Literature DB >> 23417572

Effect of a chitosan additive to a Sn2+-containing toothpaste on its anti-erosive/anti-abrasive efficacy--a controlled randomised in situ trial.

N Schlueter1, J Klimek, C Ganss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is well known that Sn(2+) is a notable anti-erosive agent. There are indications that biopolymers such as chitosan can enhance the effect of Sn(2+), at least in vitro. However, little information exists about their anti-erosive/anti-abrasive in situ effects. In the present in situ study, the efficacy of Sn(2+)-containing toothpastes in the presence or absence of chitosan was tested.
METHODS: Ten subjects participated in the randomised crossover study, wearing mandibular appliances with human enamel specimens. Specimens were extraorally demineralised (7 days, 0.5% citric acid, pH 2.6; 6 × 2 min/day) and intraorally exposed to toothpaste suspensions (2 × 2 min/day). Within the suspension immersion time, one half of the specimens were additionally brushed intraorally with a powered toothbrush (5 s, 2.5 N). Tested preparations were a placebo toothpaste (negative control), two experimental toothpastes (F/Sn = 1,400 ppm F(-), 3,500 ppm Sn(2+); F/Sn/chitosan = 1,400 ppm F(-), 3,500 ppm Sn(2+), 0.5 % chitosan) and an SnF2-containing gel (positive control, GelKam = 3,000 ppm Sn(2+), 1,000 ppm F(-)). Substance loss was quantified profilometrically (μm).
RESULTS: In the placebo group, tissue loss was 11.2 ± 4.6 (immersion in suspension) and 17.7 ± 4.7 (immersion in suspension + brushing). Immersion in each Sn(2+)-containing suspension significantly reduced tissue loss (p ≤ 0.01); after immersion in suspension + brushing, only the treatments with GelKam (5.4 ± 5.5) and with F/Sn/chitosan (9.6 ± 5.6) significantly reduced loss [both p ≤ 0.05 compared to placebo; F/Sn 12.8 ± 6.4 (not significant)]
CONCLUSION: Chitosan enhanced the efficacy of the Sn(2+)-containing toothpaste as an anti-erosive/anti-abrasive agent. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of Sn(2+)- and chitosan-containing toothpaste is a good option for symptomatic therapy in patients with regular acid impacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23417572     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-0941-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  32 in total

1.  A comparison of the erosive potential of different beverages in primary and permanent teeth using an in vitro model.

Authors:  A Lussi; N Kohler; D Zero; M Schaffner; B Megert
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.612

2.  Investigation of erosion and abrasion on enamel and dentine: a model in situ using toothpastes of different abrasivity.

Authors:  S Hooper; N X West; M J Pickles; A Joiner; R G Newcombe; M Addy
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.728

3.  Efficacy of waiting periods and topical fluoride treatment on toothbrush abrasion of eroded enamel in situ.

Authors:  C Ganss; N Schlueter; D Friedrich; J Klimek
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Impact of toothpaste slurry abrasivity and toothbrush filament stiffness on abrasion of eroded enamel - an in vitro study.

Authors:  Annette Wiegand; Martina Schwerzmann; Beatrice Sener; Ana Carolina Magalhaes; Malgorzata Roos; Dirk Ziebolz; Thomas Imfeld; Thomas Attin
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Understanding the adsorption mechanism of chitosan onto poly(lactide-co-glycolide) particles.

Authors:  Chunqiang Guo; Richard A Gemeinhart
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.571

6.  Correlation of microhardness and wear in differently eroded bovine dental enamel.

Authors:  T Attin; U Koidl; W Buchalla; H G Schaller; A M Kielbassa; E Hellwig
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.633

7.  Effect of zeta potential and surface energy on bacterial adhesion to uncoated and saliva-coated human enamel and dentin.

Authors:  A H Weerkamp; H M Uyen; H J Busscher
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Conventional and anti-erosion fluoride toothpastes: effect on enamel erosion and erosion-abrasion.

Authors:  C Ganss; A Lussi; O Grunau; J Klimek; N Schlueter
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Effect of sodium, amine and stannous fluoride at the same concentration and different pH on in vitro erosion.

Authors:  Annette Wiegand; Dominique Bichsel; Ana Carolina Magalhães; Klaus Becker; Thomas Attin
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Investigation of the effect of various fluoride compounds and preparations thereof on erosive tissue loss in enamel in vitro.

Authors:  N Schlueter; A Duran; J Klimek; C Ganss
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  14 in total

1.  In situ evaluation of desensitizing toothpastes for protecting against erosive tooth wear and its characterization.

Authors:  Raquel Marianna Lopes; T Scaramucci; Clandler L Walker; S A Feitosa; Ana Cecilia Correa Aranha
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  The use of fluoride for the prevention of dental erosion and erosive tooth wear in children and adolescents.

Authors:  A Lussi; M A R Buzalaf; D Duangthip; V Anttonen; C Ganss; S H João-Souza; T Baumann; T S Carvalho
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Chitosan Use in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Recent Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Marco Cicciù; Luca Fiorillo; Gabriele Cervino
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 5.118

4.  Preventive effect of chitosan gel containing CaneCPI-5 against enamel erosive wear in situ.

Authors:  Vinícius Taioqui Pelá; Leonardo Brito; Even Akemi Taira; Flávio Henrique-Silva; Joana Claudio Pieretti; Amedea Barozzi Seabra; Cristiane de Almeida Baldini Cardoso; Eduardo Pereira de Souza; Sonia Groisman; Marcela Charantola Rodrigues; Adrian Lussi; Thiago Saads Carvalho; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Relationship between toothpastes properties and patient-reported discomfort: crossover study.

Authors:  Mariana Bruno; Fernando Taddeo; Igor Studart Medeiros; Letícia Cristina Cidreira Boaro; Maria Stella N A Moreira; Márcia Martins Marques; Fernanda Calabró Calheiros
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Chitosan Biomaterials for Current and Potential Dental Applications.

Authors:  Shehriar Husain; Khalid H Al-Samadani; Shariq Najeeb; Muhammad S Zafar; Zohaib Khurshid; Sana Zohaib; Saad B Qasim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study.

Authors:  Elahe Babashahi; Maryam Mohmadi Kartalaie; Leila Basir; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2019-01-20

8.  Antibacterial Effects of Chitosan, Formocresol and CMCP as Pulpectomy Medicament on Enterococcusfaecalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcusmutans.

Authors:  Zhila Imani; Zahra Imani; Leila Basir; Mohsen Shayeste; Effat Abbasi Montazeri; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018

Review 9.  Nanoparticles as Anti-Microbial, Anti-Inflammatory, and Remineralizing Agents in Oral Care Cosmetics: A Review of the Current Situation.

Authors:  Florence Carrouel; Stephane Viennot; Livia Ottolenghi; Cedric Gaillard; Denis Bourgeois
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  Impact of mucin on the anti-erosive/anti-abrasive efficacy of chitosan and/or F/Sn in enamel in vitro.

Authors:  Benedikt Luka; Vivien Arbter; Kathrin Sander; Andrea Duerrschnabel; Nadine Schlueter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.