Literature DB >> 23425335

Investigation of rare variants in LRP1, KPNA1, ALS2CL and ZNF480 genes in schizophrenia patients reflects genetic heterogeneity of the disease.

Loubna Jouan1, Simon L Girard, Sylvia Dobrzeniecka, Amirthagowri Ambalavanan, Marie-Odile Krebs, Ridha Joober, Julie Gauthier, Patrick A Dion, Guy A Rouleau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disease characterized by a high heritability and a complex genetic architecture. Recent reports based on exome sequencing analyses have highlighted a significant increase of potentially deleterious de novo mutations in different genes in individuals with schizophrenia.
FINDINGS: This report presents the mutation screening results of four candidate genes for which such de novo mutations were previously reported (LRP1, KPNA1, ALS2CL and ZNF480). We have not identified any excess of rare variants in the additional SCZ cases we have screened.
CONCLUSIONS: This supports the notion that de novo mutations in these four genes are extremely rare in schizophrenia and further highlights the high degree of genetic heterogeneity of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23425335      PMCID: PMC3599135          DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-9-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Funct        ISSN: 1744-9081            Impact factor:   3.759


Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorder that is characterized by severely impaired cognitive processes causing hallucinations, delusions and altered emotional reactivity that disturb social behavior. This disorder is highly prevalent and according to the National Institute of Mental Health affects 1.1% of the U.S. adult population. The genetic factors predisposing to SCZ have not been fully elucidated but twin, adoptee and family studies jointly suggest that genetics is important with a heritability estimated to be up to 80% [1,2]. Multiple approaches have been used to identify common and rare SCZ-predisposing variants using candidate gene and whole genome-scale studies [3,4]. However neither large-scale sequencing projects, looking for rare penetrant variants, nor genome wide association studies, looking for common variants, have accounted for a significant fraction of the heritability of SCZ. In light of this limited success, it was hypothesized that deleterious de novo mutations in any of several different genes could explain the high global incidence of SCZ despite a reduced reproductive fitness. Our group first reported the presence of a significant excess of potentially deleterious de novo mutations in 401 synaptic genes using Sanger sequencing in a cohort of SCZ and autism patients [5]. We have later confirmed an excess of exonic de novo mutations and more particularly of nonsense variants in 15 SCZ trios (probands and parents) using exome sequencing. Interestingly, 4:11 ratio of nonsense to missense mutations is significantly higher than the expected 1:20 ratio (P = 0.005467), and according to the Human Gene Mutation Database, the expected ratio of nonsense to missense among all mutations reported to cause Mendelian diseases is 1:4 which in line with what we found (P > 0.05, not significant). This identified four candidate genes (LRP1, KPNA1, ALS2CL and ZNF480) possibly involved in SCZ [6]. The present report describes the mutation screening of these four genes in additional 475 SCZ cases and 189 controls. Probands were individually interviewed and their diagnosis was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Exclusion criteria included patients with psychotic symptoms caused by alcohol, drug abuse or other clinical diagnosis. All samples were collected through informed consent following the approval of their respective institutional ethics review committees. An initial cohort of 189 SCZ patients of European Caucasian ancestry was used in this study. An additional cohort of 285 SCZ subjects, also of European Caucasian ancestry, was used for the screening of ALS2CL and ZNF480 genes. All coding regions and splice site junctions of LRP1, KPNA1, ALS2CL and ZNF480 genes were amplified and then sequenced using Sanger sequencing technology. Variant detection analysis was done using Mutation Surveyor (v. 3.23, Softgenetics) and rare exonic variants were confirmed by re-amplification of the relevant fragment in both probands and parents (when available) using forward and reverse oligos. The first gene, LRP1 (NM002332, 89 exons) encodes for Homo Sapiens low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 and is located at 12q13-14. We identified four rare LRP1 variants (S278I, R379H, M1795I and G3948D) absent from public databases (dbSNP [7], 1000 genome project [8] and Exome Variant Server (EVS) [9]) and two additional variants (G169D and A2160T) only reported in EVS at a very low frequency (Table 1). Interestingly, the missense G169D is predicted to affect protein function by SIFT (0.01) and Polyphen (2.337) predicting softwares [10,11]. Unfortunately the parents’ DNAs were not available for an inheritance study. We also identified eight other LRP1 variants that were previously deposited in EVS database and their minor-allele frequencies ranged from 1 to 159 / 10 755 to 10 599 total alleles. Two of these, G3725E and R1993W, are predicted to affect protein function despite minor-allele frequencies of 12/ 10 746 and 25/ 10 733, respectively. However, the fact that G3725E is transmitted by an unaffected mother, suggests it is unlikely to play a major role in SCZ. Unlike the original published findings, we did not find any highly damaging variant (ie. nonsense or insertion/deletion) in LRP1 gene. The KPNA1 gene screening (NM002264; 14 exons), which encodes for karyopherin alpha 1 protein and is located at 3q21, did not lead to the identification of rare variants in our SCZ cohort. The sequencing of ALS2CL (NM147129; 26 exons), encoding for ALS2 C-terminal like protein and located at 3p21.31, revealed one nonsense mutation (E65X) in one SCZ patient. Because of this ALS2CL variant, we opted to screen the full gene in 286 additional SCZ patients and 189 control individuals. We observed a minor-allele frequency of 4/475 SCZ patients and of 1/189 controls for E65X. This variant has been lately added to dbSNP (rs139496961) and EVS databases with a minor allele-frequency of 20/10 738. The presence of E65X in a control individual from our ethnically-matched control cohort makes ALS2CL gene less likely to predispose to SCZ. We also observed three additional rare ALS2CL variants in our 189 initial cases (T268S, T460M and P580S) but their pathogenicity is unlikely since none of the prediction software predicted them to be deleterious. Finally, the screening of ZNF480 (NM144684; 4 coding exons) a zinc finger protein which is located at 19q13.41, led to the identification of two nonsense variants in one SCZ patient and one control individual (R276X and R500X, respectively). During our gene screening process, five nonsense variations (R304X, R360X, R416X, K434X and Q528X) were deposited in the EVS database by other groups with frequencies ranging from 1/10 755 to 2/10 756. Although we cannot rule out that schizophrenic or borderline personalities can be found in public databases such as EVS, the fact that five additional nonsense variations were found in the C-terminal region of this gene is not in favor of a deleterious effect of a de novo nonsense mutation in this region. For this reason we did not further investigate this gene in additional SCZ cases and control individuals and concluded that ZNF480 was a poor candidate for SCZ.
Table 1

