| Literature DB >> 23418464 |
Robert A Pope1, Satya Parida, Dalan Bailey, Joe Brownlie, Thomas Barrett, Ashley C Banyard.
Abstract
Peste-des-petits ruminants virus (PPRV) is a viral pathogen that causes a devastating plague of small ruminants. PPRV is an economically significant disease that continues to be a major obstacle to the development of sustainable agriculture across the developing world. The current understanding of PPRV pathogenesis has been heavily assumed from the closely related rinderpest virus (RPV) and other morbillivirus infections alongside data derived from field outbreaks. There have been few studies reported that have focused on the pathogenesis of PPRV and very little is known about the processes underlying the early stages of infection. In the present study, 15 goats were challenged by the intranasal route with a virulent PPRV isolate, Côte d'Ivoire '89 (CI/89) and sacrificed at strategically defined time-points post infection to enable pre- and post-mortem sampling. This approach enabled precise monitoring of the progress and distribution of virus throughout the infection from the time of challenge, through peak viraemia and into a period of convalescence. Observations were then related to findings of previous field studies and experimental models of PPRV to develop a clinical scoring system for PPRV. Importantly, histopathological investigations demonstrated that the initial site for virus replication is not within the epithelial cells of the respiratory mucosa, as has been previously reported, but is within the tonsillar tissue and lymph nodes draining the site of inoculation. We propose that virus is taken up by immune cells within the respiratory mucosa which then transport virus to lymphoid tissues where primary virus replication occurs, and from where virus enters circulation. Based on these findings we propose a novel clinical scoring methodology for PPRV pathogenesis and suggest a fundamental shift away from the conventional model of PPRV pathogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23418464 PMCID: PMC3572172 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical score sheet for assessment of animals infected with PPRV.
| Clinicalscore | General signs | Pyrexic response | Ocular/nasal discharge | Facial mucosal lesions | Faeces | Respiratory symptoms |
|
| Normal | <39.5°C | None | None | Normal | Normal respiration rate (Sheep:15–40*; Goats: 10–30**) |
|
| Mildly inactive | >39.5°C but <40°C | Watery oculardischarge | Congested oronasal mucosaand buccal papillae | Soft | Slight tachypnoea |
|
| Mildly inactive anddepressed, mildinappetance | >40°C but <41°C | Watery to mucoid oculonasal discharge: reddened eyes andmild conjunctivitis | Pin-prick lesions within buccalcavity, with some becomingmore extensive | Runny | Tachypnoea/mild cough |
|
| Inactive, apathetic,restless andanorexic | >41°C or >39.5°Cfor >5days | Mucopurulent nasaldischarge and/or severeconjunctivitis with mucopurulent oculardischarge | Clear erosive lesions onoronasal mucosae; severelycongested/oedematousbuccal papillae | Frank diarrhoea | Tachypnoea and dyspnoea/coughing present |
|
| Severe depression,unable to stand,extreme lethargy,dehydration | >41°C or >39.5°Cfor >5 daysfollowed byrapid fall intemperature(<38°C*) | Mucopurulent nasaldischarge and severeconjunctivitis withprofuse mucopurulentocular discharge | Severe erosive/ulcerativelesions throughout buccalcavity, nasal mucosa andnares; oedematous lips anderosions on vulval labia | Muco-haemorrhagic diarrhoea | Marked tachypnoea/dyspnoea/cough |
When animal reaches a score of 20 they need to be killed on ethical grounds. The decision to euthanase would be based on the following criteria: 1) A score of 4 is achieved in "General Signs“; 2).
A score of 3 is achieved in "General Signs" for 2 complete, consecutive days and a score of 10 or greater is achieved in other categories; 3) A.
score of 2 is achieved in "General Signs" for 2 complete, consecutive days and a score of 15 or greater is achieved in other categories. (*Hecker.
(1983) The sheep as an experimental animal. Academic Press, London; **Smith and Sherman (2009) Goat Medicine, Wiley-Blackwell. Ames,
Iowa, USA).
Figure 1Clinical disease following experimental inoculation.
Experimentally inoculated animals were graded by clinical observation for the development of disease consistent with infection with PPRV. Individual animal scores are shown for each sampling point with the standard deviation around the mean being illustrated.
