| Literature DB >> 23419805 |
Ahmad R Norhisham1, Faizah Abood, Muhamad Rita, Khalid Rehman Hakeem.
Abstract
Wood products are highly exposed to infestation by powder post beetles. Dinoderus minutus (bamboo borer) is a wood boring beetle that seriously damage dried bamboo and finished bamboo products. Management of D. minutus using pesticides showed negative effects on environment despite being very costly. By understanding influence of natural climatic conditions on their reproductive behaviour, could help us to develop a cost effective and environmental friendly strategy to cope up with this problem. In the present study, reproductive parameters and egg development of the bamboo borer were determined at 20%, 40%, 56%, 75% and 85% r.h. levels at constant temperature of 30° ± 2°C with 8 L-16D photoregime. From the results, eclosion to first instar larva was recorded at all relative humidities tested. The lowest shortest percentage of hatchability was recorded at 20% and 85% relative humidity with a mean incubation period of 4.63 ± 0.25 and 10.43 ± 0.32 days, respectively. It was noted that pre-ovipositional period decreased from 14.20 ± 0.49 to 7.20 ± 0.31 days as relative humidity increased from 20% to 75% and slightly increased to 8.00 ± 0.37 days at 85% relative humidity. We conclude that female beetles may have a particular hygropreference in oviposition as total egg production increased with increasing relative humidity.Entities:
Keywords: Bamboo borer; Bostrychidae; Dinoderus minutus; Egg hatchability; Powderpost beetle; Reproductive capacity
Year: 2013 PMID: 23419805 PMCID: PMC3569590 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Influence of relative humidity on egg eclosion
| Relative humidity | Egg development | |
|---|---|---|
| Incubation period (day) | Hatchability | |
| 20% | 4.63±0.25c | 8% |
| 40% | 5.79±0.13b | 66% |
| 56% | 5.49±0.18b | 74% |
| 75% | 5.44±0.14b | 86% |
| 85% | 10.43±0.32a | 48% |
Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (p≥0.05, Fisher’s least significant difference) N=50.
Effect of relative humidity on reproductive capacity
| Relative humidity | Reproductive parameter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preovipositional period (day) | Ovipositional period (day) | Mean no. of eggs laid per female | Female Lifespan (day) | Male Lifespan (day) | |
| 20% | 14.20±0.49a | 3.80±0.64d | 3.20±0.31d | 22.30±0.79c | 20.00±0.62c |
| 40% | 11.80±0.44b | 37.20±1.34c | 28.90±1.01c | 56.90±1.20b | 49.70±1.15b |
| 56% | 9.60±0.38c | 51.80±0.49b | 43.00±1.65b | 68.80±0.68a | 61.50±1.29a |
| 75% | 7.20±0.31c | 54.40±1.33a | 66.40±1.21a | 70.10±0.70a | 60.50±1.19a |
| 85% | 8.00±0.37d | 56.50±1.21a | 68.90±3.07a | 69.40±1.52a | 59.80±1.13a |
Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (p≥0.05, Fisher’s least significant difference) N=20.
Figure 1Age-specific fecundity curves ofat different relative humidities.
Figure 2Effects of different relative humidities onegg (x40): a. Newly laid egg; b. shrinkage of egg at 20% relative humidity; c. cuticular softening due to absorption of moisture at 56% relative humidity and d. swelling of prelarva within chorion at 85% relative humidity.