OBJECTIVES: To determine whether nutritional intake and medical devices are bisphenol A (BPA) exposure sources among premature infants in the NICU. METHODS: Mothers and their premature infants cared for in the NICU for the past 3 days were recruited for this exposure assessment study. Forty-three mothers contributed 1 nutrition sample (breast milk or formula) to characterize the infant's intake. Two urine samples (before and after feeding) were collected from each of 55 infants. Medical device use was categorized as "low" or "high" based on the number and invasiveness of devices used. BPA urinary concentrations used as a biomarker to estimate BPA exposure were measured by online solid-phase extraction, high performance liquid chromatography, isotope dilution, tandem mass spectrometry. Nonparametric equivalence tests, intraclass correlations, and hierarchical linear mixed-effects models were conducted. RESULTS: Breast milk and formula samples did not differ in total BPA concentration nor did infants' median urinary concentration of total BPA before or after feedings. However, the median urinary total BPA concentration among infants who required the use of 4 or more medical devices in the past 3 days was significantly higher (36.6 µg/L) than among infants who required the use of 0 to 3 devices (13.9 µg/L). The calculated BPA exposures are lower than the US Environmental Protection Agency reference dose, but considerably higher (16- to 32-fold) than among infants or children from the general population. CONCLUSIONS: The number of medical devices used in the past 3 days, but not nutritional intake, was positively associated with exposure to BPA.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether nutritional intake and medical devices are bisphenol A (BPA) exposure sources among premature infants in the NICU. METHODS: Mothers and their premature infants cared for in the NICU for the past 3 days were recruited for this exposure assessment study. Forty-three mothers contributed 1 nutrition sample (breast milk or formula) to characterize the infant's intake. Two urine samples (before and after feeding) were collected from each of 55 infants. Medical device use was categorized as "low" or "high" based on the number and invasiveness of devices used. BPA urinary concentrations used as a biomarker to estimate BPA exposure were measured by online solid-phase extraction, high performance liquid chromatography, isotope dilution, tandem mass spectrometry. Nonparametric equivalence tests, intraclass correlations, and hierarchical linear mixed-effects models were conducted. RESULTS:Breast milk and formula samples did not differ in total BPA concentration nor did infants' median urinary concentration of total BPA before or after feedings. However, the median urinary total BPA concentration among infants who required the use of 4 or more medical devices in the past 3 days was significantly higher (36.6 µg/L) than among infants who required the use of 0 to 3 devices (13.9 µg/L). The calculated BPA exposures are lower than the US Environmental Protection Agency reference dose, but considerably higher (16- to 32-fold) than among infants or children from the general population. CONCLUSIONS: The number of medical devices used in the past 3 days, but not nutritional intake, was positively associated with exposure to BPA.
Authors: Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Wolfgang Völkel; Thomas Colnot; György A Csanády; Johannes G Filser; Wolfgang Dekant Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Susan M Duty; Manori J Silva; Dana B Barr; John W Brock; Louise Ryan; Zuying Chen; Robert F Herrick; David C Christiani; Russ Hauser Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Lee-Yang Wong; John A Reidy; Larry L Needham Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Rebecca M Nachman; Stephen D Fox; W Christopher Golden; Erica Sibinga; John D Groopman; Peter S J Lees Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Vitaly Volberg; Kim Harley; Antonia M Calafat; Veronica Davé; Jessica McFadden; Brenda Eskenazi; Nina Holland Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: Krista L Y Christensen; Matthew Lorber; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Frederick S Vom Saal; Catherine A VandeVoort; Julia A Taylor; Wade V Welshons; Pierre-Louis Toutain; Patricia A Hunt Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 3.143