Literature DB >> 23421345

Multiple perspectives on shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare.

Wei Wen Chong1, Parisa Aslani, Timothy F Chen.   

Abstract

Shared decision-making is an essential element of patient-centered care in mental health. Since mental health services involve healthcare providers from different professions, a multiple perspective to shared decision-making may be valuable. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of different healthcare professionals on shared decision-making and current interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 healthcare providers from a range of professions, which included medical practitioners (psychiatrists, general practitioners), pharmacists, nurses, occupational therapists, psychologists and social workers. Findings indicated that healthcare providers supported the notion of shared decision-making in mental health, but felt that it should be condition dependent. Medical practitioners advocated a more active participation from consumers in treatment decision-making; whereas other providers (e.g. pharmacists, occupational therapists) focused more toward acknowledging consumers' needs in decisions, perceiving themselves to be in an advisory role in supporting consumers' decision-making. Although healthcare providers acknowledged the importance of interprofessional collaboration, only a minority discussed it within the context of shared decision-making. In conclusion, healthcare providers appeared to have differing perceptions on the level of consumer involvement in shared decision-making. Interprofessional roles to facilitate shared decision-making in mental health need to be acknowledged, understood and strengthened, before an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making in mental health can be effectively implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23421345     DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2013.767225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  13 in total

1.  The clinical impact of pharmacist services on mental health collaborative teams: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brandy Davis; Jingjing Qian; Surachat Ngorsuraches; Ruth Jeminiwa; Kimberly B Garza
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2020-06-27

Review 2.  Qualitative meta-synthesis of barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of community pharmacy services: perspectives of patients, nurses and general medical practitioners.

Authors:  Lutfun N Hossain; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Tim Luckett; Joanna C Moullin; Desire Durks; Lucia Franco-Trigo; Shalom I Benrimoj; Daniel Sabater-Hernández
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Labouring Together: collaborative alliances in maternity care in Victoria, Australia-protocol of a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Vanessa Watkins; Cate Nagle; Bridie Kent; Alison M Hutchinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis.

Authors:  Frances Bunn; Claire Goodman; Bridget Russell; Patricia Wilson; Jill Manthorpe; Greta Rait; Isabel Hodkinson; Marie-Anne Durand
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  User participation and shared decision-making in adolescent mental healthcare: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Stig Bjønness; Petter Viksveen; Jan Olav Johannessen; Marianne Storm
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Adherence to antidepressant medications: an evaluation of community pharmacists' counseling practices.

Authors:  Wei Wen Chong; Parisa Aslani; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Interprofessional collaboration in the mental health services in norway.

Authors:  Ellen Andvig; Jonn Syse; Elisabeth Severinsson
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2014-03-02

8.  The Evolution of an Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Research Program: Reflective Case Study of an Emerging Paradigm.

Authors:  Maman Joyce Dogba; Matthew Menear; Dawn Stacey; Nathalie Brière; France Légaré
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.120

9.  Discrepancy in Ratings of Shared Decision Making Between Patients and Health Professionals: A Cross Sectional Study in Mental Health Care.

Authors:  Karin Drivenes; Vegard Ø Haaland; Yina L Hauge; John-Kåre Vederhus; Audun C Irgens; Kristin Klemmetsby Solli; Hilde Regevik; Ragnhild S Falk; Lars Tanum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-24

Review 10.  Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis.

Authors:  Yumi Aoki
Journal:  Jpn J Nurs Sci       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 1.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.