Literature DB >> 23415877

Focal modulation of the primary motor cortex in fibromyalgia using 4×1-ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): immediate and delayed analgesic effects of cathodal and anodal stimulation.

Mauricio F Villamar1, Pakorn Wivatvongvana, Jayanton Patumanond, Marom Bikson, Dennis Q Truong, Abhishek Datta, Felipe Fregni.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Fibromyalgia is a prevalent chronic pain syndrome characterized by altered pain and sensory processing in the central nervous system, which is often refractory to multiple therapeutic approaches. Given previous evidence supporting analgesic properties of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in this condition, this study examined the effects of a novel, more focal method of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), using the 4×1-ring configuration of high-definition (HD)-tDCS, on overall perceived pain in fibromyalgia patients. In this patient- and assessor-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial, 18 patients were randomized to undergo single 20-minute sessions of anodal, cathodal, and sham HD-tDCS at 2.0 mA in a counterbalanced fashion. The center electrode was positioned over the left primary motor cortex. Pain scales and sensory testing were assessed before and after each intervention. A finite element method brain model was generated to predict electric field distribution. We found that both active stimulation conditions led to significant reduction in overall perceived pain as compared to sham. This effect occurred immediately after cathodal HD-tDCS and was evident for both anodal and cathodal HD-tDCS 30 minutes after stimulation. Furthermore, active anodal stimulation induced a significant bilateral increase in mechanical detection thresholds. These interventions proved well tolerated in our patient population. PERSPECTIVE: 4×1-ring HD-tDCS, a novel noninvasive brain stimulation technique capable of more focal and targeted stimulation, provides significant reduction in overall perceived pain in fibromyalgia patients as compared to sham stimulation, irrespective of current polarity. This technique may have other applications in research and clinical settings, which should be further explored.
Copyright © 2013 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415877     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  50 in total

1.  ["Not a miracle but impressive effects"? : On the discussion about the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation].

Authors:  R Glaser
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of default mode network parietal nodes decreases negative mind-wandering about the past.

Authors:  Tina Chou; Jill M Hooley; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2019-09-28

Review 3.  Developing an optimized strategy with transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance the endogenous pain control system in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Dante Duarte; Luis Eduardo Coutinho Castelo-Branco; Elif Uygur Kucukseymen; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Modulating conscious movement intention by noninvasive brain stimulation and the underlying neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Zachary H Douglas; Brian Maniscalco; Mark Hallett; Eric M Wassermann; Biyu J He
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of HD-tDCS on memory and metamemory for general knowledge questions that vary by difficulty.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Chua; Rifat Ahmed; Sandry M Garcia
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Extended Multiple-Field High-Definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) is well tolerated and safe in healthy adults.

Authors:  Christopher A Turski; Alanna Kessler-Jones; Clara Chow; Bruce Hermann; David Hsu; Jana Jones; Susanne K Seeger; Rick Chappell; Melanie Boly; Chrysanthy Ikonomidou
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Vaughn Bryant; Daniela Sacchetti; Felix Gervits; Roy Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for tinnitus modulation: a preliminary trial.

Authors:  Giriraj Singh Shekhawat; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Feasibility of remotely-supervised tDCS in a person with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sandra Carvalho; Jorge Leite; Camila B Pinto; Leslie R Morse; Ross Zafonte; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Differential effects of bifrontal and occipital nerve stimulation on pain and fatigue using transcranial direct current stimulation in fibromyalgia patients.

Authors:  Wing Ting To; Evan James; Jan Ost; John Hart; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.