Literature DB >> 23420839

Antimicrobial activity of LFF571 and three treatment agents against Clostridium difficile isolates collected for a pan-European survey in 2008: clinical and therapeutic implications.

Sylvia B Debast1, Martijn P Bauer, Ingrid M J G Sanders, Mark H Wilcox, Ed J Kuijper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In November 2008, a study was performed with support from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) to obtain an overview of Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) in European hospitals. A collection of 398 C. difficile isolates obtained from this hospital-based survey was utilized to identify antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of common C. difficile PCR ribotypes across Europe.
METHODS: The MICs of three approved therapeutic agents (vancomycin, metronidazole and fidaxomicin) and LFF571 (a novel semi-synthetic thiopeptide antibiotic) were determined by the agar dilution method.
RESULTS: MICs of fidaxomicin and LFF571 were in general 2-4-fold lower than those of vancomycin and metronidazole. Isolates belonging to clade 2, including the hypervirulent ribotype 027, had one-dilution higher MIC50 and MIC90 values for fidaxomicin and metronidazole, whereas similar MIC values were observed for vancomycin and LFF571. Isolates belonging to C. difficile PCR ribotype 001 were more susceptible to fidaxomicin than other frequently found PCR ribotypes 014/020 and 078. Six isolates from three different countries had a metronidazole MIC of 2 mg/L. Four of the six isolates were characterized as PCR ribotype 001.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of in vitro resistance of C. difficile to any of the four agents tested. However, the results suggest type-specific differences in susceptibility for the treatment agents we investigated. Continuous surveillance of C. difficile isolates in Europe is needed to determine the possible clinical implications of ribotype-specific changes in susceptibility to therapeutic agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MICs; fidaxomicin; metronidazole; vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23420839     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  13 in total

1.  [Clostridium difficile infection : What is currently available for treatment?]

Authors:  A Stallmach
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Molecular typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing to six antimicrobials of Clostridium difficile isolates from three Czech hospitals in Eastern Bohemia in 2011-2012.

Authors:  V Beran; E J Kuijper; C Harmanus; I M Sanders; S M van Dorp; C W Knetsch; J Janeckova; A Seidelova; L Barekova; J Tvrdik; D Chmelar; I Ciznar
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: recent trial results.

Authors:  Sarah S Lewis; Deverick J Anderson
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2013

4.  Multicenter, randomized clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of LFF571 and vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullane; Christine Lee; Adam Bressler; Martha Buitrago; Karl Weiss; Kristina Dabovic; Jens Praestgaard; Jennifer A Leeds; Johanne Blais; Peter Pertel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacokinetics of LFF571 and vancomycin in patients with moderate Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Suraj G Bhansali; Kathleen Mullane; Lillian S L Ting; Jennifer A Leeds; Kristina Dabovic; Jens Praestgaard; Peter Pertel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Novel riboswitch-binding flavin analog that protects mice against Clostridium difficile infection without inhibiting cecal flora.

Authors:  Kenneth F Blount; Cynthia Megyola; Mark Plummer; David Osterman; Tim O'Connell; Paul Aristoff; Cheryl Quinn; R Alan Chrusciel; Toni J Poel; Heinrich J Schostarez; Catherine A Stewart; Daniel P Walker; Peter G M Wuts; Ronald R Breaker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Genome Location Dictates the Transcriptional Response to PolC Inhibition in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Erika van Eijk; Ilse M Boekhoud; Ed J Kuijper; Ingrid M J G Bos-Sanders; George Wright; Wiep Klaas Smits
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antibacterials Developed to Target a Single Organism: Mechanisms and Frequencies of Reduced Susceptibility to the Novel Anti-Clostridium difficile Compounds Fidaxomicin and LFF571.

Authors:  Jennifer A Leeds
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 9.  YcaO-Dependent Posttranslational Amide Activation: Biosynthesis, Structure, and Function.

Authors:  Brandon J Burkhart; Christopher J Schwalen; Greg Mann; James H Naismith; Douglas A Mitchell
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Characterization of Clostridium difficile Strains in British Columbia, Canada: A Shift from NAP1 Majority (2008) to Novel Strain Types (2013) in One Region.

Authors:  Agatha N Jassem; Natalie Prystajecky; Fawziah Marra; Pamela Kibsey; Kennard Tan; Patricia Umlandt; Loretta Janz; Sylvie Champagne; Bruce Gamage; George R Golding; Michael R Mulvey; Bonnie Henry; Linda M N Hoang
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.