Literature DB >> 23426460

Mortality and readmission rates after hospitalization for upper and lower gastrointestinal events in Quebec, Canada.

Elham Rahme1, Jean-Pascal Roussy, John Woolcott, Hacene Nedjar, Alan Barkun.   

Abstract

GOALS: We determined yearly rates of upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) hospitalizations in Quebec, Canada and compared the 1-year readmission and mortality risks among those discharged from lower versus upper GI hospitalizations.
BACKGROUND: The burden of serious upper and lower GI events is substantial. STUDY: Demographic, medical, pharmaceutical, and hospital records were used in a retrospective cohort study to assess risks of mortality and hospital readmission for upper and lower GI events among patients 50 years and older during 1998 to 2006.
RESULTS: Among included 39,771 GI hospitalizations, 5238 were from 1998 to 1999, and 5050 from 2005 to 2006. Rates of upper GI hospitalizations decreased in the study period, whereas that of lower GI events did not change. The risk of in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with small bowel versus upper GI events [odds ratio 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.81-2.47] and lower in patients with colon/rectal events 0.30 (0.25-0.36). One-year mortality risk after discharge was lower in patients with lower versus upper GI events (small bowel hazard ratio 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93; and colon/rectal: 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83). Compared to upper GI events, the risk of hospital readmission was higher in those with small bowel 1.53 (1.19-1.97) and similar in those with colon/rectal events 1.12 (0.96-1.31).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of upper GI events may be decreasing, but remains over 3 times as high as that of lower GI events and among those admitted for GI events, about 80% of in-hospital mortality occurred in those with upper GI problems. Although GI events in the small bowel are less frequent than those in upper or lower GI tract, they are the most severe and are associated with higher risks of mortality and hospital readmissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23426460     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318282a1d7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  4 in total

1.  Does the timing of an invasive mesenteric angiography following a positive CT mesenteric angiography make a difference?

Authors:  Frederick H Koh; Junwei Soong; Bettina Lieske; Wai-Kit Cheong; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Improved outcomes following implementation of an acute gastrointestinal bleeding multidisciplinary protocol.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Kristina L Go; Steven J Hughes; Chasen A Croft; Robert Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Frederick A Moore; Scott C Brakenridge; Alicia M Mohr; Janeen R Jordan
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 3.  Prophylactic use of aspirin: systematic review of harms and approaches to mitigation in the general population.

Authors:  Mangesh A Thorat; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital Readmissions Following Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Sandeep Kaur; Cody L Dunne; Lauren Bresee
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.