Literature DB >> 23420313

[Detection of prostate cancer by real-time MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: 3T MRI and state of the art sonography].

T Durmus1, C Stephan, M Grigoryev, G Diederichs, M Saleh, T Slowinski, A Maxeiner, A Thomas, T Fischer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multiparametric MRI of the prostate is a noninvasive diagnostic method with high sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether prostate cancer detection rates of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy may be improved by an image fusion of state-of-the-art ultrasound (CEUS, elastography) and MR (T2w, DWI) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 consecutive patients with a history of elevated PSA levels and at least one negative TRUS-guided biopsy with clinical indication for a systematic re-biopsy underwent multiparametric 3 T MRI without endorectal coil. MR data (T2w) were uploaded to a modern sonography system and image fusion was performed in real-time mode during biopsy. B-mode, Doppler, elastography and CEUS imaging were applied to characterize suspicious lesions detected by MRI. Targeted biopsies were performed in MR/US fusion mode followed by a systematic standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Detection rates for both methods were calculated and compared using the Chi²-test.
RESULTS: Patient age was not significantly different in patients with and without histologically confirmed prostate cancer (65.2 ± 8.0 and 64.1 ± 7.3 age [p = 0.93]). The PSA value was significantly higher in patients with prostate cancer (15.5 ± 9.3 ng/ml) compared to patients without cancer (PSA 10.4 ± 9.6 ng/ml; p = 0.02). The proportion of histologically confirmed cancers in the study group (n = 32) of the MR/US fusion biopsy (11/12; 34.4 %) was significantly higher (p = 0.01) in comparison to the TRUS systematic biopsy (6/12; 18.8 %).
CONCLUSION: Real-time MR/US image fusion may enhance cancer detection rates of TRUS-guided biopsies and should therefore be studied in further larger studies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23420313     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1330704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in imaging-guided interventions for prostate cancers.

Authors:  Xia Wu; Feng Zhang; Ran Chen; Weiliang Zheng; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  [Reply to: PSA screening : Possible uses and harm by N. Keller, M. Jenny, G. Gigerenzer, R. Ablin].

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Thorsten Schlomm; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.

Authors:  Hannes Cash; Andreas Maxeiner; Carsten Stephan; Thomas Fischer; Tahir Durmus; Josephine Holzmann; Patrick Asbach; Matthias Haas; Stefan Hinz; Jörg Neymeyer; Kurt Miller; Karsten Günzel; Carsten Kempkensteffen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Omission of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy from the MRI targeted approach in men with previous negative prostate biopsy might still be premature.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

5.  A direct comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and prediction of aggressiveness.

Authors:  Alexander D J Baur; Julia Schwabe; Julian Rogasch; Andreas Maxeiner; Tobias Penzkofer; Carsten Stephan; Marc Rudl; Bernd Hamm; Ernst-Michael Jung; Thom Fischer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Multiparametric MRI of the prostate with three functional techniques in patients with PSA elevation before initial TRUS-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Elke Hauth; Horst Hohmuth; Corina Cozub-Poetica; Stefan Bernand; Meinrad Beer; Horst Jaeger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Endorectal fusion imaging: A description of a new technique.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Yi Dong; Gudrun Schuessler; Ulrich Baum; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.