OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of ultrasound non-invasive vascular elastography (NIVE) strain analysis to characterise carotid plaque composition and vulnerability as determined by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Thirty-one subjects with 50 % or greater carotid stenosis underwent NIVE and high-resolution MRI of internal carotid arteries. Time-varying strain images (elastograms) of segmented plaques were generated from ultrasonic raw radiofrequency sequences. On MRI, corresponding plaques and components were segmented and quantified. Associations between strain parameters, plaque composition and symptomatology were estimated with curve-fitting regressions and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Mean stenosis and age were 72.7 % and 69.3 years, respectively. Of 31 plaques, 9 were symptomatic, 17 contained lipid and 7 were vulnerable on MRI. Strains were significantly lower in plaques containing a lipid core compared with those without lipid, with 77-100 % sensitivity and 57-79 % specificity (P < 0.032). A statistically significant quadratic fit was found between strain and lipid content (P < 0.03). Strains did not discriminate symptomatic patients or vulnerable plaques. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound NIVE is feasible in patients with significant carotid stenosis and can detect the presence of a lipid core with high sensitivity and moderate specificity. Studies of plaque progression with NIVE are required to identify vulnerable plaques. KEY POINTS: • Non-invasive vascular elastography (NIVE) provides additional information in vascular ultrasound • Ultrasound NIVE is feasible in patients with significant carotid stenosis • Ultrasound NIVE detects a lipid core with high sensitivity and moderate specificity • Studies on plaque progression with NIVE are required to identify vulnerable plaques.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of ultrasound non-invasive vascular elastography (NIVE) strain analysis to characterise carotid plaque composition and vulnerability as determined by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Thirty-one subjects with 50 % or greater carotid stenosis underwent NIVE and high-resolution MRI of internal carotid arteries. Time-varying strain images (elastograms) of segmented plaques were generated from ultrasonic raw radiofrequency sequences. On MRI, corresponding plaques and components were segmented and quantified. Associations between strain parameters, plaque composition and symptomatology were estimated with curve-fitting regressions and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Mean stenosis and age were 72.7 % and 69.3 years, respectively. Of 31 plaques, 9 were symptomatic, 17 contained lipid and 7 were vulnerable on MRI. Strains were significantly lower in plaques containing a lipid core compared with those without lipid, with 77-100 % sensitivity and 57-79 % specificity (P < 0.032). A statistically significant quadratic fit was found between strain and lipid content (P < 0.03). Strains did not discriminate symptomatic patients or vulnerable plaques. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound NIVE is feasible in patients with significant carotid stenosis and can detect the presence of a lipid core with high sensitivity and moderate specificity. Studies of plaque progression with NIVE are required to identify vulnerable plaques. KEY POINTS: • Non-invasive vascular elastography (NIVE) provides additional information in vascular ultrasound • Ultrasound NIVE is feasible in patients with significant carotid stenosis • Ultrasound NIVE detects a lipid core with high sensitivity and moderate specificity • Studies on plaque progression with NIVE are required to identify vulnerable plaques.
Authors: Roch L Maurice; Jacques Ohayon; Yves Frétigny; Michel Bertrand; Gilles Soulez; Guy Cloutier Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Andreas Harloff; Timo Zech; Alex Frydrychowicz; Martin Schumacher; Joachim Schöllhorn; Jürgen Hennig; Cornelius Weiller; Michael Markl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: William S Kerwin; Kevin D O'Brien; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Chris L de Korte; Marion J Sierevogel; Frits Mastik; Chaylendra Strijder; Johannes A Schaar; Evelyn Velema; Gerard Pasterkamp; P W Serruys; Anton F W van der Steen Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-04-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tobias Saam; Jianming Cai; Lin Ma; You-Quan Cai; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak L Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hairong Shi; Carol C Mitchell; Matthew McCormick; Mark A Kliewer; Robert J Dempsey; Tomy Varghese Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N Di Leo; L Venturini; V de Soccio; V Forte; P Lucchetti; G Cerone; G Alagna; M Caratozzolo; D Messineo; C Di Gioia; L Di Marzo; D Fresilli; C De Vito; G Pugliese; V Cantisani; F D'Ambrosio Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2018-10-31
Authors: Luca Saba; Pankaj K Jain; Harman S Suri; Nobutaka Ikeda; Tadashi Araki; Bikesh K Singh; Andrew Nicolaides; Shoaib Shafique; Ajay Gupta; John R Laird; Jasjit S Suri Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2017-05-13 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Ronny X Li; Iason Z Apostolakis; Paul Kemper; Matthew D J McGarry; Ada Ip; Edward S Connolly; James F McKinsey; Elisa E Konofagou Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Tomasz J Czernuszewicz; Jonathon W Homeister; Melissa C Caughey; Mark A Farber; Joseph J Fulton; Peter F Ford; William A Marston; Raghuveer Vallabhaneni; Timothy C Nichols; Caterina M Gallippi Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Iason Z Apostolakis; Grigorios M Karageorgos; Pierre Nauleau; Sacha D Nandlall; Elisa E Konofagou Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Daniele Fresilli; Nicola Di Leo; Ombretta Martinelli; Luca Di Marzo; Patrizia Pacini; Vincenzo Dolcetti; Giovanni Del Gaudio; Fabrizio Canni; Ludovica Isabella Ricci; Corrado De Vito; Corrado Caiazzo; Raffaella Carletti; Cira Di Gioia; Iacopo Carbone; Steven B Feinstein; Carlo Catalano; Vito Cantisani Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2022-09-17 Impact factor: 6.313
Authors: Xiao Wang; Daren C Jackson; Carol C Mitchell; Tomy Varghese; Stephanie M Wilbrand; Brandon G Rocque; Bruce P Hermann; Robert J Dempsey Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 2.998