Literature DB >> 23424144

Statistical epistasis networks reduce the computational complexity of searching three-locus genetic models.

Ting Hu1, Angeline S Andrew, Margaret R Karagas, Jason H Moore.   

Abstract

The rapid development of sequencing technologies makes thousands to millions of genetic attributes available for testing associations with various biological traits. Searching this enormous high-dimensional data space imposes a great computational challenge in genome-wide association studies. We introduce a network-based approach to supervise the search for three-locus models of disease susceptibility. Such statistical epistasis networks (SEN) are built using strong pairwise epistatic interactions and provide a global interaction map to search for higher-order interactions by prioritizing genetic attributes clustered together in the networks. Applying this approach to a population-based bladder cancer dataset, we found a high susceptibility three-way model of genetic variations in DNA repair and immune regulation pathways, which holds great potential for studying the etiology of bladder cancer with further biological validations. We demonstrate that our SEN-supervised search is able to find a small subset of three-locus models with significantly high associations at a substantially reduced computational cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23424144      PMCID: PMC3587773     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput        ISSN: 2335-6928


  31 in total

1.  A perspective on epistasis: limits of models displaying no main effect.

Authors:  Robert Culverhouse; Brian K Suarez; Jennifer Lin; Theodore Reich
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Lance W Hahn; Marylyn D Ritchie; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Marylyn D Ritchie; Lance W Hahn; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 4.  Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  STUDENTJAMA. The challenges of whole-genome approaches to common diseases.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases.

Authors:  Jason H Moore
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  Interleukin-1 polymorphisms associated with increased risk of gastric cancer.

Authors:  E M El-Omar; M Carrington; W H Chow; K E McColl; J H Bream; H A Young; J Herrera; J Lissowska; C C Yuan; N Rothman; G Lanyon; M Martin; J F Fraumeni; C S Rabkin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies?

Authors:  Orjan Carlborg; Chris S Haley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  IMP: a multi-species functional genomics portal for integration, visualization and prediction of protein functions and networks.

Authors:  Aaron K Wong; Christopher Y Park; Casey S Greene; Lars A Bongo; Yuanfang Guan; Olga G Troyanskaya
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Design of an epidemiologic study of drinking water arsenic exposure and skin and bladder cancer risk in a U.S. population.

Authors:  M R Karagas; T D Tosteson; J Blum; J S Morris; J A Baron; B Klaue
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  EpistasisRank and EpistasisKatz: interaction network centrality methods that integrate prior knowledge networks.

Authors:  Saeid Parvandeh; Brett A McKinney
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Practical aspects of genome-wide association interaction analysis.

Authors:  Elena S Gusareva; Kristel Van Steen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Heuristic identification of biological architectures for simulating complex hierarchical genetic interactions.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Ryan Amos; Jeff Kiralis; Peter C Andrews
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Functional dyadicity and heterophilicity of gene-gene interactions in statistical epistasis networks.

Authors:  Ting Hu; Angeline S Andrew; Margaret R Karagas; Jason H Moore
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.522

5.  Integrative information theoretic network analysis for genome-wide association study of aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease in Korean population.

Authors:  Sehee Wang; Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Dokyoon Kim; Kyubum Wee; Hae-Sim Park; Seung-Hyun Kim; Kyung-Ah Sohn
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 6.  How to increase our belief in discovered statistical interactions via large-scale association studies?

Authors:  K Van Steen; J H Moore
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  The post GWAS era: strategies to identify gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  Silvia Selinski
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.068

8.  CINOEDV: a co-information based method for detecting and visualizing n-order epistatic interactions.

Authors:  Junliang Shang; Yingxia Sun; Jin-Xing Liu; Junfeng Xia; Junying Zhang; Chun-Hou Zheng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.