Literature DB >> 23424493

2-(Carb-oxy-meth-yl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-1-ium chloride.

Wen-Yu Yin1.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title salt, C(9)H(9)N(2)O(2) (+)·Cl(-), the cations and anions are linked into chains parallel to [021] by O-H⋯Cl and N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23424493      PMCID: PMC3569747          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812051549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the diversity of structures and the applications of compounds with an imidazole moiety, see: Catalano & Etogo (2007 ▶); Feng et al. (2012 ▶); Keppler et al. (1987 ▶); Poul et al. (2007 ▶); Saha et al. (2012 ▶); Samantaray et al. (2007 ▶); Takagaki et al. (2012 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H9N2O2 +·Cl− M = 212.63 Monoclinic, a = 5.4032 (8) Å b = 14.722 (2) Å c = 12.1055 (18) Å β = 96.182 (4)° V = 957.3 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.37 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.25 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.913, T max = 0.957 7948 measured reflections 1689 independent reflections 1417 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.044

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.047 wR(F 2) = 0.083 S = 1.02 1689 reflections 134 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL/PC and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812051549/hp2052sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812051549/hp2052Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812051549/hp2052Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H9N2O2+·ClF(000) = 440
Mr = 212.63Dx = 1.475 Mg m3Dm = 1.475 Mg m3Dm measured by not measured
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 9784 reflections
a = 5.4032 (8) Åθ = 3.2–25.0°
b = 14.722 (2) ŵ = 0.37 mm1
c = 12.1055 (18) ÅT = 293 K
β = 96.182 (4)°Block, yellow
V = 957.3 (2) Å30.25 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Mercury diffractometer1689 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1417 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.044
/w scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.913, Tmax = 0.957k = −17→17
7948 measured reflectionsl = −14→14
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.083H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0102P)2 + 1.0216P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1689 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
134 parametersΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.99075 (13)0.33311 (5)0.93211 (6)0.0507 (2)
C10.3725 (4)0.61391 (17)0.6832 (2)0.0372 (6)
C60.6807 (5)0.57805 (17)0.5799 (2)0.0396 (6)
H60.81960.55030.55560.048*
O10.7448 (4)0.72008 (14)0.26206 (16)0.0559 (6)
H10.83520.69860.21840.084*
O20.9053 (3)0.60844 (14)0.37360 (15)0.0540 (5)
N10.5729 (4)0.55760 (14)0.67658 (17)0.0363 (5)
C50.6379 (5)0.49364 (18)0.7568 (2)0.0431 (7)
H20.77470.45610.75210.052*
C40.4994 (5)0.48630 (19)0.8428 (2)0.0482 (7)
H30.54060.44280.89740.058*
C30.2926 (5)0.5438 (2)0.8513 (2)0.0496 (7)
H40.19920.53770.91100.060*
C20.2295 (5)0.60797 (19)0.7725 (2)0.0451 (7)
H50.09540.64670.77790.054*
N20.3549 (4)0.66686 (16)0.59268 (18)0.0402 (5)
C70.5447 (5)0.64601 (17)0.5281 (2)0.0374 (6)
C80.5594 (5)0.69786 (18)0.4237 (2)0.0451 (7)
H8A0.58620.76130.44280.054*
H8B0.39940.69350.37920.054*
C90.7576 (5)0.66897 (19)0.3528 (2)0.0419 (6)
