Literature DB >> 23426428

Evaluation of a dried blood spot assay to measure prenatal screening markers pregnancy-associated plasma protein a and free β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.

Nicholas J Cowans1, Mikko Suonpaa, Heikki Kouru, David Wright, Kevin Spencer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-trimester prenatal screening for aneuploidy by use of dried blood spots (DBSs) may offer practical benefits in settings where the instability of intact human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is problematic. We evaluated a DBS pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and free β-subunit of hCG (free hCGβ) dual assay and compared it to serum screening.
METHODS: Hematocrit-corrected DBS PAPP-A and free-hCGβ concentrations were measured and compared with serum concentrations in 252 first-trimester samples. Serum intact hCG was also measured and, with serum free hCGβ, was used to fit a model to predict serum-equivalent DBS free-hCGβ concentrations. In a separate experiment, we investigated the effects of temperature and relative humidity during the blood spot drying process.
RESULTS: The DBS assay for PAPP-A performed similarly to the serum assay, whereas free-hCGβ DBS measurements were consistently higher than in serum. Purifying blood spots of intact hCG suggested that the free-hCGβ DBS assay is measuring a composite of free hCGβ and additional β-subunits from intact hCG. The drying experiment showed that increased temperature and relative humidity during the drying process resulted in increased free hCGβ and reduced PAPP-A.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite measuring additional free hCGβ compared to the serum assay, DBS analysis has a role in first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21.
© 2013 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23426428     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.194894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of different blood collection, sample matrix, and immunoassay methods in a prenatal screening setting.

Authors:  Jeroen L A Pennings; Jacqueline E Siljee; Sandra Imholz; Sylwia Kuc; Annemieke de Vries; Peter C J I Schielen; Wendy Rodenburg
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.434

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.