Figure 2Clinical monitoring and serological response following infection with the PPRV CI/89 strain. a)
Average rectal temperatures of goats infected with PPRV CI/89. The dashed dotted line indicates the temperature cut-off value above which animals were considered pyrexic (39.5°C). Average values are plotted for infected (n = 15) against control (n = 3) animals with standard deviation around the mean being shown. Animal numbers reduce in line with the staggered euthanasia performed; b) Infection induced leucopaenia following infection with PPRV CI/89. PBL counts are expressed as a percentage change from the three-day, pre-challenge average of each goat’s PBL counts. Mean values and standard deviation is shown at each time point (Day 0 PBL counts taken as 100%); c) Serological responses following inoculation with the PPRV CI/89 strain in the animals that remained at the end of the study (n = 3). The PI cut off value for seropositivity is denoted by a dotted line.
Molecular detection of viral nucleic acid by RT-PCR.
| Time post-challenge | Sample | No. animals positive for the presence of viral RNA/number (P/T) | |||
| PPRV Côte d’Ivoire | Control animals | ||||
| F1b–F2d | F1–F2 | F1b–F2d | F1–F2 | ||
| Day 0 | PBL | 0/15 | 0/15 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Eye swab | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Day 2 | PBL | 0/15 | 0/15 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Eye swab | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Day 5 | PBL | 0/12 | 12/12 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Eye swab | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Day 7 | PBL | 4/9 | 9/9 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Eye swab | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Day 9 | PBL | 4/6 | 6/6 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| Eye swab | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Day 12 | PBL | 2/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| Eye swab | 2/3 | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Day 14 | PBL | 2/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| Eye swab | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Day 21 | PBL | 1/3 | 2/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| Eye swab | 2/3 | 3/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
RNA was extracted from eye swabs or PBLs and subjected to RT-PCR. The PCR product obtained by using the diagnostic primer set F1b-F2d was used as template for the nested PCR (primer set F1–F2). P = Number of animals positive for the presence of viral nucleic acid; T = Number of animals tested.
Antigen detection within lymphoid tissues at different days post inoculation following challenge with the CI/89 strain of PPRV.
| Antigen detection in post mortem tissues | ||||
| Day 5 | Day 7 | Day 9 | ||
|
| Subcapsular Area | +/++ | +++ | ++ |
| Follicle/Mantle | 0/+ | ++ | +/++ | |
| Germinal Centre | + | ++ | + | |
| Paracortex | ++/+++ | ++/+++ | +/++ | |
| Medulla | +/++ | ++ | 0/+ | |
|
| Subcapsular Area | + | +++ | ++/+++ |
| Follicle/Mantle | 0 | ++/+++ | +/++ | |
| Germinal Centre | 0/+ | ++ | + | |
| Paracortex | ++ | ++/+++ | ++ | |
| Medulla | +/++ | ++ | + | |
|
| Subcapsular Area | ++ | ++/+++ | ++/+++ |
| Follicle/Mantle | + | +/++ | +/++ | |
| Germinal Centre | + | +/++ | + | |
| Paracortex | +/++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Medulla | ++ | + | + | |
|
| Subcapsular Area | + | ++ | ++ |
| Follicle/Mantle | 0 | +/++ | +/++ | |
| Germinal Centre | 0/+ | + | + | |
| Paracortex | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Medulla | ++/+ | +/++ | + | |
|
| Subcapsular Area | + | ++/+++ | +++ |
| Follicle/Mantle | 0/+ | +/++ | ++/+++ | |
| Germinal Centre | 0/+ | ++ | ++ | |
| Paracortex | +/++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Medulla | + | + | +/++ | |
|
| Follicle/Mantle | 0/+ | ++/+++ | ++ |
| Germinal Centre | 0/+ | +++ | +/++ | |
| Diffuse Lymphoid Tissue | ++ | +++ | ++ | |
| Crypt Epithelium | + | ++/+++ | +++ | |
|
| PALS | 0 | + | +/++ |
| Follicle/Mantle | 0 | / | / | |
| Germinal Centre | 0 | / | / | |
| Red Pulp | 0 | 0/+ | + | |
Tissues were taken on days 2, 5, 7, 9 and 21 and antigen detection was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results for days 2 and 21 are omitted as all tissues analysed were negative for virus antigen. Average immunolabelling grades are given following analysis of tissues from 3 animals euthanased at each timepoint. Grades are formulated on a result of viral antigen density throughout a uniform tissue type. Sections were graded on three separate occasions, without referring to previous recorded results to help standardise the classification. Immunolabelling grades are defined as: 0 = No immunolabelling seen; + = Mild immunolabelling; ++ = Moderate immunolabelling; +++ = Marked immunolabelling. Intermediate grades exist between the above four categories to give the analysis a greater degree of flexibility. /− Tissue type not present within section.
