli; Amy Wilkinson; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Erin D Bigler; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  The clinical utility of the Children's Communication Checklist-2 in children with early childhood traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Allison P Fisher; Lisa M Gies; Leah Chapman; Jessica M Aguilar; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Shari L Wade
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 4.373

4.  Sorting Test, Tower Test, and BRIEF-SR do not predict school performance of healthy adolescents in preuniversity education.

Authors:  Annemarie Boschloo; Lydia Krabbendam; Aukje Aben; Renate de Groot; Jelle Jolles
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-08

5.  Examining the relationship between face processing and social interaction behavior in children with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Blythe A Corbett; Cassandra Newsom; Alexandra P Key; Lydia R Qualls; E Kale Edmiston
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Monitoring neurocognitive functioning in childhood cancer survivors: evaluation of CogState computerized assessment and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF).

Authors:  Lyn M Balsamo; Hannah-Rose Mitchell; Wilhelmenia Ross; Catherine Metayer; Kristina K Hardy; Nina S Kadan-Lottick
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2019-05-02

7.  Only Words Count; the Rest Is Mere Chattering: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to the Verbal Expression of Emotional Experience.

Authors:  Daniela Laricchiuta; Andrea Termine; Carlo Fabrizio; Noemi Passarello; Francesca Greco; Fabrizio Piras; Eleonora Picerni; Debora Cutuli; Andrea Marini; Laura Mandolesi; Gianfranco Spalletta; Laura Petrosini
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.