Literature DB >> 2342177

Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection.

T A Stamey1, A A Villers, J E McNeal, P C Link, F S Freiha.   

Abstract

Positive margins were analyzed in 189 clinical stage B radical retropubic prostatectomies. Margins were identified by serially blocking the entire specimens in planes selected for optimum demonstration of capsule surface. Positive margins were divided into 2 categories: 1) those associated with capsular penetration of cancer and 2) those caused by inadvertent surgical incisions through the capsule into intracapsular cancer. Data were analyzed separately at each of 6 anatomical sites. Frequency of positive margins was related to the volume of cancer. Cancer of greater than 12 cc constituted a distinctive category in which seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node metastases and multiple positive margins were found in the majority of cases, signifying minimal possibility of cure. However, 31 positive margins occurred among 136 patients (23%) who were potentially curable by the criteria of normal seminal vesicles and absence of pelvic lymph node metastases; 17, of these 31 surgically positive margins (55%) occurred at the apex. Positive capsular penetration margins at the apex were volume-related, while negative margins were not. Site specific recommendations for avoiding positive and negative capsular penetration margins are suggested. The prostate apex, rectal and lateral surfaces, bladder neck and superior pedicles accounted for 48, 24, 16 and 10% of all positive margins, respectively. Dissection of the apical prostate and Denonvilliers' fascia require modifications of current surgical techniques if positive margins are to be avoided. Serum levels of prostate specific antigen may require as long as 5 years to become detectable when only 1 positive margin is the only evidence of nonorgan-confined disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2342177     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40216-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Modified method of radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostatic cancer.

Authors:  H Ito; K Yamaguchi; T Kotake; F Suzuki; N Miura
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Anastasiou; Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Adamakis; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Antonios Balangas; Anastasios Kollias; Kitty Pavlakis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Value of frozen section biopsies during radical prostatectomy: significance of the histological results.

Authors:  Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Robert Rabenalt; Sunjay Jain; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos; Roman Ganzer; Lars-Christian Horn; Martin Burchardt; Fernando Jiménez-Cruz; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 3. Secondary prevention of prostate cancer. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Evaluating radical prostatectomy specimens: therapeutic and prognostic importance.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  Localized prostate cancer: early intervention or expectant therapy?

Authors:  T R Griffiths; D E Neal
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated With Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology.

Authors:  Nelly Tan; Daniel J Margolis; David Y Lu; Kevin G King; Jiaoti Huang; Robert E Reiter; Steven S Raman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Influence of preoperative vesicle biopsy on the decision for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C H Deliveliotis; J Varkarakis; N Trakas; G Louras; S Giannakopoulos; A Skolarikos; E Alargof
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Target volume definition for post prostatectomy radiotherapy: Do the consensus guidelines correctly define the inferior border of the CTV?

Authors:  Mo Manji; Juanita Crook; Matt Schmid; Rasika Rajapakshe
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-09-01

10.  Impact of capsular incision on biochemical recurrence after radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  K W Kwak; H M Lee; H Y Choi
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.