Most patients infected with 2009 swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus (S-OIV) suffered respiratory illness. Some severely infected patients developed acute lung injury (ALI) and even acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is the predominant cause for reported deaths[1]. After the pandemic, an analysis of data from flu cases in adults and children living in Wisconsin state of USA concluded that the symptoms and risk of complications from 2009 H1N1swine flu was not greater compared with either H1N1 or H3N2 seasonal flu[2]. The H1N1 pandemic flu was not linked to substantially more hospitalization or pneumonia than these recent seasonal flu strains[2]. However, a recent study estimated that the mortality associated with the 2009 H1N1swine flu was 15 times higher than the World Health Organization (WHO) reported[3], confirming that the 2009 S-OIV outbreak was a pandemic.Previous studies showed that excessive early cytokine responses with early recruitment of inflammatory immune cells to the lung were key contributors to the morbidity of the 1918 influenza and avian H5N1infection[4,5,6]. In patients with 2009 S-OIV H1N1 infection, plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines were higher among those who experienced fatal ARDS compared with those with non-fatal ARDS or mild S-OIV H1N1 illness[7]. Systemic levels of immune mediators associated with T helper 1 and T helper 17 responses were elevated in hospitalized patients infected with S-OIV H1N1, but not in outpatients with mild S-OIV H1N1 illness[8]. C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10), also known as interferon γ (IFN-γ)-induced protein 10 kDa (IP-10), was found to be significantly elevated in the serum of patients with ARDS induced by S-OIV H1N1 infection[7,8]. IP-10 is a proinflammatory cytokine belonging to the CXC chemokine family. After binding its unique receptor CXCR3, the seven transmembrane-spanning G protein-coupled receptor, IP-10 induces chemotaxis in different cell types of the immune system and plays an important role in the innate immune response. This is crucial for the initiation and subsequent direction of adaptive immune responses, as well as in promoting localized inflammation and producing cytokines that recruit additional leukocytes to the site of infection. In addition, previous studies showed that the proliferation of T cells upon allogeneic and antigenic stimulation and the secretion of IFN-γ in response to antigenic challenge were impaired in IP-10-deficient mice, suggesting that IP-10 plays an important role in T-cell attraction and activation[9]. Alterations in the IP-10 expression level have been shown to be associated with inflammatory diseases and tissue damage[10]. However, the functional role and molecular mechanism of IP-10 in the ALI induced by influenza virus infection remain unclear.During the 2009 swine flu pandemic, we recruited dozens of patients who were PCR positive for the 2009 S-OIV H1N1 and 9 patients with normal upper respiratory tract infections from two hospitals in Beijing, China[11]. We performed a Bio-plex cytokine assay on the serum samples from 23 qualified patients. The concentration of IP-10 in the serum of the 9 critical patients with ARDS was significantly elevated compared with the control group (Figure 1A), confirming the previous reports[7,8].
