Literature DB >> 23425201

Reconstruction of nasal defects with forehead flaps in patients older than 75 years of age.

M Kendler1, M Averbeck, T Wetzig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the number of elderly patients diagnosed with non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) increases, the number of patients receiving dermatologic surgery also increases. Multimorbidity in this patient group is common.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the aesthetic and functional outcomes and complications of forehead flap (FHF) in elderly patients with NMSC.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2011, data for 28 patients 75 years of age or older who had been treated with FHFs under tumescent local anaesthesia were analysed.
RESULTS: The median age of the study participants was 81 years (range, 75-95 years). Of the 28 total patients, 16 (57%) were female and 12 (43%) were male. The average defect size was 11 cm(2) (5-30 cm(2)). Cartilage grafts were used in four patients (14%). The average time to takedown was 25 days (17-45). The median follow-up for the patients was 10 months (1-60 months). There were seven treatment-related complications due to infectious causes (2), epidermal necrotic tissue (2), bleeding (1), hair on the flap (1) and alar rim notching (1). No life-threatening complications were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: The FHF procedure is a safe and low-risk procedure in patients 75 years of age or older with advanced skin defects. If a defect requires an FHF to obtain a normal and aesthetic appearance, this procedure should be performed. However, dermatologists must weigh the safety of the procedure in relation to the clinical benefits when managing this patient group.
© 2013 The Authors Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology © 2013 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23425201     DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  4 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of Nasolabial Flap Versus Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sourabh Shankar Chakraborty; Akhil Dhanesh Goel; Ranjit Kumar Sahu; Manojit Midya; Sudeshna Acharya; Neha Shakrawal
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Complete division of the pedicle of the forehead flap is possible after 1 week of engraftment in selected patients.

Authors:  Moritz Felcht; Tino Wetzig
Journal:  JAAD Int       Date:  2020-11-30

3.  Complex Nasal Reconstruction in a Wide-awake Ambulatory Setting: A Study of Efficacy and Perioperative Patient Experience.

Authors:  Hannah N St Denis-Katz; Michael Bastianelli; Jillian Macdonald; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-29

4.  Spectacles under Pedicles: Eyewear Modification with the Paramedian Forehead Flap.

Authors:  Linda T Qu; John P Kelpin; Mitchell G Eichhorn; Ewa Komorowska-Timek
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.