Literature DB >> 23417359

Mitotic counts in breast cancer after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and development of metastatic disease.

Janice Diaz1, Lesley Stead, Nella Shapiro, Rosanne Newell, Olivier Loudig, Yungtai Lo, Joseph Sparano, Susan Fineberg.   

Abstract

Although pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NST) is associated with an excellent prognosis, the prognosis for patients with residual disease is variable. The mitotic count (MC) is commonly used in the evaluation of histologic tumor grade, but its prognostic value relative to other factors when determined after NST has not been studied. We evaluated MC in the residual tumor after NST in order to determine whether it provided prognostic information independent of other factors, including the residual cancer burden (RCB). We retrospectively reviewed pathologic specimens from 80 patients with localized breast cancer who received standard NST, of whom 61 had residual disease evaluable for MC analysis and RCB score. The exact number of mitotic figures was counted in 10 high power (40×) fields (hpf). We classified tumors as having high (≥13 per 10 hpf) and low (<13 per 10 hpf) MC because this threshold fell at the midpoint for an intermediate MC score in the Nottingham combined histologic grade. Distant metastases developed in 2 of 32 (6.3 %) patients with a low MC compared with 18 of 29 (62.1 %) with a high MC (log-rank test, p < 0.001). When adjusted for other covariates, including age, estrogen receptor, HER2/neu expressions, and RCB score, a high MC was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing distant metastases (hazard ratio 11.21, 95 % CI [2.19, 57.37]; p = 0.004). Our findings indicated that evaluation of MC after NST warrants validation and further evaluation as a prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23417359     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2411-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Frederique Penault-Llorca; Nina Radosevic-Robin
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Standardization of pathologic evaluation and reporting of postneoadjuvant specimens in clinical trials of breast cancer: recommendations from an international working group.

Authors:  Elena Provenzano; Veerle Bossuyt; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Sunil Badve; Carsten Denkert; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Judy Boughey; Giuseppe Curigliano; J Michael Dixon; Laura Esserman; Gerd Fastner; Thorsten Kuehn; Florentia Peintinger; Gunter von Minckwitz; Julia White; Wei Yang; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Patterns of Regression in Breast Cancer after Primary Systemic Treatment.

Authors:  Tamás Zombori; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Pathologic Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Cheol Keun Park; Woo-Hee Jung; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2016-04-11

5.  Neoadjuvant Metformin Added to Systemic Therapy Decreases the Proliferative Capacity of Residual Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eugeni Lopez-Bonet; Maria Buxó; Elisabet Cuyàs; Sonia Pernas; Joan Dorca; Isabel Álvarez; Susana Martínez; Jose Manuel Pérez-Garcia; Norberto Batista-López; César A Rodríguez-Sánchez; Kepa Amillano; Severina Domínguez; Maria Luque; Idoia Morilla; Agostina Stradella; Gemma Viñas; Javier Cortés; Gloria Oliveras; Cristina Meléndez; Laura Castillo; Sara Verdura; Joan Brunet; Jorge Joven; Margarita Garcia; Samiha Saidani; Begoña Martin-Castillo; Javier A Menendez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.