Antje Petersen1, Ulrich Poetter, Claire Michelsen, Mechthild M Gross. 1. Midwifery Research and Education Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Petersen.Antje@mh-hannover.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: To model the timing and sequence of intrapartum interventions and to estimate the association with labor length and delivery mode. METHODS: A longitudinal multi-center cohort study included data from 3,955 low-risk women who gave birth in hospitals in Lower Saxony, Germany. We analyzed three intrapartum interventions: amniotomy, oxytocin augmentation and epidural analgesia. We divided births into time intervals delineated by these interventions and noted cervical dilation at interval onset. We analyzed the duration of intervals from onset of labor until the first intervention and between intrapartum interventions with Kaplan-Meier's estimate, regarding the three interventions as competing risks. Further, we analyzed the cervical dilation before an intervention by Kaplan-Meier's estimate without censoring. RESULTS: 73.2 % of the included 2,082 nulliparae (n = 1,525) and 59.6 % of the included 1,873 multiparae (n = 1,117) received at least one intervention, while 1,313 women (33.2 %) experienced a normal labor without any of these interventions. The intervals from onset of labor until the first intervention and from the first until the second intervention were significantly shorter in multiparae than in nulliparae. The intervention cascade in nulliparae most often started with epidural analgesia in early labor (n = 579, 27.8 %). Oxytocin augmentation most often followed after a short interval (n = 343, 59.2 %, median 1.57 h). In multiparae, amniotomy was most often the first intervention (n = 629, 33.6 %), and spontaneous birth most often followed (n = 503, 80.0 %). Labor duration and operative deliveries increased as interventions increased. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal sequence of intrapartum interventions varied in association with parity, cervical dilation, labor duration and mode of birth.
PURPOSE: To model the timing and sequence of intrapartum interventions and to estimate the association with labor length and delivery mode. METHODS: A longitudinal multi-center cohort study included data from 3,955 low-risk women who gave birth in hospitals in Lower Saxony, Germany. We analyzed three intrapartum interventions: amniotomy, oxytocin augmentation and epidural analgesia. We divided births into time intervals delineated by these interventions and noted cervical dilation at interval onset. We analyzed the duration of intervals from onset of labor until the first intervention and between intrapartum interventions with Kaplan-Meier's estimate, regarding the three interventions as competing risks. Further, we analyzed the cervical dilation before an intervention by Kaplan-Meier's estimate without censoring. RESULTS: 73.2 % of the included 2,082 nulliparae (n = 1,525) and 59.6 % of the included 1,873 multiparae (n = 1,117) received at least one intervention, while 1,313 women (33.2 %) experienced a normal labor without any of these interventions. The intervals from onset of labor until the first intervention and from the first until the second intervention were significantly shorter in multiparae than in nulliparae. The intervention cascade in nulliparae most often started with epidural analgesia in early labor (n = 579, 27.8 %). Oxytocin augmentation most often followed after a short interval (n = 343, 59.2 %, median 1.57 h). In multiparae, amniotomy was most often the first intervention (n = 629, 33.6 %), and spontaneous birth most often followed (n = 503, 80.0 %). Labor duration and operative deliveries increased as interventions increased. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal sequence of intrapartum interventions varied in association with parity, cervical dilation, labor duration and mode of birth.
Authors: Pien M Offerhaus; Caroline Geerts; Ank de Jonge; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Jos W R Twisk; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Laura Garcia-Lausin; Mercedes Perez-Botella; Xavier Duran; Maria Felisa Mamblona-Vicente; Maria Jesus Gutierrez-Martin; Eugenia Gómez de Enterria-Cuesta; Ramon Escuriet Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anna E Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; Dirkje C Zondag; Marianne Nieuwenhuijze; Thomas van den Akker; Corine J Verhoeven; Caroline C Geerts; François G Schellevis; Ank de Jonge Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Jun Zhang; Jagteshwar Grewal; Linda C Chan; Antje Petersen; Mechthild M Gross Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2016-06-27
Authors: Anna Martín-Arribas; Rafael Vila-Candel; Rhona O'Connell; Martina Dillon; Inmaculada Vila-Bellido; M Ángeles Beneyto; Inmaculada De Molina-Fernández; Nerea Rodríguez-Conesa; Cristina González-Blázquez; Ramón Escuriet Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390