Literature DB >> 23423916

A systematic review of risk prediction in adult cardiac surgery: considerations for future model development.

Stuart J Head1, Ruben L J Osnabrugge, Neil J Howell, Nick Freemantle, Ben Bridgewater, Domenico Pagano, A Pieter Kappetein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Risk prediction in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains inaccurate and should be further improved. Therefore, we aimed to identify risk factors that are predictive of mortality, stroke, renal failure and/or length of stay after adult cardiac surgery in contemporary practice.
METHODS: We searched the Medline database for English-language original contributions from January 2000 to December 2011 to identify preoperative independent risk factors of one of the following outcomes after adult cardiac surgery: death, stroke, renal failure and/or length of stay. Two investigators independently screened the studies. Inclusion criteria were (i) the study described an adult cardiac patient population; (ii) the study was an original contribution; (iii) multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors; (iv) ≥ 1 of the predefined outcomes was analysed; (v) at least one variable was an independent predictor, or a variable was included in a risk model that was developed.
RESULTS: The search yielded 5768 studies. After the initial title screening, a second screening of the full texts of 1234 studies was performed. Ultimately, 844 studies were included in the systematic review. In these studies, we identified a large number of independent predictors of mortality, stroke, renal failure and length of stay, which could be categorized into variables related to: disease pathology, planned surgical procedure, patient demographics, patient history, patient comorbidities, patient status, blood values, urine values, medication use and gene mutations. Many of these variables are frequently not considered as predictive of outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk estimates of mortality, stroke, renal failure and length of stay may be improved by the inclusion of additional (non-traditional) innovative risk factors. Current and future databases should consider collecting these variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23423916     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  14 in total

1.  Continuous evolution of risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention.

Authors:  Hoda Javadikasgari; A Marc Gillinov
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Genetic fuzzy system for mortality risk assessment in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Hoda Javadikasgari; Alireza Alizadeh Ghavidel; Maziar Gholampour
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Editorial considerations on the new clinical and surgical perspectives of Brazilian cardiology.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto B Evora; Alfredo J Rodrigues
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 4.  Systemic hemodynamics in advanced cirrhosis: Concerns during perioperative period of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Yasuhiro Ogura; Yasuharu Onishi; Hideya Kamei; Nobuhiko Kurata; Motoshi Kainuma; Hideo Takahashi; Shogo Suzuki; Takashi Ichikawa; Shoko Mizuno; Tadashi Aoyama; Yuki Ishida; Takahiro Hirai; Tomoko Hayashi; Kazuko Hasegawa; Hiromu Takeichi; Atsunobu Ota; Yasuhiro Kodera; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Taku Iida; Shintaro Yagi; Kentaro Taniguchi; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-08

Review 5.  Cardiac surgery as a stressor and the response of the vulnerable older adult.

Authors:  Iva Neupane; Rakesh C Arora; James L Rudolph
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.032

Review 6.  Cardiac surgical patients are not the same. But who knows that: the patient, the cardiologist or the surgeon?

Authors:  Haralabos Parissis; Bassel Al-Alao
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-29

7.  Risk factors of postcardiotomy ventricular dysfunction in moderate-to-high risk patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

Authors:  Christoph Ellenberger; Tornike Sologashvili; Mustafa Cikirikcioglu; Gabriel Verdon; John Diaper; Tiziano Cassina; Marc Licker
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  How Accurate Are the Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS) Universal Calculators in Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Amber W Trickey; Qian Ding; Alex H S Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Influence of deep sternal wound infection on long-term survival after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Sebastian Colombier; Ulf Kessler; Enrico Ferrari; Ludwig K von Segesser; Denis A Berdajs
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-08-14

10.  Surgeon length of service and risk-adjusted outcomes: linked observational analysis of the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit Registry and General Medical Council Register.

Authors:  Graeme L Hickey; Stuart W Grant; Nick Freemantle; David Cunningham; Christopher M Munsch; Steven A Livesey; James Roxburgh; Iain Buchan; Ben Bridgewater
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.