Figure 1
IP-10 plays a critical role in the ALI induced by 2009 S-OIV H1N1. (A) The concentration of IP-10 in the sera from patients infected with 2009 S-OIV H1N1 was determined using a Bio-Plex Human Cytokine Array. 4-week-old mice were anesthetized with 50 μl 1% (w/v) pentobarbital sodium and intranasally treated with 105.5 TCID50 of BJ501 H1N1 virus. (B) Survival rates of WT B6 mice and IP-10−/− mice (n = 15). (C) Changes in body weights of WT B6 mice and IP-10−/− mice. The values are means ± SEM from 15 mice. (D) Wet-to-dry ratios of lung of WT B6 mice and IP-10−/− mice (n = 6) at 5 days post infection (DPI). (E) HE staining and infiltrating cell count (n = 50 fields) in lung tissue of WT B6 mice and IP-10−/− mice (n = 3) at 5 DPI. (F, G) Virus load in lung tissue of WT B6 mice and IP-10−/− mice (n = 6) at 3 DPI. (H) Survival rates of WT B6 mice and PI3K−/− mice (n = 30). (I) Changes in body weights of WT B6 mice and PI3K−/− mice. The values are means ± SEM from 30 mice. (J) Wet-to-dry ratios of lungs from WT B6 mice and PI3K−/− mice (n = 8) at 5 DPI. (K) HE staining and infiltrating cell count (n = 50 fields) in lung tissue of WT B6 mice and PI3K−/− mice (n = 3) at 5 DPI. 4-week-old WT B6 mice were treated intravenously with 50 μg of anti-IP-10 or isotype-control antibodies per mouse 1 day before infection of BJ501 strain and at 1 DPI and 3 DPI. (L) Survival rates of treated B6 mice (n = 10). (M) Wet-to-dry ratios of lungs from treated B6 mice (n = 5) at 5 DPI. (N) HE staining and infiltrating cell count (n = 50 fields) in lung tissue of treated B6 mice (n = 3) at 5 DPI. (O) Concentration of IP-10 in the BALFs of treated B6 mice (n = 5) at 24 h post-infection. Magnification, 200×. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. All experiments were repeated at least three times.
We created an ALI model in mice infected with the A/Beijing/501/2009 (H1N1) (BJ501) strain isolated in China during the 2009 pandemic[11]. We measured the concentration of IP-10 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of BJ501 strain-infected wild-type (WT) mice and found that the IP-10 level was also significantly increased (Supplementary information, Figure S1A), confirming the important role of IP-10 in mediating ALI induced by 2009 S-OIV H1N1 infection.To elucidate the functional role of IP-10 in ALI, we infected the IP-10-deficient mice with the BJ501 strain and found that the survival rate of the mice was significantly improved compared with the infected WT mice (Figure 1B), and body weight losses in IP-10-deficient mice were reduced (Figure 1C). The pulmonary edema measured by wet-to-dry lung weight ratio in IP-10-deficient mice was significantly ameliorated (Figure 1D). The lung histopathology of IP-10-deficient mice was greatly improved, and the leukocyte infiltration cell counts significantly decreased (Figure 1E). In addition, the virus load of infected IP-10-deficient mice was significantly decreased compared with that of WT mice (Figure 1F and 1G). To test whether this finding is common in other influenza virus infections, we infected the IP-10-deficient mice with the mouse-adapted influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8) strain and obtained similar results (Supplementary information, Figure S2). Taken together, these results suggest that IP-10 elevation is critical in influenza virus infection-induced mouse ALI.To further elucidate the signaling pathways through which IP-10 may lead to ALI, we infected IP-10-deficient mice with the 2009 pandemic influenzaBJ501 strain and performed western blot analysis. We found that the Akt-p38-ATF2 pathway was involved in BJ501 strain-induced ALI (Supplementary information, Figure S4A). PI3K is upstream of the Akt-p38-ATF2 pathway. We then infected the PI3K-deficient mice with BJ501 strain and found that the ALI was significantly ameliorated compared with the infected WT mice (Figure 1H, 1I, 1J, 1K). We obtained similar results in the PR8 strain-infected PI3K-deficient mice (Supplementary information, Figure