Mutations identified in LRP1, ALS2CL, ZNF480 and KPNA1 and occurrence in SCZ and CTR cohorts

Mutation detailsPrediction scoresOccurrence
Gene
Genomic Positiona
Nucleotide variantb
AA Change
Typed
dbSNPe
ESVf
1000 genomesg
Inheritanceh
Pantheri
Siftj
PolyPhenk
SCZ l cohort
CTR cohort
LRP1
chr12:57,579,450
 
Y2200Xc
NS
 
 
 
de novo
 
 
 
 
 
LRP1
chr12:57,538,812
c.506G > A
G169D
MS
-
A = 2 / G = 10756
-
N/A
-
0.01
2.337
1/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,539,265
c.833G > T
S278I
MS
-
-
-
T (mother)
−2.47064
0.08
1.73
1/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,548,392
c.1135G > A
R379H
MS
-
-
-
N/A
−2.23136
0.07
1.571
1/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,574,263
c.5386 + 1G > A
M1795I
MS
-
-
-
T (mother)
-
0.06
1.968
1/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,577,915
c.5977C > T
R1993W
MS
rs141826184
T = 25 / C = 10733
T = 1 / C = 1093
N/A
-
0.05
0.037
2/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,578,673
c.6238G > A
D2080N
MS
rs34577247
A = 159 / G = 10599
A = 26 / G = 2162
N/A
-
0.45
0.375
>5
-
LRP1
chr12:57,579,328
c.6478G > A
A2160T
MS
-
A = 1 / G = 10495
-
N/A
-
0.60
1.147
1/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,587,040
c.7637G > A
G2546S
MS
rs113379328
A = 24 / G = 10734
-
N/A
-
0.13
0.836
>5
-
LRP1
chr12:57,587,717
c.7840G > A
R2613Q
MS
rs150340911
A = 12 / G = 10746
-
N/A
-
0.36
0.898
2/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,588,275
c.8057G > A
R2686H
MS
rs148104493
A = 1 / G = 10755
-
N/A
-
0.12
0.999
1/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,589,784
c.8699A > C
Q2900P
MS
rs7397167
A = 123 / C = 10635
A = 14 / C = 2174
N/A
-
0.53
-
>5
-
LRP1
chr12:57,590,916
c.9044G > A
G3015S
MS
rs145303173
A = 6 / G = 10752
-
N/A
-
0.76
0.357
2/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,598,513
c.11175G > A
G3725E
MS
rs151301245
A = 12 / G = 10746
-
T (mother)
-
0.03
1.583
1/189
-
LRP1
chr12:57,600,508
c.11843G > A
G3948D
MS
-
-
-
N/A
-
0.50
1.357
1/189
-
ALS2CL
chr3:46,717,166
 
