Literature DB >> 2341816

Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads. Comparison of recently proposed ECG and VCG criteria for distinguishing posterolateral myocardial infarction from prominent anterior forces in normal subjects.

M J Zema1.   

Abstract

Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads may be present in patients with posterior myocardial infarction, right ventricular hypertrophy, various conduction disturbances, and some forms of cardiomyopathy and in clinically otherwise normal subjects with prominent anterior electromotive forces. Clinical uncertainty most often arises in distinguishing possible prior posterolateral myocardial infarction (PMI) from the unusual normal variant (PAF). The ECGs and VCGs of 15 subjects with posterolateral infarction were compared with tracings from 12 subjects with no evidence of cardiac disease, all individuals demonstrating tall R waves (R/S greater than 1.0 in V1 and/or V2) in the right precordial leads on surface ECG. By standard ECG, the infarction group was characterized by taller T waves in leads V1 and V2, shorter T waves in V6, greater T2-T6 index, and a more negative two variable function as described by Nestico. By VCG, the infarction group was characterized by a more anteriorly oriented T loop, more leftward maximal frontal plane QRS vector and a lower calculated -45 degrees/ab, as described by Suzuki. An algorithm was proposed that permitted proper classification (PAF vs. PMI) based on ECG criteria in 75% of subjects with 90% accuracy. This compared favorably with performance of the Frank vectorcardiogram, including using more recently proposed criteria. Routine use of the VCG, therefore, in this clinical setting may no longer be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341816     DOI: 10.1016/0022-0736(90)90135-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  4 in total

1.  Chest pain in a patient with a tall R wave in V1.

Authors:  Kenneth McManus; Gregory Condos; Andrew Lin
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-08-22

Review 2.  Electrovectorcardiographic diagnosis of left septal fascicular block: anatomic and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez Riera; Celso Ferreira; Celso Ferreira Filho; Adriano Meneghini; Augusto Hiroshi Uchida; Paulo Jorge Moffa; Edgardo Schapachnik; Sergio Dubner; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  The tetrafascicular nature of the intraventricular conduction system.

Authors:  Andrés R Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz C de Abreu; Kjell Nikus
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Posterior myocardial infarction: the dark side of the moon.

Authors:  E O F van Gorselen; F W A Verheugt; B T J Meursing; A J M Oude Ophuis
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.