Figure 3PPRV IHC on sections of lymphoid tissue taken at PME showing pertinent features of PPRV infection. a)
A greater degree of immunolabelling (arrows) is seen in the paracortex (PC) (arrows) of the RPLN than in the cortex (C) (5 dpi); b) Antigen distribution in the subcapsular layer and the follicles at 7 dpi in the MLN. Paracortical virus antigen still remains (arrows); c) Primarily cortical immunolabelling within the RPLN (9 dpi) with antigen also remaining within the PC; d) In contrast to b) the germinal center of this follicle within the MLN contains virus antigen that is absent from the follicular mantle (9 dpi); e) Intense immunolabelling within the LPSLN medulla (5 dpi) with extensive syncytia formation (arrows); f) Predominately peripheral paracortical immunolabelling of syncytia within the LPSLN (7 dpi). Dendritic-type cells also present and positive for virus antigen (arrow) with an infected lymphocyte also present (open arrow); g) Immunolabelling within pharyngeal tonsil (5 dpi) indicating early epithelial infection noted both basally (open arrow) adjacent to an infected lymphoid follicle (F) and apically, abutting the crypt lumen (solid arrow); h) Advanced epithelial infection of the pharyngeal tonsil (7 dpi) with syncytia formation. All scale bars represent 100 µm.
Figure 4PPRV IHC on sections of facial epithelial tissue. a)
Nasal mucosal epithelium (7 dpi). Immunolabelling of lymphoid (arrow) and epithelial cells (open arrow) indicating early PPRV infection of the nasal lamina propria (LP) and mucosal epithelium. Epithelial immunolabelling is noted almost exclusively in basal layers, surrounding LP papillae, with extension into the stratum spinosum; b) Lingual mucosal epithelium (9 dpi) Immunolabelling indicative of early infection in both the basal epithelium and stratum spinosum (arrow) alongside positively labelled immune cells in the LP (open arrow); c) Conjunctival mucosal epithelium (9 dpi). Evidence of advanced epithelial and proprial infection involving a mixed population of inflammatory and epithelial cells around an exocrine gland (arrows). Note in particular the immunolabelling within the proprial lymphoid follicle circumscribed by this gland (open arrow); d) Nasal skin (9 dpi) - marked epithelial infection and erosion (arrow) in and around two hair follicles; e) Labial mucosal epithelium (9 dpi) Following epithelial infection, lymphoid follicles were often seen to have formed in the LP of facial mucosae. Here a large lumber of positively immunolabelled lymphoid cells are seen (arrows); f) Labial mucosal epithelium (9 dpi) with a large epithelial syncytium (arrow) seen in the lower stratum spinosum layer. All scale bars represent 100 µm.
Figure 5PPRV IHC on sections of digestive tract tissue taken at PME showing pertinent features of PPRV infection. a)
An isolated focus of virus antigen detected in the omasum (7 dpi) in an area of epithelial trauma; b) Marked immunolabelling both of the epithelial (arrow) and proprial cells (open arrows) within the oesophagus (9 dpi); c) Foci of infection within abomasal crypts amongst lymphoid cells including a small syncytium (arrow); d) Severe abomasal infection (9 dpi) of crypt epithelial cells (arrows); e) Positively labelled lymphocytes (arrows) disperse throughout the lamina propria (LP) of the rectum (9 dpi); f) A lymphoid aggregate in rectal epithelia (9 dpi) taking the form of a true follicle with a germinal centre (arrow) containing many positively immunolabelled lymphocytes; g) Positive immunolabelling in the caecum (7 dpi) seen abundantly in proprial lymphocytes and within caecal glands (arrows) alongside a lymphoid syncytium (open arrow); h) Marked viral infection of both glandular epithelial cells and the immune/inflammatory cells present within the caecum (9 dpi). All scale bars represent 100 µm.