R733Xc
NS
 
 
 
de novo
 
 
 
 
 
ALS2CL
chr3:46,717,175
c.2188C > T
G730S
MS
rs142971127
T = 80 / C = 10678
T = 12 / C = 2176
N/A
-
0.40
1.483
7/475
1/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,718,458
c.1812G > T
P605T
MS
-
-
-
N/A
−1.70789
0.42
1.761
0/475
1/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,718,477
c.1793C > T
R598H
MS
-
-
-
N/A
−2.73328
0.01
1.686
0/475
1/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,719,769
c.1737G > A
P580S
MS
-
-
-
T (mother)
-
0.62
1.615
1/475
0/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,719,861
c.1645T > C
N549S
MS
rs140347863
C = 9 / T = 10749
-
T (father). N/A. T (mother). N/A
-
0.35
1.851
3/475
1/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,722,792
c.1380G > A
T460M
MS
-
A = 1 / G = 10757
-
T (father)
−2.00878
0.11
0.374
1/475
0/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,725,290
c.894G > A
A298V
MS
rs141781567
A = 15 / G = 10757
-
N/A
−1.6125
0.14
1.366
2/475
0/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,725,522
c.802T > A
T268S
MS
-
-
-
T (mother)
−1.48254
0.33
1.406
1/475
0/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,728,477
c.530A > G
I176T
MS
rs145807890
G = 8 / A = 10746
-
N/A
−1.28647
0.39
1.351
0/475
1/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,729,700
c.190C > A
E65X
NS
rs139496961
A = 20 / C = 10738
-
N/A. T (father). N/A. N/A
-
-
-
4/475
1/189
ALS2CL
chr3:46,729,756
c.134C > G
E45Q
MS
rs7642448
G = 4590 / C = 6166
-
N/A
-
0.28
1.042
>5
>5
ZNF480
chr19:52,826,001
 
R500Xc
NS
 
 
 
de novo
 
 
 
 
 
ZNF480
chr19:52,825,329
c.826C > T
R276X
NS
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
1/475
0/189
ZNF480
chr19:52,825,495
c.992C > A
A331E
MS
-
-
-
N/A
-
0.95
0.838
0/475
1/189
ZNF480
chr19:52,826,001
c.1498C > T
R500X
NS
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
0/475
1/189
KPNA1
chr3:122,146,472
 
E448Xc
NS
 
 
 
de novo
 
 
 
 
 
KPNA1chr3:122,186,188c.218C > TS73NMSrs4678193T = 79 / C = 10677T = 11 / C = 2177N/A−2.167460.450.174>5-

a according to build Hg19; b variant position according to Mutalyzer 2.0.beta-20 [12] and to Genbank accession number NM_002332.2 for LRP1, NM_147129.3 for ALS2CL, NM_144684.2 for ZNF480 and NM_002264.3 for KPNA1; c MS: missense and NS: nonsense; d nonsense mutations previously identified by exome sequencing [6]; e rs number as obtained in dbSNP database [7]; f observed allele counts according to Exome Variant Server in all populations [9]; g observed allele counts according to 1000 genomes in all populations [8]; h inheritance study when parents available; i according to Panther, sub-PSEC score is the probability that a given coding variant will cause a deleterious functional change when less than −3 [13]; j according to Sift scores (from 0 to 1), the amino acid substitution is predicted to be damaging if the score is < = 0.05 and tolerated if the score is > 0.05 [11]; k according to polyphen, if PSIC score difference is > 1.5, the variation is predicted to be possibly or probably damaging [10,11]. l > 5 indicates that the variant has been identified in more than 5 individuals.