S3). These data indicate that the PI3K-Akt-p38-ATF2 signaling pathway may be involved in the ALI mediated by IP-10 in BJ501 strain-infected mice. We also found that the JNK/MAPK signaling pathway was significantly downregulated in the BJ501 strain-infected IP-10-deficient mice compared with the control mice (Supplementary information, Figure S4B), suggesting that the JNK/MAPK signaling pathway may also play a critical role in IP-10-mediated ALI by BJ501infection in mice. A proposed schematic model of IP-10 signaling in the regulation of ALI in our BJ501 strain-infected mouse model is shown (Supplementary information, Figure S4C), providing potential targets for the treatment of ALI induced by S-OIV H1N1 infection.Although corticosteroid was shown effective in treating mouse ALI induced by 2009 S-OIV H1N1 infection[12], modulation of the host immune response with less selective pressure on viral populations is enticing. MDX-1100, a fully human anti-IP-10 monoclonal antibody, is well tolerated and demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who responded inadequately to Methotrexate in a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[13]. To test whether monoclonal antibody against IP-10 could protect against the ALI induced by the 2009 S-OIV H1N1 infection, we treated BJ501 strain-infected mice with monoclonal antibody against humanIP-10. We found that the survival rate of the infected mice treated with anti-IP-10 monoclonal antibody was significantly increased compared with isotype control-treated mice (Figure 1L). The formation of lung edema and lung histopathology alterations in the anti-IP-10 monoclonal antibody-treated mice were significantly improved (Figure 1M and 1N). After treatment with anti-IP-10 monoclonal antibody, the levels of responsive cytokines and chemokines were also significantly reduced in the infected mice compared with the infected mice treated with isotype control (Figure 1O and Supplementary information, Figure S5A). We then treated PR8 strain-infected mice with the monoclonal antibody against humanIP-10 and found that it could also significantly ameliorate the ALI induced by PR8 strain infection (Supplementary information, Figure S6). Altogether, these data suggest that therapeutic anti-IP-10 monoclonal antibody treatment may be a useful remedy for the future influenza A (H1N1) virus pandemic.A recent study demonstrated that IP-10 response enhanced the development of neutrophil-mediated fulminant lung injury of viral and non-viral origin[14]. Similar to our results, they found that IP-10 was elevated in sera of patients with ARDS and the mice lacking IP-10 or CXCR3 demonstrated improved severity and survival of non-viral and viral ALI. They further identified that neutrophil was the main source of IP-10 production in the fulminant pulmonary inflammation. However, our data provide the molecular signaling mechanism linking ALI pathogenesis and the role of IP-10 in lung failure. To our knowledge, we are the first to systematically demonstrate that PI3K-Akt-p38-ATF2 and JNK/MAPK signaling pathways are involved in the ALI mediated by IP-10 in 2009 S-OIV H1N1-infectedmice. As the elevation of IP-10 level was also found in the serum of patients infected with SARS, avian H5N1influenza virus, and hepatitis C virus[5,10,15], our data may assist in elucidating the functional role of IP-10 in the tissue pathogenesis of these viral infections. Moreover, our results show that treatment with monoclonal antibodies against IP-10 improved the survival rate and ameliorated the ALI induced by influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in mice, revealing an effective approach to achieve immunotherapy for any future influenza A (H1N1) virus pandemic. Detailed methods are described in the Supplementary information, Data S1.
