Literature DB >> 23422803

Evaluation of a novel cryoablation system: in vivo testing in a chronic porcine model.

Timo Weimar1, Anson M Lee, Shuddhadeb Ray, Richard B Schuessler, Ralph J Damiano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cryoablation is commonly used at present in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there have been few studies examining the efficacy of the commonly used ablation devices. This report compares the efficacy of two cryoprobes in creating transmural endocardial lesions on the beating heart in a porcine model for chronic AF.
METHODS: In six Hanford miniature swine, the right atrial appendage and the inferior vena cava were isolated using a bipolar radiofrequency clamp to create areas of known conduction block. A connecting ablation line was performed endocardially via a purse string with the novel malleable 10-cm Cryo1 probe for 2 minutes at -40°C. Additional ablation lines were created with the Cryo1 and the 3.5-cm 3011 Maze Linear probe on the right and the left atrial wall. Epicardial activation mapping was performed before and immediately after ablation as well as 14 days postoperatively. Histologic examination was performed 14 days postoperatively.
RESULTS: Transmural lesions were confirmed in 83/84 cross-sections (99%) for the Cryo1 probe and in 40/41 cross-sections (98%) for the 3011 Maze Linear probe. There was no difference between the devices in lesion width (mean ± SD, Cryo1, 10.7 ± 3.5 mm; 3011, 10.0 ± 3.9 mm; P = 0.31), lesion depth (Cryo1, 4.5 ± 1.7 mm; 3011, 4.6 ± 1.5 mm; P = 0.74), or atrial wall thickness (Cryo1, 4.5 ± 1.8 mm; 3011, 4.7 ± 1.7 mm; P = 0.74). There was a conduction delay across the right atrial ablation line (20 ± 2 milliseconds vs 51 ± 8 milliseconds, P < 0.001) that remained unchanged at 14 days (51 ± 8 milliseconds vs 52 ± 10 milliseconds, P = 0.88).
CONCLUSIONS: The Cryo1 probe created transmural lesions on the beating heart, resulting in sustained conduction delay. Both probes had a similar performance in lesion geometry in this chronic animal model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23422803      PMCID: PMC3578219          DOI: 10.1177/155698451200700607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innovations (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-9845


  21 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the maze III procedure: are modifications necessary?

Authors:  J M Arcidi; R C Millar
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Alternative energy sources for surgical atrial ablation.

Authors:  Mathew R Williams; Mauricio Garrido; Mehmet C Oz; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.620

3.  Chronic performance of a novel radiofrequency ablation device on the beating heart: Limitations of conduction delay to assess transmurality.

Authors:  Anson M Lee; Abdulhameed Aziz; Kal L Clark; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Alternative energy sources for the ablation of arrhythmias.

Authors:  Jennifer E Cummings; Antonio Pacifico; John L Drago; Fethi Kilicaslan; Andrea Natale
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 5.  Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery.

Authors:  A A Gage; J Baust
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation for the elimination of chronic atrial fibrillation in cardiac valvular surgery.

Authors:  T Sueda; K Imai; O Ishii; K Orihashi; M Watari; K Okada
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  En bloc exclusion of the pulmonary vein region in the pig using off pump, beating, intra-cardiac surgery: a pilot study of minimally invasive surgery for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gerard M Guiraudon; Douglas L Jones; Allan C Skanes; Daniel Bainbridge; Colette M Guiraudon; Steen M Jensen; Xiaping Yuan; Maria Drangova; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation; a systematic review.

Authors:  Krishna Khargi; Barbara A Hutten; Bernd Lemke; Thomas Deneke
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Epicardial treatment of atrial fibrillation using cryoablation in an acute off-pump sheep model.

Authors:  N Doll; P Kornherr; H Aupperle; A M Fabricius; B Kiaii; C Ullmann; K Schneider; S Dhein; H-A Schoon; A Rastan; T Walther; F W Mohr
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  Surgical ablation devices for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Shelly C Lall; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.900

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Novel Cryoprobe for Atrial Ablation in a Chronic Ovine Model.

Authors:  Matthew R Schill; Spencer J Melby; Molly Speltz; May Breitbach; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  The surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation: ablation technology and surgical approaches.

Authors:  Linda Henry; Niv Ad
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2013-07-25

3.  Validation of a low-cost, carbon dioxide-based cryoablation system for percutaneous tumor ablation.

Authors:  Bailey Surtees; Sean Young; Yixin Hu; Guannan Wang; Evelyn McChesney; Grace Kuroki; Pascal Acree; Serena Thomas; Tara Blair; Shivam Rastogi; Dara L Kraitchman; Clifford Weiss; Saraswati Sukumar; Susan C Harvey; Nicholas J Durr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Electroporation safety factor of 300 nanosecond and 10 millisecond defibrillation in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Johanna U Neuber; Andrei G Pakhomov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative analysis of ECG records depending on body position in domestic swine (Sus scrofa domestica).

Authors:  Marta Kawicka; Maksymilian Lewicki; Piotr Frydrychowski; Marcin Michałek; Agnieszka Noszczyk-Nowak
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-09-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.