| Literature DB >> 23420158 |
Rodrigo Melo Gallindo1, Frances Lilian Lanhellas Gonçalves, Carolina Teixeira de Resende Barreto, Augusto Frederico Santos Schmidt, Luis Antonio Violin Dias Pereira, Lourenço Sbragia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the histological changes of tracheal cartilage and epithelium caused by tracheal occlusion at different gestational ages in a fetal rat model.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23420158 PMCID: PMC3552446 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2013(01)oa09
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1TO procedure in a rat fetus: A) exposition of the cephalic pole after opening the uterine cavity; B) after cervical incision, the titanium clip is affixed on the trachea in a way that occludes the organ without cutting it.
Figure 2Morphological results: BW: Body weight (A), TLW: Total lung weight (B) and TLW/BW ratio (C).
Morphometrical results in the different groups, expressed as the means and SD.
| GD | EC | C | S | TO | p-value | |
| BW (g) | 19.5 | 4.027 (±0.301) | 2.693 (±0.169) | 2.617 (±0.170) | 2.793 (±0.245) | p<0.001 A,B,C |
| 20.5 | 5.403 (±0.401) | 4.017 (±0.286) | 3.996 (±0.380) | 4.001 (±0.477) | p<0.001 A,B,C | |
| 21.5 | 5.769 (±0.322) | 4.881 (±0.444) | 4.908 (±0.163) | 5.630 (±0.799) | p<0.05 E,F p<0.001 A,B | |
| TLW (g) | 19.5 | 0.134 (±0.013) | 0.076 (±0.009) | 0.068 (±0.019) | 0.091 (±0.024) | p<0.001 A,B,C,F |
| 20.5 | 0.137 (±0.012) | 0.111 (±0.021) | 0.109 (±0.021) | 0.239 (±0.084) | p<0.001 C,E,F | |
| 21.5 | 0.177 (±0.016) | 0.119 (±0.011) | 0.115 (±0.010) | 0.422 (±0.123) | p<0.001 C,E,F | |
| TLW/BW (g) | 19.5 | 0.033 (±0.0020) | 0.028 (±0.0039) | 0.026 (±0.0100) | 0.033 (±0.0100) | NS |
| 20.5 | 0.025 (±0.0016) | 0.028 (±0.0010) | 0.027 (±0.0043) | 0.060 (±0.0200) | p<0.001 C,E,F | |
| 21.5 | 0.031 (±0.0020) | 0.024 (±0.0021) | 0.023 (±0.0017) | 0.075 (±0.0100) | p<0.05 A,B p<0.001 C,E,F |
GD: Gestational day; EC: External control; C: Control; S: Sham; TO: Tracheal occlusion; BW: Body weight; TLW: Total lung weight; TLW/BW: TLW/BW ratio. NS: Non-significant, A: EC x C; B: EC x S; C: EC x TO; D: C x S; E: C x TO; F: S x TO.
Figure 3Histological results: ET – Epithelial thickness (A), CT – Chondral thickness (B), TTT – Total trachea thickness (C), ECC – Epithelial cell count (D).
Figure 4Photomicrographs of tracheal sections from the four studied groups (EC, C, S and TO) on GD 21.5 showing increased epithelial thickness and decreased chondral thickness in the TO group. Bar = 250 μm.
Histological results in the different groups, expressed as the means and SD.
| GD | EC | C | S | TO | p-value | |
| ET (μm) | 19.5 | 16.17 (±2.427) | 16.88 (±2.285) | 16.73 (±2.848) | 17.01 (±1.703) | NS |
| 20.5 | 14.00 (±1.638) | 14.76 (±1.977) | 14.41 (±1.518) | 14.00 (±1.470) | NS | |
| 21.5 | 12.95 (±1.901) | 11.57 (±1.638) | 11.41 (±1.128) | 14.45 (±1.378) | p<0.05 E,F | |
| CT (μm) | 19.5 | 80.32 (±13.982) | 71.49 (±11.501) | 68.86 (±7.045) | 67.35 (±11.780) | NS |
| 20.5 | 98.13 (±6.322) | 94.55 (±8.420) | 86.95 (±13.262) | 78.12 (±13.014) | p<0.05 C | |
| 21.5 | 99.40 (±11.104) | 96.47 (±13.773) | 90.40 (±9.826) | 72.19 (±12.024) | p<0.05 C,E | |
| TTT (μm) | 19.5 | 147.93 (±32.475) | 118.40 (±16.960) | 113.44 (±9.598) | 111.56 (±10.138) | p<0.05 B,C |
| 20.5 | 138.62 (±12.302) | 142.44 (±7.142) | 132.68 (±14.606) | 119.12 (±13.084) | p<0.05 E | |
| 21.5 | 140.62 (±10.906) | 136.67 (±15.416) | 127.61 (±14.223) | 102.12 (±12.965) | p<0.05 E,F, p<0.001 C | |
| ECC (cell number) | 19.5 | 287 (±33.187) | 311 (±14.980) | 312 (±11.165) | 382 (±12.215) | p<0.001 C,E,F |
| 20.5 | 291 (±20.928) | 314 (±11.296) | 318 (±7.521) | 398 (±16.346) | p<0.05 B, p<0.001 C,E,F | |
| 21.5 | 295 (±13.277) | 323 (±24.367) | 325 (±9.704) | 401 (±48.798) | p<0.001 C,E,F |
GD: Gestational day; EC: External control; C: Control; S: Sham; TO: Tracheal occlusion; ET: Epithelial thickness; CT: Chondral thickness; TTT: Total tracheal thickness; ECC: Epithelial cell count. NS: Non-significant, A: EC x C; B: EC x S; C: EC x TO; D: C x S; E: C x TO; F: S x TO.