| Literature DB >> 23419635 |
Abstract
Public policies intended to induce behavioral change, specifically incentives to reduce interpersonal contacts or to "social distance," increasingly play a prominent role in public disease response strategies as governments plan for and respond to major epidemics. I compare social distancing incentives and outcomes under decentralized, full control social planner, and constrained social planner, without health class specific control, decision making scenarios. Constrained social planner decision making, based on non-health class specific controls, can in some instances make society worse off than decentralized decision making (i.e. no intervention). The oft neglected behavior of recovered and immune individuals is important for welfare and health outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23419635 PMCID: PMC3659402 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Econ ISSN: 0167-6296 Impact factor: 3.804