Literature DB >> 23427044

Comparison of fluorigenic peptide substrates PL50, SNAPTide, and BoTest A/E for BoNT/A detection and quantification: exosite binding confers high-assay sensitivity.

Tanja Ouimet1, Sophie Duquesnoy, Hervé Poras, Marie-Claude Fournié-Zaluski, Bernard P Roques.   

Abstract

Detection and quantification of low doses of botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT/A) in medicinal preparations require precise and sensitive methods. With mounting pressure from governmental authorities to replace the mouse LD50 assay, interest in alternative methods such as the endopeptidase assay, quantifying the toxin active moiety, is growing. Using internal collision-induced fluorescence quenching, Pharmaleads produced peptides encompassing the SNAP-25 cleavage site: a 17-mer (PL63) and a 48-mer (PL50) reaching the previously identified α-exosite, with PL50 showing higher apparent affinity for BoNT/A. Peptide mapping experiments revealed that this increased affinity is mainly due to a connecting peptide sequence between the N-terminus of PL63 and the α-exosite, identifying a new cooperative exosite on BoNT/A. Other endopeptidase substrates available, including SNAPTide and BoTest A/E, are both based on fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) technology. To compare these assays, their limits of detection and quantification were determined using light chain or 150-kDa BoNT/A. Detection limits of PL50 and BoTest were over 100 times better than those using SNAPtide in standard conditions. Although the BoTest possessed a detection limit around 0.2 pM for either BoNT/A form, its quantification limit (9.7 pM) using purified BoNT/A was 12 times inferior to PL50, estimated at 0.8 pM, suitable for medicinal preparation quantification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  botulinum toxin A; endopeptidase assay; fluorescence; quantification; quenched substrates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23427044     DOI: 10.1177/1087057113476089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  5 in total

1.  Isolation and quantification of botulinum neurotoxin from complex matrices using the BoTest matrix assays.

Authors:  F Mark Dunning; Timothy M Piazza; Füsûn N Zeytin; Ward C Tucker
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Discovery of an enzyme and substrate selective inhibitor of ADAM10 using an exosite-binding glycosylated substrate.

Authors:  Franck Madoux; Daniela Dreymuller; Jean-Phillipe Pettiloud; Radleigh Santos; Christoph Becker-Pauly; Andreas Ludwig; Gregg B Fields; Thomas Bannister; Timothy P Spicer; Mare Cudic; Louis D Scampavia; Dmitriy Minond
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  An Ultrasensitive Gold Nanoparticle-based Lateral Flow Test for the Detection of Active Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Shan Gao; Lin Kang; Bin Ji; Wenwen Xin; Jingjing Kang; Ping Li; Jie Gao; Hanbin Wang; Jinglin Wang; Hao Yang
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.703

4.  Functional detection of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A to F by monoclonal neoepitope-specific antibodies and suspension array technology.

Authors:  Laura von Berg; Daniel Stern; Diana Pauly; Stefan Mahrhold; Jasmin Weisemann; Lisa Jentsch; Eva-Maria Hansbauer; Christian Müller; Marc A Avondet; Andreas Rummel; Martin B Dorner; Brigitte G Dorner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Optimization of SNAP-25 and VAMP-2 Cleavage by Botulinum Neurotoxin Serotypes A-F Employing Taguchi Design-of-Experiments.

Authors:  Laura von Berg; Daniel Stern; Jasmin Weisemann; Andreas Rummel; Martin Bernhard Dorner; Brigitte Gertrud Dorner
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.