Literature DB >> 23418251

Assessing the health care needs of women in rural British Columbia: development and validation of a survey tool.

Meghan Guy1, Wendy V Norman, Unjali Malhotra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To design reliable survey instruments to evaluate needs and expectations for provision of women's health services in rural communities in British Columbia (BC). These tools will aim to plan programming for, and evaluate effectiveness of, a women's health enhanced skills residency program at the University of British Columbia.
DESIGN: A qualitative design that included administration of written surveys and on-site interviews in several rural communities.
SETTING: Three communities participated in initial questionnaire and interview administration. A fourth community participated in the second interview iteration. Participating communities did not have obstetrician-gynecologists but did have hospitals capable of supporting outpatient specialized women's health procedural care. PARTICIPANTS: Community physicians, leaders of community groups serving women, and allied health providers, in Vancouver Island, Southeast Interior BC, and Northern BC.
METHODS: Two preliminary questionnaires were developed to assess local specialized women's health services based on the curriculum of the enhanced skills training program; one was designed for physicians and the other for women's community group leaders and aboriginal health and community group leaders. Interview questions were designed to ensure the survey could be understood and to identify important areas of women's health not included on the initial questionnaires. Results were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods, and a second draft of the questionnaires was developed for a second iteration of interviews. MAIN
FINDINGS: Clarity and comprehension of questionnaires were good; however, nonphysician participants answered that they were unsure on many questions pertaining to specific services. Topics identified as important and missing from questionnaires included violence and mental health. A second version of the questionnaires was shown to have addressed these concerns.
CONCLUSION: Through iterations of pilot testing, we created 2 validated survey instruments for implementation as a component of program evaluation. Testing in remote locations highlighted unique rural concerns, such that University of British Columbia health care professional training will now better serve BC community needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23418251      PMCID: PMC3576964     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  5 in total

1.  Measuring patient satisfaction with anaesthesia: perioperative questionnaire versus standardised face-to-face interview.

Authors:  M Bauer; H Böhrer; G Aichele; A Bach; E Martin
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 2.  Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care: what is patient satisfaction, how should it be measured, and what is the evidence for assuring high patient satisfaction?

Authors:  Thomas Heidegger; Detlef Saal; Matthias Nuebling
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2006-06

3.  The development of an evaluation questionnaire for the Newcastle Crisis Assessment and Home Treatment Service: finding a way to include the voices of service users.

Authors:  C Hopkins; S Niemiec
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.952

4.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

Authors:  J E Brazier; R Harper; N M Jones; A O'Cathain; K J Thomas; T Usherwood; L Westlake
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-18

5.  Parent satisfaction with children's medical care. Development, field test, and validation of a questionnaire.

Authors:  C C Lewis; D E Scott; R H Pantell; M H Wolf
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.983

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.