PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility and acceptability of office hysteroscopic polypectomy using a new continuous-flow operative 16 Fr Gubbini's mini-resectoscope. This is a prospective clinical study (Canadian Task Force classification III). METHODS: The office hysteroscopic polypectomy was performed with a mini-resectoscope without analgesia or anesthesia. We evaluated the polyp size and the number, the effectiveness of resection, the operating time, the pelvic pain and complications. RESULTS: The office hysteroscopic polypectomy was successfully performed in all 33 patients. The polyps ranged in size from 5 to 50 mm with a mean of 18.15 ± 11.45 mm. We analyzed the operating time with a mean of 11.45 ± 4.71 min: 29 procedures took less than 15 min from the start of vaginoscopy to the end of surgery. Overall mean visual analog scale (VAS) calculated was 2.48 ± 1.37 (range 0-6). The correlation between the size of the polyps and operating time was statistically significant (p < 0.001). No major complications were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data demonstrated that can be possible to remove endometrial polyps by hysteroscopy, using the mini-resectoscope, in an office setting. All procedures were completed successfully and well tolerated with a little discomfort permitting the removal also of big sized polyps without a statistical correlation between VAS and size of polyps or operating time. The outpatient polypectomy is a less-costing procedure and represents an acceptable and effective alternative to inpatient resectoscopic polypectomy, leading to a complete polyp excision in nearly all patients.
PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility and acceptability of office hysteroscopic polypectomy using a new continuous-flow operative 16 Fr Gubbini's mini-resectoscope. This is a prospective clinical study (Canadian Task Force classification III). METHODS: The office hysteroscopic polypectomy was performed with a mini-resectoscope without analgesia or anesthesia. We evaluated the polyp size and the number, the effectiveness of resection, the operating time, the pelvic pain and complications. RESULTS: The office hysteroscopic polypectomy was successfully performed in all 33 patients. The polyps ranged in size from 5 to 50 mm with a mean of 18.15 ± 11.45 mm. We analyzed the operating time with a mean of 11.45 ± 4.71 min: 29 procedures took less than 15 min from the start of vaginoscopy to the end of surgery. Overall mean visual analog scale (VAS) calculated was 2.48 ± 1.37 (range 0-6). The correlation between the size of the polyps and operating time was statistically significant (p < 0.001). No major complications were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data demonstrated that can be possible to remove endometrial polyps by hysteroscopy, using the mini-resectoscope, in an office setting. All procedures were completed successfully and well tolerated with a little discomfort permitting the removal also of big sized polyps without a statistical correlation between VAS and size of polyps or operating time. The outpatient polypectomy is a less-costing procedure and represents an acceptable and effective alternative to inpatient resectoscopic polypectomy, leading to a complete polyp excision in nearly all patients.