BACKGROUND: Capturing the complex time pattern of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) using accelerometry remains a challenge. Research from occupational health suggests exposure variation analysis (EVA) could provide a meaningful tool. This paper (1) explains the application of EVA to accelerometer data, (2) demonstrates how EVA thresholds and derivatives could be chosen and used to examine adherence to PA and SB guidelines, and (3) explores the validity of EVA outputs. METHODS: EVA outputs are compared with accelerometer data from 4 individuals (Study 1a and 1b) and 3 occupational groups (Study 2): seated workstation office workers (n = 8), standing workstation office workers (n = 8), and teachers (n = 8). RESULTS: Line graphs and related EVA graphs highlight the use of EVA derivatives for examining compliance with guidelines. EVA derivatives of occupational groups confirm no difference in bouts of activity but clear differences as expected in extended bouts of SB and brief bursts of activity, thus providing evidence of construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: EVA offers a unique and comprehensive generic method that is able, for the first time, to capture the time pattern (both frequency and intensity) of PA and SB, which can be tailored for both occupational and public health research.
BACKGROUND: Capturing the complex time pattern of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) using accelerometry remains a challenge. Research from occupational health suggests exposure variation analysis (EVA) could provide a meaningful tool. This paper (1) explains the application of EVA to accelerometer data, (2) demonstrates how EVA thresholds and derivatives could be chosen and used to examine adherence to PA and SB guidelines, and (3) explores the validity of EVA outputs. METHODS: EVA outputs are compared with accelerometer data from 4 individuals (Study 1a and 1b) and 3 occupational groups (Study 2): seated workstation office workers (n = 8), standing workstation office workers (n = 8), and teachers (n = 8). RESULTS: Line graphs and related EVA graphs highlight the use of EVA derivatives for examining compliance with guidelines. EVA derivatives of occupational groups confirm no difference in bouts of activity but clear differences as expected in extended bouts of SB and brief bursts of activity, thus providing evidence of construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: EVA offers a unique and comprehensive generic method that is able, for the first time, to capture the time pattern (both frequency and intensity) of PA and SB, which can be tailored for both occupational and public health research.
Authors: Juliana Zabatiero; Anne Smith; Daniel F Gucciardi; Jeffrey M Hamdorf Am; Susan F Taylor; Kylie Hill Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Vinicius Cavalheri; Sue Jenkins; Nola Cecins; Martin Phillips; Lucas H Sanders; Kylie Hill Journal: Chron Respir Dis Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 2.444
Authors: Emmanuel Frimpong; Joanne A McVeigh; Dick van der Jagt; Lipalo Mokete; Yusuf S Kaoje; Mohammed Tikly; Rebecca M Meiring Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: David M Hallman; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Nidhi Gupta; Mette Korshøj; Andreas Holtermann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 3.295