Authors: Jennifer H Dufour; Michelle Dziejman; Michael T Liu; Josephine H Leung; Thomas E Lane; Andrew D Luster Journal: J Immunol Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Akihiko Ichikawa; Keiji Kuba; Masayuki Morita; Shinsuke Chida; Hiroyuki Tezuka; Hiromitsu Hara; Takehiko Sasaki; Toshiaki Ohteki; V Marco Ranieri; Claudia C dos Santos; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Shizuo Akira; Andrew D Luster; Bao Lu; Josef M Penninger; Stefan Uhlig; Arthur S Slutsky; Yumiko Imai Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Edward A Belongia; Stephanie A Irving; Stephen C Waring; Laura A Coleman; Jennifer K Meece; Mary Vandermause; Stephen Lindstrom; Debra Kempf; David K Shay Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Darwyn Kobasa; Steven M Jones; Kyoko Shinya; John C Kash; John Copps; Hideki Ebihara; Yasuko Hatta; Jin Hyun Kim; Peter Halfmann; Masato Hatta; Friederike Feldmann; Judie B Alimonti; Lisa Fernando; Yan Li; Michael G Katze; Heinz Feldmann; Yoshihiro Kawaoka Journal: Nature Date: 2007-01-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Janice K Louie; Meileen Acosta; Kathleen Winter; Cynthia Jean; Shilpa Gavali; Robert Schechter; Duc Vugia; Kathleen Harriman; Bela Matyas; Carol A Glaser; Michael C Samuel; Jon Rosenberg; John Talarico; Douglas Hatch Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thomas Reiberger; Judith H Aberle; Michael Kundi; Norbert Kohrgruber; Armin Rieger; Alfred Gangl; Heidemarie Holzmann; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2008
Authors: Menno D de Jong; Cameron P Simmons; Tran Tan Thanh; Vo Minh Hien; Gavin J D Smith; Tran Nguyen Bich Chau; Dang Minh Hoang; Nguyen Van Vinh Chau; Truong Huu Khanh; Vo Cong Dong; Phan Tu Qui; Bach Van Cam; Do Quang Ha; Yi Guan; J S Malik Peiris; Nguyen Tran Chinh; Tran Tinh Hien; Jeremy Farrar Journal: Nat Med Date: 2006-09-10 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Kelvin K W To; Ivan F N Hung; Iris W S Li; Kar-Lung Lee; Chi-Kwan Koo; Wing-Wa Yan; Raymond Liu; Ka-Ying Ho; Kwok-Hong Chu; Chi-Leung Watt; Wei-Kwang Luk; Kang-Yiu Lai; Fu-Loi Chow; Thomas Mok; Tom Buckley; Jasper F W Chan; Samson S Y Wong; Bojian Zheng; Honglin Chen; Candy C Y Lau; Herman Tse; Vincent C C Cheng; Kwok-Hung Chan; Kwok-Yung Yuen Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jesus F Bermejo-Martin; Raul Ortiz de Lejarazu; Tomas Pumarola; Jordi Rello; Raquel Almansa; Paula Ramírez; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; David Varillas; Maria C Gallegos; Carlos Serón; Dariela Micheloud; Jose Manuel Gomez; Alberto Tenorio-Abreu; María J Ramos; M Lourdes Molina; Samantha Huidobro; Elia Sanchez; Mónica Gordón; Victoria Fernández; Alberto Del Castillo; Ma Angeles Marcos; Beatriz Villanueva; Carlos Javier López; Mario Rodríguez-Domínguez; Juan-Carlos Galan; Rafael Cantón; Aurora Lietor; Silvia Rojo; Jose M Eiros; Carmen Hinojosa; Isabel Gonzalez; Nuria Torner; David Banner; Alberto Leon; Pablo Cuesta; Thomas Rowe; David J Kelvin Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Bindumadhav M Marathe; Guha Asthagiri Arunkumar; Peter Vogel; Philippe Noriel Q Pascua; Jeremy Jones; Richard J Webby; Florian Krammer; Elena A Govorkova Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Tyler J Wellman; Nicolas de Prost; Mauro Tucci; Tilo Winkler; Rebecca M Baron; Piotr Filipczak; Benjamin Raby; Jen-Hwa Chu; R Scott Harris; Guido Musch; Luiz F Dos Reis Falcao; Vera Capelozzi; Jose G Venegas; Marcos F Vidal Melo Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: David Groeger; Elisa Schiavi; Ray Grant; Magdalena Kurnik-Łucka; David Michalovich; Rick Williamson; Soren Beinke; Barry Kiely; Cezmi A Akdis; Edith M Hessel; Fergus Shanahan; Liam O' Mahony Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Daniel Reynolds; Cristina Vazquez Guillamet; Aaron Day; Nicholas Borcherding; Rodrigo Vazquez Guillamet; José Alberto Choreño-Parra; Stacey L House; Jane A O'Halloran; Joaquín Zúñiga; Ali H Ellebedy; Derek E Byers; Philip A Mudd Journal: J Immunol Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 5.426
Authors: Sarah S Comstock; Kari Hortos; Bruce Kovan; Sarah McCaskey; Dorothy R Pathak; Jenifer I Fenton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 3.240