H2A0.251 (6)0.714 (2)0.581 (2)0.067 (10)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0547 (4)0.0434 (4)0.0564 (4)−0.0043 (3)0.0173 (3)0.0008 (3)
C10.0329 (14)0.0375 (15)0.0410 (15)−0.0032 (11)0.0026 (12)−0.0069 (12)
C60.0347 (14)0.0426 (16)0.0429 (15)0.0031 (12)0.0099 (12)−0.0034 (12)
O10.0640 (14)0.0566 (13)0.0500 (12)0.0101 (10)0.0193 (10)0.0099 (11)
O20.0505 (12)0.0654 (14)0.0475 (11)0.0186 (11)0.0110 (10)0.0049 (10)
N10.0337 (11)0.0358 (12)0.0393 (12)−0.0016 (10)0.0035 (10)−0.0030 (10)
C50.0395 (15)0.0441 (16)0.0448 (16)0.0022 (12)0.0002 (13)0.0016 (13)
C40.0530 (18)0.0477 (17)0.0430 (16)−0.0026 (14)0.0010 (14)0.0028 (13)
C30.0514 (17)0.0566 (19)0.0422 (16)−0.0097 (15)0.0113 (14)−0.0047 (14)
C20.0400 (15)0.0484 (17)0.0484 (16)0.0007 (13)0.0115 (13)−0.0100 (14)
N20.0363 (12)0.0401 (13)0.0446 (13)0.0055 (11)0.0066 (10)−0.0019 (11)
C70.0346 (13)0.0371 (15)0.0408 (14)−0.0023 (11)0.0064 (12)−0.0061 (12)
C80.0454 (16)0.0442 (16)0.0459 (16)0.0053 (13)0.0064 (13)0.0007 (13)
C90.0410 (15)0.0432 (16)0.0412 (15)−0.0040 (13)0.0033 (12)−0.0036 (13)
C1—N21.340 (3)C4—C31.414 (4)
C1—N11.373 (3)C4—H30.9300
C1—C21.398 (4)C3—C21.359 (4)
C6—C71.354 (3)C3—H40.9300
C6—N11.395 (3)C2—H50.9300
C6—H60.9300N2—C71.389 (3)
O1—C91.327 (3)N2—H2A0.89 (3)
O1—H10.8200C7—C81.487 (4)
O2—C91.205 (3)C8—C91.503 (4)
N1—C51.371 (3)C8—H8A0.9700
C5—C41.351 (4)C8—H8B0.9700
C5—H20.9300
N2—C1—N1106.9 (2)C3—C2—C1117.9 (3)
N2—C1—C2132.3 (2)C3—C2—H5121.0
N1—C1—C2120.8 (2)C1—C2—H5121.0
C7—C6—N1107.0 (2)C1—N2—C7109.9 (2)
C7—C6—H6126.5C1—N2—H2A124 (2)
N1—C6—H6126.5C7—N2—H2A125 (2)
C9—O1—H1109.5C6—C7—N2107.4 (2)
C5—N1—C1121.1 (2)C6—C7—C8134.2 (2)
C5—N1—C6130.1 (2)N2—C7—C8118.4 (2)
C1—N1—C6108.8 (2)C7—C8—C9116.5 (2)
C4—C5—N1118.7 (3)C7—C8—H8A108.2
C4—C5—H2120.7C9—C8—H8A108.2
N1—C5—H2120.7C7—C8—H8B108.2
C5—C4—C3121.0 (3)C9—C8—H8B108.2
C5—C4—H3119.5H8A—C8—H8B107.3
C3—C4—H3119.5O2—C9—O1124.5 (2)
C2—C3—C4120.4 (3)O2—C9—C8125.9 (3)
C2—C3—H4119.8O1—C9—C8109.6 (2)
C4—C3—H4119.8
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···Cl1i0.822.192.984 (2)163
N2—H2A···Cl1ii0.89 (3)2.18 (3)3.074 (2)175 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯Cl1i 0.822.192.984 (2)163
N2—H2A⋯Cl1ii 0.89 (3)2.18 (3)3.074 (2)175 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Structural characterization and spectroelectrochemical, anion sensing and solvent dependence photophysical studies of a bimetallic Ru(II) complex derived from 1,3-di(1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline-2-yl)benzene.

Authors:  Debasish Saha; Shyamal Das; Sourav Mardanya; Sujoy Baitalik
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  Monocopper center embedded in a biomimetic cavity: from supramolecular control of copper coordination to redox regulation.

Authors:  Nicolas Le Poul; Morgan Campion; Bénédicte Douziech; Yannick Rondelez; Loïc Le Clainche; Olivia Reinaud; Yves Le Mest
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Synthesis of pyrrole-imidazole polyamide seco-1-chloromethyl-5-hydroxy-1,2-dihydro-3h-benz[e]indole conjugates with a vinyl linker recognizing a 7 bp DNA sequence.

Authors:  Toshiki Takagaki; Toshikazu Bando; Hiroshi Sugiyama
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Preparation of Au(I), Ag(I), and Pd(II) N-heterocyclic carbene complexes utilizing a methylpyridyl-substituted NHC ligand. formation of a luminescent coordination polymer.

Authors:  Vincent J Catalano; Anthony O Etogo
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.