Literature DB >> 23425310

Prognostic indicators in WHO 2003 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Weiwei Feng1, Keqin Hua, Einar Gudlaugsson, Yinhua Yu, Xianrong Zhou, Jan P A Baak.   

Abstract

AIMS: Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) has traditionally been divided into low and high grade, but the World Health Organization (WHO, 2003) has changed the definition. Since 2003, many studies have used the old criteria, and few have focused on WHO 2003-defined ESS low grade (ESS-LG). The aim of this study was to investigate prognosticators in ESS-LG. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We reviewed the WHO 2003 diagnostic criteria in 91 tumours (previously classified as ESS low and high grade). There were 68 cases of ESS-LG and 23 of undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES). In the ESS-LG cases, the prognostic value of clinicopathological variables was studied. With a median follow-up of 79 months (range: 20-474 months), the recurrence and death rates were 5/68 (7%) and 1/68 (1.5%) in the ESS-LG cases. Ovarian preservation or no ovarian preservation (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 10.4) and mitotic activity index (MAI) (0-3 versus >3, P = 0.005, HR 8.6) had independent prognostic value. Other frequently used MAI thresholds - age, tumour diameter, and vessel invasion - were not prognostic. Among patients without ovarian preservation (n = 61), none of 53 with MAI 0-3 suffered recurrence, contrasting with two of eight (25%) of those with MAI >3 (P = 0.003); one of these two recurrence patients died (P = 0.02). Among patients with ovarian preservation (n = 7), three (43%) suffered recurrence but none died, and MAI had no additional prognostic value.
CONCLUSIONS: In ESS-LG, ovarian preservation and MAI >3 are associated with increased risk of recurrence.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23425310     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04115.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  7 in total

1.  Endometrial stromal sarcoma with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus: a case report.

Authors:  Guiqiu Liu; Chuanshan Zhang; Zhe Ma; Qin Zhang; Bingbing Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01

2.  Safety of ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with stage I uterine sarcoma.

Authors:  Dimitrios Nasioudis; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Melissa Frey; Kevin Holcomb
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qianwen Dai; Baolin Xu; Huanwen Wu; Yan You; Ming Wu; Lei Li
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index in Patients With Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma.

Authors:  Yu Meng; Quan Quan; Fenfen Zhang; Yao Liu; Siling Ren; Xiaoling Mu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-25

5.  Low-Grade Uterine Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Prognostic Analysis of Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Surgical Management, and Adjuvant Treatments. Experience From Two Referral Centers.

Authors:  Fulvio Borella; Luca Bertero; Paola Cassoni; Elisa Piovano; Niccolò Gallio; Mario Preti; Stefano Cosma; Domenico Ferraioli; Luca Pace; Luca Mariani; Nicoletta Biglia; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with variable morphologies in the ovaries and mesentery: A case report.

Authors:  Hai-Yun Yu; Yu-Lan Jin
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.534

7.  Can proliferation biomarkers reliably predict recurrence in World Health Organization 2003 defined endometrial stromal sarcoma, low grade?

Authors:  Weiwei Feng; Anais Malpica; Ivar Skaland; Einar Gudlaugsson; Stanley J Robboy; Ingvild Dalen; Keqin Hua; Xianrong Zhou; Jan P A Baak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.