Literature DB >> 2341677

Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth.

D R Perrott1, K Saberi.   

Abstract

Minimum audible angle (MAA) thresholds were obtained for four subjects in a two-alternative, forced-choice, three up/one down, adaptive paradigm as a function of the orientation of the array of sources. With sources distributed on the horizontal plane, the mean MAA threshold was 0.97 degrees. With the sources distributed on the vertical plane (array rotated 90 degrees), the mean MAA threshold was 3.65 degrees. Performance in both conditions was well in line with previous experiments of this type. Tests were also conducted with sources distributed on oblique planes. As the array was rotated from 10 degrees-60 degrees from the horizontal plane, relatively little change in the MAA threshold was observed; the mean MAA thresholds ranged from 0.78 degrees to 1.06 degrees. Only when the array was nearly vertical (80 degrees) was there any appreciable loss in spatial resolution; the MAA threshold had increased to 1.8 degrees. The relevance of these results to research on auditory localization under natural listening conditions, especially in the presence of head movements, is also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341677     DOI: 10.1121/1.399421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Spatial processing in the auditory cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G H Recanzone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Auditory psychomotor coordination and visual search performance.

Authors:  D R Perrott; K Saberi; K Brown; T Z Strybel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-09

3.  Can measures of sound localization acuity be related to the precision of absolute location estimates?

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right-left prevalence effect.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Katsumi Minakata; Mary Kim Ngo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-06

5.  Improvement in spatial imagery following sight onset late in childhood.

Authors:  Tapan K Gandhi; Suma Ganesh; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-01-09

6.  Directing eye gaze enhances auditory spatial cue discrimination.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Dean A Pospisil; G Christopher Stecker; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Discrimination and streaming of speech sounds based on differences in interaural and spectral cues.

Authors:  Marion David; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition.

Authors:  Atsushi Aoyama
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Letter to the Editor: Johnson, J. A., Xu, J., Cox, R. M. (2017). Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization, Ear Hear, 38, 746-759.

Authors:  Anna C Diedesch; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The impact of spatial incongruence on an auditory-visual illusion.

Authors:  Hamish Innes-Brown; David Crewther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.