BACKGROUND: Recurrences in primary localized alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (RMA) are common. Post-relapse survival is poor. We evaluated prognostic factors including relapse treatment in patients with recurrent RMA. METHODS: Relapses occurred in 115/235 patients with nonmetastatic RMA treated in four consecutive CWS-trials after achievement of a complete remission. Sufficient information about post-relapse treatment and outcome could be obtained in 99 patients and was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Nine of 99 patients received no salvage therapy and died after a median of 2 months. The remaining 90 patients received multimodal relapse treatment including mandatory chemotherapy. Recurrences were grossly resected in 39 patients; 57 patients received radiation. At a median follow-up from relapse of 8 years, 20 patients were alive and disease-free (5-year post-relapse survival [PROS] 21.3 ± 8). All surviving patients apart from a single individual had an isolated, circumscribed recurrence. Sixteen of 20 survivors were treated with adequate local relapse therapy (ALRT, i.e., either complete resection or gross resection + radiation). Survival in the subgroup of 27 individuals with circumscribed recurrences and ALRT was significantly better (PROS 53.7 ± 19) compared with disseminated recurrences and/or tumors treated without ALRT. Absence of primary lymph node involvement, circumscribed relapses, ALRT, and achievement of a second CR were identified as independent favorable risk factors. CONCLUSION: Post-relapse survival for primary localized RMA is generally poor. However, certain patient groups differed significantly in their likelihood of survival and 50% of patients with circumscribed relapses treated with ALRT survived. These findings may form the basis for an evidence-based risk-stratification for recurrent disease including relapse treatment.
BACKGROUND: Recurrences in primary localized alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (RMA) are common. Post-relapse survival is poor. We evaluated prognostic factors including relapse treatment in patients with recurrent RMA. METHODS: Relapses occurred in 115/235 patients with nonmetastatic RMA treated in four consecutive CWS-trials after achievement of a complete remission. Sufficient information about post-relapse treatment and outcome could be obtained in 99 patients and was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Nine of 99 patients received no salvage therapy and died after a median of 2 months. The remaining 90 patients received multimodal relapse treatment including mandatory chemotherapy. Recurrences were grossly resected in 39 patients; 57 patients received radiation. At a median follow-up from relapse of 8 years, 20 patients were alive and disease-free (5-year post-relapse survival [PROS] 21.3 ± 8). All surviving patients apart from a single individual had an isolated, circumscribed recurrence. Sixteen of 20 survivors were treated with adequate local relapse therapy (ALRT, i.e., either complete resection or gross resection + radiation). Survival in the subgroup of 27 individuals with circumscribed recurrences and ALRT was significantly better (PROS 53.7 ± 19) compared with disseminated recurrences and/or tumors treated without ALRT. Absence of primary lymph node involvement, circumscribed relapses, ALRT, and achievement of a second CR were identified as independent favorable risk factors. CONCLUSION: Post-relapse survival for primary localized RMA is generally poor. However, certain patient groups differed significantly in their likelihood of survival and 50% of patients with circumscribed relapses treated with ALRT survived. These findings may form the basis for an evidence-based risk-stratification for recurrent disease including relapse treatment.
Authors: Leo Mascarenhas; Yueh-Yun Chi; Pooja Hingorani; James R Anderson; Elizabeth R Lyden; David A Rodeberg; Daniel J Indelicato; Simon C Kao; Roshni Dasgupta; Sheri L Spunt; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Meerim Park; Jun Ah Lee; Hye Young Jin; Joo-Young Kim; Jong Woong Park; June Hyuk Kim; Hyun Guy Kang; Seog Yun Park; Eun Young Park; Hyeon Jin Park; Byung Kiu Park Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-07-23 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Eva Brack; Marco Wachtel; Anja Wolf; Andres Kaech; Urs Ziegler; Beat W Schäfer Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: S Gallego; D Bernabeu; M Garrido-Pontnou; G Guillen; N Hindi; A Juan-Ribelles; C Márquez; C Mata; J Orcajo; G Ramírez; M Ramos; C Romagosa; D Ruano; P Rubio; R Vergés; C Valverde Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Christine M Heske; Yueh-Yun Chi; Rajkumar Venkatramani; Minjie Li; Michael A Arnold; Roshni Dasgupta; Susan M Hiniker; Douglas S Hawkins; Leo Mascarenhas Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Bas Vaarwerk; Coralie Mallebranche; Maria C Affinita; Johanna H van der Lee; Andrea Ferrari; Julia C Chisholm; Anne-Sophie Defachelles; Gian Luca De Salvo; Nadège Corradini; Veronique Minard-Colin; Carlo Morosi; Hervé J Brisse; Kieran McHugh; Gianni Bisogno; Rick R van Rijn; Daniel Orbach; Johannes H M Merks Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 6.860