BACKGROUND: Low and low-normal serum potassium is associated with an increased risk of diabetes. We hypothesized that the protective effect of valsartan on diabetes risk could be mediated by its effect of raising serum potassium. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Nateglinide and Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial, which randomized participants at risk for diabetes to eithervalsartan (up to 160mg daily) or no valsartan. Using Cox models, we evaluated the effect of valsartan on diabetes risk over a median of 4 years of follow-up and calculated the mediation effect of serum potassium as the difference in treatment hazard ratios from models excluding and including 1-year change in serum potassium. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in log hazard ratios was computed by bootstrapping. RESULTS: The hazard ratio for developing diabetes among those on valsartan vs. no valsartan was 0.866 (95% CI = 0.795-0.943) vs. 0.868 (95% CI = 0.797-0.945), after controlling for 1-year change in potassium. The bootstrap 95% CI for a difference in these log hazard ratios was not statistically significant (-0.003 to 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Serum potassium does not appear to significantly mediate the protective effect of valsartan on diabetes risk.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Low and low-normal serum potassium is associated with an increased risk of diabetes. We hypothesized that the protective effect of valsartan on diabetes risk could be mediated by its effect of raising serum potassium. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Nateglinide and Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial, which randomized participants at risk for diabetes to either valsartan (up to 160mg daily) or no valsartan. Using Cox models, we evaluated the effect of valsartan on diabetes risk over a median of 4 years of follow-up and calculated the mediation effect of serum potassium as the difference in treatment hazard ratios from models excluding and including 1-year change in serum potassium. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in log hazard ratios was computed by bootstrapping. RESULTS: The hazard ratio for developing diabetes among those on valsartan vs. no valsartan was 0.866 (95% CI = 0.795-0.943) vs. 0.868 (95% CI = 0.797-0.945), after controlling for 1-year change in potassium. The bootstrap 95% CI for a difference in these log hazard ratios was not statistically significant (-0.003 to 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Serum potassium does not appear to significantly mediate the protective effect of valsartan on diabetes risk.
Authors: Y Heianza; S Hara; Y Arase; K Saito; K Totsuka; H Tsuji; S Kodama; S D Hsieh; N Yamada; K Kosaka; H Sone Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Ranee Chatterjee; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Tariq Shafi; Elizabeth Selvin; Cheryl Anderson; James S Pankow; Edgar Miller; Frederick Brancati Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-10-25
Authors: John J McMurray; Rury R Holman; Steven M Haffner; M Angelyn Bethel; Björn Holzhauer; Tsushung A Hua; Yuri Belenkov; Mitradev Boolell; John B Buse; Brendan M Buckley; Antonio R Chacra; Fu-Tien Chiang; Bernard Charbonnel; Chun-Chung Chow; Melanie J Davies; Prakash Deedwania; Peter Diem; Daniel Einhorn; Vivian Fonseca; Gregory R Fulcher; Zbigniew Gaciong; Sonia Gaztambide; Thomas Giles; Edward Horton; Hasan Ilkova; Trond Jenssen; Steven E Kahn; Henry Krum; Markku Laakso; Lawrence A Leiter; Naomi S Levitt; Viacheslav Mareev; Felipe Martinez; Chantal Masson; Theodore Mazzone; Eduardo Meaney; Richard Nesto; Changyu Pan; Rudolf Prager; Sotirios A Raptis; Guy E H M Rutten; Herbert Sandstroem; Frank Schaper; Andre Scheen; Ole Schmitz; Isaac Sinay; Vladimir Soska; Steen Stender; Gyula Tamás; Gianni Tognoni; Jaako Tuomilehto; Alberto S Villamil; Juraj Vozár; Robert M Califf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245