Mutations identified in LRP1, ALS2CL, ZNF480 and KPNA1 and occurrence in SCZ and CTR cohorts a according to build Hg19; b variant position according to Mutalyzer 2.0.beta-20 [12] and to Genbank accession number NM_002332.2 for LRP1, NM_147129.3 for ALS2CL, NM_144684.2 for ZNF480 and NM_002264.3 for KPNA1; c MS: missense and NS: nonsense; d nonsense mutations previously identified by exome sequencing [6]; e rs number as obtained in dbSNP database [7]; f observed allele counts according to Exome Variant Server in all populations [9]; g observed allele counts according to 1000 genomes in all populations [8]; h inheritance study when parents available; i according to Panther, sub-PSEC score is the probability that a given coding variant will cause a deleterious functional change when less than −3 [13]; j according to Sift scores (from 0 to 1), the amino acid substitution is predicted to be damaging if the score is < = 0.05 and tolerated if the score is > 0.05 [11]; k according to polyphen, if PSIC score difference is > 1.5, the variation is predicted to be possibly or probably damaging [10,11]. l > 5 indicates that the variant has been identified in more than 5 individuals. While the results of this mutation screening effort did not lead to the identification of additional potentially deleterious de novo mutations in LRP1, KPNA1, ALS2CL and ZNF480 in a larger cohort of SCZ patients, it was a necessary first step to assess their possible contribution to disease. One limitation of this study is that we have focused only on the coding regions. This does not exclude the involvement of disease predisposing variants in non-coding regions, which could affect allelic expression or splicing. Given the known heterogeneity of SCZ and the frequencies of variants reported thus far, the contribution of these particular genes may only emerge after the progressive sequencing of coding and non-coding regions of these genes in much larger cohorts of SCZ cases and control individuals. It’s likely that an additional mechanism (like the polygenic mode) is involved in the genetics of sporadic SCZ. However, we still believe that deleterious de novo mutations play an important role in a proportion of SCZ patients as demonstrated by our group and others [14-16]. It is well known that SCZ is genetically heterogeneous and hundreds and probably thousands of genes are involved. Therefore, to date, very few cases with de novo mutation have been reported to be associated with the same genes. Addressing the complete genetic picture of a polygenic disease such as SCZ is still a major challenge and will require further independent replication studies to clarify the role of these genes.

Websites references

ExonPrimer: http://ihg.gsf.de/ihg/ExonPrimer.html. Primer3 Plus interface: http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LJ, SLG, PAD and GAR designed the study. LJ, SD, AA performed the experiments. MOK and RJ recruited cases and collected clinical information. LJ, JG, PAD and GAR wrote the paper. All authors have approved the final manuscript.
  14 in total

1.  Improving sequence variant descriptions in mutation databases and literature using the Mutalyzer sequence variation nomenclature checker.

Authors:  Martin Wildeman; Ernest van Ophuizen; Johan T den Dunnen; Peter E M Taschner
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  Where are the missing pieces of the schizophrenia genetics puzzle?

Authors:  Simon L Girard; Lan Xiong; Patrick A Dion; Guy A Rouleau
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  A polygenic theory of schizophrenia.

Authors:  I I Gottesman; J Shields
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Direct measure of the de novo mutation rate in autism and schizophrenia cohorts.

Authors:  Philip Awadalla; Julie Gauthier; Rachel A Myers; Ferran Casals; Fadi F Hamdan; Alexander R Griffing; Mélanie Côté; Edouard Henrion; Dan Spiegelman; Julien Tarabeux; Amélie Piton; Yan Yang; Adam Boyko; Carlos Bustamante; Lan Xiong; Judith L Rapoport; Anjené M Addington; J Lynn E DeLisi; Marie-Odile Krebs; Ridha Joober; Bruno Millet; Eric Fombonne; Laurent Mottron; Martine Zilversmit; Jon Keebler; Hussein Daoud; Claude Marineau; Marie-Hélène Roy-Gagnon; Marie-Pierre Dubé; Adam Eyre-Walker; Pierre Drapeau; Eric A Stone; Ronald G Lafrenière; Guy A Rouleau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; David Altshuler; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Richard A Gibbs; Matt E Hurles; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Schizophrenia as a complex trait: evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies.

