Literature DB >> 23422320

Actual vs perceived performance debriefing in surgery: practice far from perfect.

Maria Ahmed1, Nick Sevdalis, Charles Vincent, Sonal Arora.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Performance feedback or debriefing in surgery is increasingly recognized as an essential means to optimize learning in the operating room (OR). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the current practice and barriers to debriefing in the OR.
METHODS: Phase 1 consisted of semistructured interviews with surgical trainers and trainees to identify features of an effective debriefing and perceived barriers to debriefing. Phase 2 consisted of ethnographic observations of surgical cases to identify current practice and observed barriers to debriefing.
RESULTS: Surgical trainers and trainees identified key features of effective debriefing with regard to the approach and content; however, these were not commonly identified in practice. Culture was recognized as a significant barrier to debriefing across both phases of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a disparity between what the surgical community views as effective debriefing and actual debriefing practices in the OR. Improvements to the current debriefing culture and practice within the field of surgery should be considered to facilitate learning from clinical practice.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23422320     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  A study to explore specific stressors and coping strategies in primary dental care practice.

Authors:  R Bretherton; H R Chapman; S Chipchase
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation.

Authors:  Louise Hull; Stephanie Russ; Maria Ahmed; Nick Sevdalis; David J Birnbach
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Growth, Engagement, and Belonging in the Clinical Learning Environment: the Role of Psychological Safety and the Work Ahead.

Authors:  Adelaide H McClintock; Tyra Fainstad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

4.  Leadership-Specific Feedback Practices in Surgical Residency: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Calista M Harbaugh; Ana C De Roo; Ben E Biesterveld; Paul G Gauger; Justin B Dimick; Gurjit Sandhu
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Learning from safety incidents in high-reliability organizations: a systematic review of learning tools that could be adapted and used in healthcare.

Authors:  Naresh Serou; Lauren M Sahota; Andy K Husband; Simon P Forrest; Robert D Slight; Sarah P Slight
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.038

6.  Comprehensive feedback on trainee surgeons' non-technical skills.

Authors:  Lene Spanager; Peter Dieckmann; Randi Beier-Holgersen; Jacob Rosenberg; Doris Oestergaard
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-01-20

7.  Exploring the nature and focus of feedback when using video playback in gynecology laparoscopy training.

Authors:  Jena M Hall; Jamie S Pyper
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-12-29

8.  Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams.

Authors:  Andrew Coggins; Sun Song Hong; Kaushik Baliga; Louis P Halamek
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.