Authors:  Patrick F Sullivan; Kenneth S Kendler; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12

7.  A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.

Authors:  Ivan A Adzhubei; Steffen Schmidt; Leonid Peshkin; Vasily E Ramensky; Anna Gerasimova; Peer Bork; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with sporadic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bin Xu; J Louw Roos; Shawn Levy; E J van Rensburg; Joseph A Gogos; Maria Karayiorgou
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  PANTHER: a browsable database of gene products organized by biological function, using curated protein family and subfamily classification.

Authors:  Paul D Thomas; Anish Kejariwal; Michael J Campbell; Huaiyu Mi; Karen Diemer; Nan Guo; Istvan Ladunga; Betty Ulitsky-Lazareva; Anushya Muruganujan; Steven Rabkin; Jody A Vandergriff; Olivier Doremieux
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  De novo gene mutations highlight patterns of genetic and neural complexity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Iuliana Ionita-Laza; J Louw Roos; Braden Boone; Scarlet Woodrick; Yan Sun; Shawn Levy; Joseph A Gogos; Maria Karayiorgou
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  8 in total

1.  Alteration of gray matter microstructure in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Johanna Seitz; Yogesh Rathi; Amanda Lyall; Ofer Pasternak; Elisabetta C Del Re; Margaret Niznikiewicz; Paul Nestor; Larry J Seidman; Tracey L Petryshen; Raquelle I Mesholam-Gately; Joanne Wojcik; Robert W McCarley; Martha E Shenton; Inga K Koerte; Marek Kubicki
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.978

Review 2.  The Role of Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cell and Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sovannarath Pong; Rakesh Karmacharya; Marianna Sofman; Jeffrey R Bishop; Paulo Lizano
Journal:  Complex Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-14

3.  A novel heterozygous missense variant of the ARID4A gene identified in Han Chinese families with schizophrenia-diagnosed siblings that interferes with DNA-binding activity.

Authors:  Decheng Ren; Xiaoxi Wei; Lin Lin; Fan Yuan; Yan Bi; Zhenming Guo; Liangjie Liu; Lei Ji; Xiao Yang; Ke Han; Fengping Yang; Xi Wu; Xingwang Li; Zhenghui Yi; Yifeng Xu; Changqun Cai; Peng Wang; Weidong Li; Lin He; Daizhan Zhou; Tao Yu; Yi Shi; Qing Lu; Guang He
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 13.437

4.  DNA methylation differences in cortical grey and white matter in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Amber Berdenis van Berlekom; Nina Notman; Marjolein Am Sneeboer; Gijsje Jlj Snijders; Lotte C Houtepen; Danny M Nispeling; Yujie He; Stella Dracheva; Elly M Hol; René S Kahn; Lot D de Witte; Marco P Boks
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Histaminergic system in brain disorders: lessons from the translational approach and future perspectives.

Authors:  Diego Baronio; Taylor Gonchoroski; Kamila Castro; Geancarlo Zanatta; Carmem Gottfried; Rudimar Riesgo
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Effects of Importin α1/KPNA1 deletion and adolescent social isolation stress on psychiatric disorder-associated behaviors in mice.

Authors:  Koki Sakurai; Taichi Itou; Makiko Morita; Emiko Kasahara; Tetsuji Moriyama; Tom Macpherson; Takaaki Ozawa; Yoichi Miyamoto; Yoshihiro Yoneda; Atsuo Sekiyama; Masahiro Oka; Takatoshi Hikida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genetic Evaluation of Schizophrenia Using the Illumina HumanExome Chip.

Authors:  Tim Moons; Marc De Hert; Edith Gellens; Leen Gielen; Kim Sweers; Sigrun Jacqmaert; Ruud van Winkel; Philippe Vandekerckhove; Stephan Claes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Biological networks in Parkinson's disease: an insight into the epigenetic mechanisms associated with this disease.

Authors:  Paulami Chatterjee; Debjani Roy; Malay Bhattacharyya; Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.